The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Especially since Obama pulled us out of a GOP induced recession and a record job loss administration....

Now trump is trying to sink the economy he was gifted.

Obama drove the economy into ground with his energy policy.

And his anti business rhetoric, tax policy, regulatory policy, trade policy, healthcare mandate, etc.

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth, best economy in the world. Just horrible, super duper. Watch now as your con man orange clown idiot screws it up...

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

 

[Faun]

Obama drove the economy into ground with his energy policy.

And his anti business rhetoric, tax policy, regulatory policy, trade policy, healthcare mandate, etc.

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth, best economy in the world. Just horrible, super duper. Watch now as your con man orange clown idiot screws it up...

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

 

[francoHFW]

Obama drove the economy into ground with his energy policy.

And his anti business rhetoric, tax policy, regulatory policy, trade policy, healthcare mandate, etc.

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth, best economy in the world. Just horrible, super duper. Watch now as your con man orange clown idiot screws it up...

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

80% at least to avert a full-blown depression and unemployment and welfare for the victims, super duper. Read something instead of showing off your ignorance and misinformation.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And his anti business rhetoric, tax policy, regulatory policy, trade policy, healthcare mandate, etc.

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth, best economy in the world. Just horrible, super duper. Watch now as your con man orange clown idiot screws it up...

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And his anti business rhetoric, tax policy, regulatory policy, trade policy, healthcare mandate, etc.

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth, best economy in the world. Just horrible, super duper. Watch now as your con man orange clown idiot screws it up...

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

80% at least to avert a full-blown depression and unemployment and welfare for the victims, super duper. Read something instead of showing off your ignorance and misinformation.

80% at least to avert a full-blown depression

You mean the recession that ended in June 2009? DURR......

 

[francoHFW]

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth, best economy in the world. Just horrible, super duper. Watch now as your con man orange clown idiot screws it up...

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

80% at least to avert a full-blown depression and unemployment and welfare for the victims, super duper. Read something instead of showing off your ignorance and misinformation.

80% at least to avert a full-blown depression

You mean the recession that ended in June 2009? DURR......

The recession that technically ended, with nine million fewer jobs, dumbass, and half of the rest of the world also totally screwed up. Great job! And half the GOP doesn't even know it happened. At least.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

80% at least to avert a full-blown depression and unemployment and welfare for the victims, super duper. Read something instead of showing off your ignorance and misinformation.

80% at least to avert a full-blown depression

You mean the recession that ended in June 2009? DURR......

The recession that technically ended, with nine million fewer jobs, dumbass, and half of the rest of the world also totally screwed up. Great job! And half the GOP doesn't even know it happened. At least.

Obama needed to add another 100,000 pages of regulations.
And Cap & Trade......that would have really given a boost to the economy.

Maybe he could have outlawed gasoline? Or at least added a $2 a gallon tax, eh?

 

[Faun]

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth, best economy in the world. Just horrible, super duper. Watch now as your con man orange clown idiot screws it up...

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

 

[gipper]

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

I thought it was the slowest recovery ever. Am I wrong?

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

I thought it was the slowest recovery ever. Am I wrong?

Yes, you're wrong. The Great Depression took longer. But I always get a kick how the right bitches and moans that the left takes too long to clean up their messes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yep seven and a half years straight of growth

Yup, very weak recovery.

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

Yup, weakest, slowest recovery since WWII.

CNN agrees.

 

[francoHFW]

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

Yup, weakest, slowest recovery since WWII.

CNN agrees.

that's what happens when the GOP screws up the entire world economy instead of just ours like usual.... We had the best economy in the world under Obama.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

16 million jobs gained during Obama's last 7 years is weak?

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

Yup, weakest, slowest recovery since WWII.

CNN agrees.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

Yup, weakest, slowest recovery since WWII.

CNN agrees.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

What are the 3 biggest differences you see between "slowest recovery" and "weakest recovery"?

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

If truth was on my side, CNN wouldn't agree with me, eh?
​

Since World War II, 10 U.S. recessions have been followed by a recovery that lasted at least three years. An Associated Press analysis shows that by just about any measure, the one that began in June 2009 is the weakest.​

Economic recovery is weakest since World War II

Or the AP.....

Economic growth is now tracking at a 1% rate in 2016—the weakest start to a year since 2011—when combined with a downwardly revised reading for the first quarter. That makes for an annual average rate of 2.1% growth since the end of the recession, the weakest pace of any expansion since at least 1949.

U.S. GDP Grew a Disappointing 1.2% in Second Quarter

Or the WSJ.

 

[gipper]

Yes, Obama had a weak recovery.
But at least he added $9.3 trillion to the debt.

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

I thought it was the slowest recovery ever. Am I wrong?

Yes, you're wrong. The Great Depression took longer. But I always get a kick how the right bitches and moans that the left takes too long to clean up their messes.

Well of course.

Just as FDR prolonged the Great Depression with dumb policies, BO did the same with Great Recession.

The difference is at least FDR offered jobs to the working class. BO offered bailouts to the richest Americans.

 

[Faun]

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

Yup, weakest, slowest recovery since WWII.

CNN agrees.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

What are the 3 biggest differences you see between "slowest recovery" and "weakest recovery"?

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

If truth was on my side, CNN wouldn't agree with me, eh?

Since World War II, 10 U.S. recessions have been followed by a recovery that lasted at least three years. An Associated Press analysis shows that by just about any measure, the one that began in June 2009 is the weakest.​

Economic recovery is weakest since World War II

Or the AP.....

Economic growth is now tracking at a 1% rate in 2016—the weakest start to a year since 2011—when combined with a downwardly revised reading for the first quarter. That makes for an annual average rate of 2.1% growth since the end of the recession, the weakest pace of any expansion since at least 1949.

