The Liberal Way: Opposing Assimilation

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2008
126,772
62,578
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. Often, there are supporting assumptions for one's beliefs that are required but, often, not consciously considered,....yet they are essential to the view in question.

Assimilation is the tradition of America; the very opposite is the case for Liberals/Democrats.

It is the Democrat way of dividing the population, encouraging a multifaceted grievance industry, and destroying the American tradition “E Pluribus Unum” which refers to a society based on neither ethnicity nor race.



a. "assimilation definition. The process by which a person or persons acquire the social and psychological characteristics of a group: “Waves of immigrants have been assimilated into the American culture.”
Assimilation | Define Assimilation at Dictionary.com
www.dictionary.com/browse/assimilation





2. I have boiled down a workable definition of 'conservative to a belief in individualism, limited constitutional government, and free markets.
In his latest book, "Scorched Earth,"
radio host, author, activist, and conservative political commentator Michael Savage uses this: borders, language and culture.

Either of these....or both of them.....are the views Americans have traditionally been assimilated to.

America was founded as a unique, singular experiment with the two definitions of conservatism as its parameters, and from much of American history, it was expected that immigrants came here respecting those views, and/or were ready to assume them.


In fact, due to the huge wave of immigration in earlier times, the nation took a breather, as it were, from immigration....and, from 1924 to 1965, immigration was almost completely discontinued.
That was the time allowed for new Americans to incorporate the views and values that would make them Americans....real Americans.
Not Liberals, or Progressives.



3. "Earlier American presidents, Republicans and Democrats alike, agreed on two basic goals: teach the newcomers English and make them Americans. The clear aim was to strengthen our national identity--to reinforce the unum in e pluribus unum--by assimilating the new arrivals into American civilization."
http://www.aei.org/article/society-and-culture/anti-americanization/



4. The great changes to this view took place under the control of the education industry by Liberals, Progressives, Democrats.

Before the Left took over the Democrat Party, even liberals understood and objected. Arthur Schlesinger, jr.:
"The attack on the common American identity
is the culmination of the cult of ethnicity. That attack was mounted in the first instance by European Americans of non-British origin (“unmeltable ethnics”) against the British foundations of American culture; then, latterly and massively, by Americans of non-European origin against the European foundations of that culture.” http://cla.calpoly.edu/~bmori/syll/316syll/Schlesinger.html


From the earlier Liberal, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr...... The attack on the common American identity...
....his words for my title of this thread:



Liberals Oppose Assimilation


Real Americans subscribe to it.
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.
 
Last edited:
Assimilation is a Righ-wing Fascist thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.



"Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are."


1. Please show how the following is in opposition to Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty


I have boiled down a workable definition of 'conservative to a belief in individualism, limited constitutional government, and free markets.
In his latest book, "Scorched Earth,"
radio host, author, activist, and conservative political commentator Michael Savage uses this: borders, language and culture.

Either of these....or both of them.....are the views Americans have traditionally been assimilated to.



2."Righ-wing Fascist thing..."

It is always incorrect to combine the terms Fascist with Right Wing.

Fascist belongs with Nazi, Communist, Socialist, Liberal, and Progressive.


Here....let's prove it:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.....
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.


How old are you, child -- 15? Your recitation of a bunch of buzz terms indicates you are the very antithesis of a free thinking individual.

There is nothing the least bit fascistic in the expectation that we retain the cohesive essence of our melting pot society rather than allow ourselves to be reduced to a bunch of warring tribes.

Especially considering the primitive and extremely illiberal cultural values you seek to preserve, you are actually warring against the liberalization process rather than acting as a liberal. This is the entire problem with this new authoritarian left - you morons claim to be liberal, but align yourself with those who wish to destroy liberalism forever.
 
I will let the liberals who founded this nation know you disapprove of them. Did they get with the program? Did they assimilate into the British Colony or did they tell the powers that be to go fuck themselves? You want a nation of mindless drones who all cut and paste like you do instead of thinking. No thanks.
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.

Assimilation is not rightwing or fascist, of an important aspect of migrants integrating into American melting pot, but so is TOLERANCE and as with most things in life this is not a question of absolutes nutters want to make it about but balance between the two.
 
No one is forced to assimilate. That is a cultural phenomenon, something that all of us facilitate in agreement that this is such a unique country. People have always wanted to assimilate, knowing that it was in their best interests.

Unfortunately, that culture is changing, as people who aren't fond of our uniqueness have gained influence. These are the people who are far more likely to point at our sins of the past, as if we are the only country with sins in its history. They'll say that the Founding Fathers were "rich white slave rapers" as a way to discredit our Constitution, to make it ripe for significant change.

E Pluribus Unum is dead. Or at least on life support.
.
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.


How old are you, child -- 15? Your recitation of a bunch of buzz terms indicates you are the very antithesis of a free thinking individual.

There is nothing the least bit fascistic in the expectation that we retain the cohesive essence of our melting pot society rather than allow ourselves to be reduced to a bunch of warring tribes.

Especially considering the primitive and extremely illiberal cultural values you seek to preserve, you are actually warring against the liberalization process rather than acting as a liberal. This is the entire problem with this new authoritarian left - you morons claim to be liberal, but align yourself with those who wish to destroy liberalism forever.
The people attempting, and failing, to destroy liberalism are morons like the OP and Trump voters, totalitarian thugs bent on making everyone stand for the pledge and salute the flag instead of burning it in protest, which they want to make a federal crime.

I stand only with those who defend liberty. Your kind never does, that would mean things like gays getting married, street preachers shouting at passing cars, and Muslims being called to prayer. You both are drones and you want more of the same.

