Frankeneinstein
Gold Member
isn't that the objective of todays courts? to usurp the will of the people...where's JoeBob?The Supreme COurt said otherwise in Wong v. US, and they are about to say it again for the hard of hearing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
isn't that the objective of todays courts? to usurp the will of the people...where's JoeBob?The Supreme COurt said otherwise in Wong v. US, and they are about to say it again for the hard of hearing.
because it was wrote in 1866..........and you are a specialist?But the 14th doesn't say that. does it?
not in 1866 bud.......negro's were allowed and welcome then, they were bought like a used carWhat you seem to have missed is it's no different smuggling negros into the US illegally, than it is smuggling mexicans into the US illegally.
People have been illegally smuggling humans into the US for hundreds of years.
And whether 1866 or 1966, the children of those illegals born in the US, became citizens by the 14th amendment.
Eong was NOT illegal and neither were his parent, thus he is a US citizenThe Supreme COurt said otherwise in Wong v. US, and they are about to say it again for the hard of hearing.