U.S. GDP Grew a Disappointing 1.2% in Second Quarter

Or the WSJ.

LOL

Here we see a rightwingnut posted a link to backup his claim -- but that failed him as his link didn't say what he was saying. So now what does the rightwingnut do? He post other links he found that do agree with what he's saying.

Rightwingnut.... your first link disagrees with your second link and your third link is unrelated to your argument. I'll leave it to you to do battle with your conflicting links.

 

[Faun]

You're truly fucked in the head if you think 16 million jobs over 83 consecutive months of job growth was a weak recovery.

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

I thought it was the slowest recovery ever. Am I wrong?

Yes, you're wrong. The Great Depression took longer. But I always get a kick how the right bitches and moans that the left takes too long to clean up their messes.

Well of course.

Just as FDR prolonged the Great Depression with dumb policies, BO did the same with Great Recession.

The difference is at least FDR offered jobs to the working class. BO offered bailouts to the richest Americans.

So you say, but being elected an unprecedented 4 times to office says otherwise. Needless to say, as I said, I always get a chuckle when righties bitch & moan how the left takes too long to clean up their messes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The U.S. economy has only grown 2% a year since it bottomed out in June 2009. That's far below the typical growth in rosy times of over 4% a year that the U.S. has experienced since World War II. It's even below the rather sluggish rebound during President George W. Bush's tenure of 2.7%.

Yes, this is the slowest U.S. recovery since WWII

CNN....fake news?

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

Yup, weakest, slowest recovery since WWII.

CNN agrees.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

What are the 3 biggest differences you see between "slowest recovery" and "weakest recovery"?

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

If truth was on my side, CNN wouldn't agree with me, eh?

Since World War II, 10 U.S. recessions have been followed by a recovery that lasted at least three years. An Associated Press analysis shows that by just about any measure, the one that began in June 2009 is the weakest.​

Economic recovery is weakest since World War II

Or the AP.....

Economic growth is now tracking at a 1% rate in 2016—the weakest start to a year since 2011—when combined with a downwardly revised reading for the first quarter. That makes for an annual average rate of 2.1% growth since the end of the recession, the weakest pace of any expansion since at least 1949.

U.S. GDP Grew a Disappointing 1.2% in Second Quarter

Or the WSJ.

LOL

Here we see a rightwingnut posted a link to backup his claim -- but that failed him as his link didn't say what he was saying. So now what does the rightwingnut do? He post other links he found that do agree with what he's saying.

Rightwingnut.... your first link disagrees with your second link and your third link is unrelated to your argument. I'll leave it to you to do battle with your conflicting links.

Weakest recovery, slowest recovery. Synonyms.
Both describe Obama's economy.

 

[Faun]

It was also the deepest recession since WWII.

Regardless, I note you just pulled a bait and switch with your argument. You went from it being a "weak" recovery to a "slow" recovery.

Yup, weakest, slowest recovery since WWII.

CNN agrees.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

What are the 3 biggest differences you see between "slowest recovery" and "weakest recovery"?

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

If truth was on my side, CNN wouldn't agree with me, eh?

Since World War II, 10 U.S. recessions have been followed by a recovery that lasted at least three years. An Associated Press analysis shows that by just about any measure, the one that began in June 2009 is the weakest.​

Economic recovery is weakest since World War II

Or the AP.....

Economic growth is now tracking at a 1% rate in 2016—the weakest start to a year since 2011—when combined with a downwardly revised reading for the first quarter. That makes for an annual average rate of 2.1% growth since the end of the recession, the weakest pace of any expansion since at least 1949.

U.S. GDP Grew a Disappointing 1.2% in Second Quarter

Or the WSJ.

LOL

Here we see a rightwingnut posted a link to backup his claim -- but that failed him as his link didn't say what he was saying. So now what does the rightwingnut do? He post other links he found that do agree with what he's saying.

Rightwingnut.... your first link disagrees with your second link and your third link is unrelated to your argument. I'll leave it to you to do battle with your conflicting links.

Weakest recovery, slowest recovery. Synonyms.
Both describe Obama's economy.

Nope, your CNN article says the economist wouldn't declare it was the weakest recovery. You're losing your battle to untangle your conflicting links.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yup, weakest, slowest recovery since WWII.

CNN agrees.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

Nope, they said slowest, not weakest.

What are the 3 biggest differences you see between "slowest recovery" and "weakest recovery"?

If truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like you do.

If truth was on my side, CNN wouldn't agree with me, eh?

Since World War II, 10 U.S. recessions have been followed by a recovery that lasted at least three years. An Associated Press analysis shows that by just about any measure, the one that began in June 2009 is the weakest.​

Economic recovery is weakest since World War II

Or the AP.....

Economic growth is now tracking at a 1% rate in 2016—the weakest start to a year since 2011—when combined with a downwardly revised reading for the first quarter. That makes for an annual average rate of 2.1% growth since the end of the recession, the weakest pace of any expansion since at least 1949.

U.S. GDP Grew a Disappointing 1.2% in Second Quarter

Or the WSJ.

LOL

Here we see a rightwingnut posted a link to backup his claim -- but that failed him as his link didn't say what he was saying. So now what does the rightwingnut do? He post other links he found that do agree with what he's saying.

Rightwingnut.... your first link disagrees with your second link and your third link is unrelated to your argument. I'll leave it to you to do battle with your conflicting links.

Weakest recovery, slowest recovery. Synonyms.
Both describe Obama's economy.

Nope, your CNN article says the economist wouldn't declare it was the weakest recovery. You're losing your battle to untangle your conflicting links.

Obama had the weakest recovery....no he didn't, it was the slowest!

DURR