ALAN DERSHOWITZ: The Supreme Court Moves Us One Step Closer To A Colorblind Society

I noted. He said people should turn a blind eye to the evil people do.
Link? That you didn’t provide. And you’re far from credible, so links are required.
I simply can not understand anyone wanting anything to do with this guy.
You simply can’t refute what he said about the ideal of a colorblind society. So you deflect to cheap smears, etc.
Do you understand the evil he did?
Name any evil he did.
Of course you do but he is pimping your politics now so all is good.
You’re a random douche bag.
 
well actually they do…people have paid him tons of money to make a point…he’s a lawyer and professor

One big one, Epstein. Knowing who he was he worked to allow him to continue what he was doing.
 
One big one, Epstein. Knowing who he was he worked to allow him to continue what he was doing.
Pknopp is too simplistic to grasp that lawyers generally don’t pass judgment on clients and aren’t supposed to. It is a beneficial to our system of Justice that lawyers represent all clients, not just squeaky clean ones.
 
One big one, Epstein. Knowing who he was he worked to allow him to continue what he was doing.
haha aw there it is…he’s a criminal defense attorney! haha that’s your issue with him? haha

he did what lawyers do, zealously advocates for their client. He worked out a deal with the govt and had him plea.

it was the dem DA that then worked to get him off the sex offender registrars

you are full hypocrisy and your reply to this thread has been pathetic
 
Name any evil he did.

Dershowitz said that a president can't be impeached for "abuse of power" unless that abuse involves a statutory crime.
Which means a president endorse people to commit federal crimes, and promise to pardon them when they do.

And congress would have no power (through impeachment) to stop him.
 
Pknopp is too simplistic to grasp that lawyers generally don’t pass judgment on clients and aren’t supposed to. It is a beneficial to our system of Justice that lawyers represent all clients, not just squeaky clean ones.

One knows someone is abusing young girls, you don't go anywhere near him. If he had simply defended him against the death penalty I wouldn't have such a problem.

He made it so Epstein could continue abusing young girls. He was an accessory to the crimes.

It's funny (actually sad). People will get all upset over a beer can but defend Dershowitz.
 
Indeed. Do you think this statement is a lie?
Ending race-based discrimination in the form of AA is a step closer to a colorblind society.
It's like trying to stop the COVID epidemic by stopping vaccinations.
He wants to stop the cure before he stops the cause.
 
One knows someone is abusing young girls, you don't go anywhere near him. If he had simply defended him against the death penalty I wouldn't have such a problem.

He made it so Epstein could continue abusing young girls.

It's funny (actually sad). People will get all upset over a beer can but defend Dershowitz.
You have a big ass mouth. But you’re always light on supporting your claims.

In any event, you remain wrong. Lawyers have an ethical duty to represent clients. And not minimally. Whatever is in the client’s best legal interests bounded solely by the law itself.
 
Last edited:
You have a big ass mouth. But your always light on supporting your claims.

In any event, you remain wrong. Lawyers have an ethical duty to represent clients. And not minimally. Whatever is in the client’s best legal interests bounded solely by the law itself.

They don't have an obligation to then pal around with them on kiddie island.
 
Dershowitz said that a president can't be impeached for "abuse of power" unless that abuse involves a statutory crime.
Which means a president endorse people to commit federal crimes, and promise to pardon them when they do.

And congress would have no power (through impeachment) to stop him.
that’s evil? making a legal argument you don’t like?
 

Forum List

Back
Top