Supreme Court & Birthright Citizenship

[BackAgain]

Nope, that is you.

Wrong. As I already established.

Why no evidentia hearing?

It doesn’t even dawn on a moron like you that if a court doesn’t even grant an evidentiary hearing, that it will never be able to decide ON that pesky “evidence” stuff.

There were allegations without proof.

No. There was not. There were allegation which courts conveniently denied prior to any effort to take evidence.

Plaintiff attorneys could not provide evidence.

They could. And did. Just not to courts who don’t give a damn about doing the job they are supposed to do.

Judges adjudicate, and what they adjudicated is that the allegations were shit. End of story.

Nope. They can’t adjudicate a dispute on a fact level if they deny any evidentiary hearings.

 

[jacksonlamb]

You are stupid, backagain.

Lawyers come into court, tell the judge what the case is and what evidence they have. The court then decides if that sounds worth of evidentiary hearing.

Trump's people could not even get out of the starting blocks.

 

[protectionist]

... which means kids of foreign diplomats. All other kids of foreigners were born citizens if born on US soil.

No, it means all kids of foreigners. Why would it apply to kids of diplomats, and not to kids of fence climbers ? Duh!

 

[jacksonlamb]

No, it means all kids of foreigners. Why would it apply to kids of diplomats, and not to kids of fence climbers ? Duh!

View attachment 1241827

... because it was specified so. No one cares if you disagree.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[jacksonlamb]

View attachment 1241998

Consider she has been telling white, blonde jokes since childhood, I suppose that's fair.