The original intent of the second amendment

Stann

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2021
17,466
8,127
1,138
The leadership of a new America, which arose out of rebellion itself, or fearful of being called traitors and executed. That is one reason they did not establish a federal army, besides the fact they didn't have the money to fund it. If you read the second amendment in its entirety. The right for citizens to bear arms was given to the states so they could form their own well-regulated militias. It was their opinion but the states were so divided that they would never combined forces and attack the federal government. If not for that fact, the second amendment would not exist at all.
 
The leadership of a new America, which arose out of rebellion itself, or fearful of being called traitors and executed. That is one reason they did not establish a federal army, besides the fact they didn't have the money to fund it. If you read the second amendment in its entirety. The right for citizens to bear arms was given to the states so they could form their own well-regulated militias. It was their opinion but the states were so divided that they would never combined forces and attack the federal government. If not for that fact, the second amendment would not exist at all.
This is how the national guard started.
 
The right for citizens to bear arms was given to the states so they could form their own well-regulated militias
To keep and bear arms is the right of the people. The people. Individual human beings with trigger fingers. Got that?

No not States. And not subject to States rights either. That's a pre-civil war Democrat concept.

Guns are never outdated.
 
The leadership of a new America, which arose out of rebellion itself, or fearful of being called traitors and executed. That is one reason they did not establish a federal army, besides the fact they didn't have the money to fund it. If you read the second amendment in its entirety. The right for citizens to bear arms was given to the states so they could form their own well-regulated militias. It was their opinion but the states were so divided that they would never combined forces and attack the federal government. If not for that fact, the second amendment would not exist at all.

Read it again. You really fucked up the first time.
 
To keep and bear arms is the right of the people. The people. Individual human beings with trigger fingers. Got that?

No not States. And not subject to States rights either. That's a pre-civil war Democrat concept.

Guns are never outdated.
Where in the 2nd A. are guns noted?
 
The leadership of a new America, which arose out of rebellion itself, or fearful of being called traitors and executed. That is one reason they did not establish a federal army, besides the fact they didn't have the money to fund it. If you read the second amendment in its entirety. The right for citizens to bear arms was given to the states so they could form their own well-regulated militias. It was their opinion but the states were so divided that they would never combined forces and attack the federal government. If not for that fact, the second amendment would not exist at all.

And which historical writings do you get this analysis from?
 
I know I know. We must ignore their actual intent, the shit they ACTUALLY said, so you federal supremacists can finally jerkoff in peace.
It's best to know why they said what they did say.
 
It's best to know why they said what they did say.
It's plain English, Jake.

2ndAmendment.jpg
 
To keep and bear arms is the right of the people. The people. Individual human beings with trigger fingers. Got that?

No not States. And not subject to States rights either. That's a pre-civil war Democrat concept.

Guns are never outdated.
I think you better review history, you must have slept through it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top