danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
You wish, right-winger.You are totally ignorant, not only of the U.S. Constitution, but of every principle of law anywhere under the authority of the U.S.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You wish, right-winger.You are totally ignorant, not only of the U.S. Constitution, but of every principle of law anywhere under the authority of the U.S.
Get off my property with that Democrat Mafia mob rule enforcement squad and your puss-in-boots fire department.You wish, right-winger.
Get off the weed before you die. You and all your buddies on the extreme left.Right-wingers have nothing but fallacy. Why should we take them seriously?
Alcohol is worse.Get off the weed before you die. You and all your buddies on the extreme left.
I don't care what you people are on. The drunken marijuana-addled crowds cannot get away with revoking the gun rights of clean and soberaw abiding citizens.Alcohol is worse.
True. Arms includes a much broader category than just guns. Thanks for pointing that out.Where in the 2nd A. are guns noted?
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.True. Arms includes a much broader category than just guns. Thanks for pointing that out.
In addition to my machine guns, give me my tank and howitzers.
And having said that, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Only well regulated militia of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; and why the Union had to win our Civil War.And having said that, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
The people. Human beings. Citizens. Your neighbors. Townspeople. Whether you like them or not. Whether they have military instruction or not. Whether they are wearing blue uniforms or not. Got that?
Sigh.The leadership of a new America, which arose out of rebellion itself, or fearful of being called traitors and executed. That is one reason they did not establish a federal army, besides the fact they didn't have the money to fund it. If you read the second amendment in its entirety. The right for citizens to bear arms was given to the states so they could form their own well-regulated militias. It was their opinion but the states were so divided that they would never combined forces and attack the federal government. If not for that fact, the second amendment would not exist at all.
"Arms" cannot, in any rational or honest way, be read to exclude firearms.Where in the 2nd A. are guns noted?
Of course not, that is not my point. Arms include firearms, as well as every weapon of war noted in my post which you didn't fully post. Thus, shall not be infringed, can be controlled or denied ownership, for example fragmentation grenades."Arms" cannot, in any rational or honest way, be read to exclude firearms.
Generically, yes.Of course not, that is not my point. Arms include firearms, as well as every weapon of war...
They are.Do you not agree that [fragmentation grenades] and other lethal weapons are controlled?
The Constitution Is a Sacred Cow That Established Elitist TyrannyThe leadership of a new America, which arose out of rebellion itself, or fearful of being called traitors and executed. That is one reason they did not establish a federal army, besides the fact they didn't have the money to fund it. If you read the second amendment in its entirety. The right for citizens to bear arms was given to the states so they could form their own well-regulated militias. It was their opinion but the states were so divided that they would never combined forces and attack the federal government. If not for that fact, the second amendment would not exist at all.
No he is not…This newbie is a fucking hoot!
So, given above puts firearms into the Arms. And the Arms can be controlled (infringed upon, if you will). It's logic:Generically, yes.
As the term is used in the 2nd amendment, no.
They are.
Given the above - so what?
Incorrect. False equivalence.So, given above puts firearms into the Arms. And the Arms can be controlled (infringed upon, if you will). It's logic:
Posting part of a quote is dishonest! And a rule violation.Incorrect. False equivalence.
The part of my post you failed to quote demonstrates the flaw in your argument.
"Arms", as the term is used in the dictionary does not have the same meaning as 'arms" as the term is used in the 2nd Amendment.
Thus, it does NOT follows that because grenades - "arms", as the term is used in the dictionary - can be "controlled", then so too can firearms - "arms" as the term is used in the 2nd Amendment.