Want to prove that you aren't a drone? Defend Muslim women wearing the burka in public here? That's freedom, that's liberty, that's liberalism and you hate the very idea of it.
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.


How old are you, child -- 15? Your recitation of a bunch of buzz terms indicates you are the very antithesis of a free thinking individual.

There is nothing the least bit fascistic in the expectation that we retain the cohesive essence of our melting pot society rather than allow ourselves to be reduced to a bunch of warring tribes.

Especially considering the primitive and extremely illiberal cultural values you seek to preserve, you are actually warring against the liberalization process rather than acting as a liberal. This is the entire problem with this new authoritarian left - you morons claim to be liberal, but align yourself with those who wish to destroy liberalism forever.
The people attempting, and failing, to destroy liberalism are morons like the OP and Trump voters, totalitarian thugs bent on making everyone stand for the pledge and salute the flag instead of burning it in protest, which they want to make a federal crime.

I stand only with those who defend liberty. Your kind never does, that would mean things like gays getting married, street preachers shouting at passing cars, and Muslims being called to prayer. You both are drones and you want more of the same.

Want to prove that you aren't a drone? Defend Muslim women wearing the burka in public here? That's freedom, that's liberty, that's liberalism and you hate the very idea of it.


You could have saved yourself quite a few words if you had simply said "Yes, I am 15".

All you seem capable of is the slinging of jargon entirely devoid of intellect.
 
5. There are several reasons why Liberals oppose assimilation, one of which is the vast numbers of them who have succumbed to government school indoctrination, and hate this nation.

The education industry is owned and operated by Liberalism, INc.


The indoctrination by ‘educators’ was intensified via the National History Standards. The document, supposed to examine what was most important for students to learn about America did not mention Daniel Webster, Robert E. Lee, Thomas Edison, or Albert Einstein.


a. “The federally funded “National History Standards” for elementary schools were released in 1994, cemented a revisionist view of American Communism for schoolteachers, as the guide mentions McCarthy over twenty times, while Edison and the Wright Brothers got no mention. “It …repeatedly condemns McCarthyism as an unmitigated evil…[but] the Hiss-Chambers and Rosenberg cases, the two dominant controversies of the anticommunist era, are described with bland, neutral language crafted to keep from implying guilt while not being quite so foolhardy as to actually assert innocence..’National Standards’…implies that the cases are part and parcel of the McCartyite horror.”
From “In Denial,” by Haynes and Klehr, pg. 151


b. Issues of race, ethnicity and gender were emphasized nearly three times as much as political liberty and democracy.


c. In fact, the term “Left” refers to the values associated with the Western welfare state, secularism, and the vast array of attitudes and positions identified as Left from Karl Marx to contemporary socialist democrat parties and today’s Democratic Party in the United States. The Left-wing ‘trinity’ is race, gender, class. "
Dennis Prager
 
Last edited:
1. Often, there are supporting assumptions for one's beliefs that are required but, often, not consciously considered,....yet they are essential to the view in question.

Assimilation is the tradition of America; the very opposite is the case for Liberals/Democrats.

It is the Democrat way of dividing the population, encouraging a multifaceted grievance industry, and destroying the American tradition “E Pluribus Unum” which refers to a society based on neither ethnicity nor race.



a. "assimilation definition. The process by which a person or persons acquire the social and psychological characteristics of a group: “Waves of immigrants have been assimilated into the American culture.”
Assimilation | Define Assimilation at Dictionary.com
www.dictionary.com/browse/assimilation





2. I have boiled down a workable definition of 'conservative to a belief in individualism, limited constitutional government, and free markets.
In his latest book, "Scorched Earth,"
radio host, author, activist, and conservative political commentator Michael Savage uses this: borders, language and culture.

Either of these....or both of them.....are the views Americans have traditionally been assimilated to.

America was founded as a unique, singular experiment with the two definitions of conservatism as its parameters, and from much of American history, it was expected that immigrants came here respecting those views, and/or were ready to assume them.


In fact, due to the huge wave of immigration in earlier times, the nation took a breather, as it were, from immigration....and, from 1924 to 1965, immigration was almost completely discontinued.
That was the time allowed for new Americans to incorporate the views and values that would make them Americans....real Americans.
Not Liberals, or Progressives.



3. "Earlier American presidents, Republicans and Democrats alike, agreed on two basic goals: teach the newcomers English and make them Americans. The clear aim was to strengthen our national identity--to reinforce the unum in e pluribus unum--by assimilating the new arrivals into American civilization."
http://www.aei.org/article/society-and-culture/anti-americanization/



4. The great changes to this view took place under the control of the education industry by Liberals, Progressives, Democrats.

Before the Left took over the Democrat Party, even liberals understood and objected. Arthur Schlesinger, jr.:
"The attack on the common American identity
is the culmination of the cult of ethnicity. That attack was mounted in the first instance by European Americans of non-British origin (“unmeltable ethnics”) against the British foundations of American culture; then, latterly and massively, by Americans of non-European origin against the European foundations of that culture.” http://cla.calpoly.edu/~bmori/syll/316syll/Schlesinger.html


From the earlier Liberal, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr...... The attack on the common American identity...
....his words for my title of this thread:



Liberals Oppose Assimilation


Real Americans subscribe to it.

Real Americans supported forcing native Americans to abandon their cultures?

Real Americans want to wipe out the Amish?

Real Americans hate St. Patrick's Day?
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.

Assimilation is not rightwing or fascist, of an important aspect of migrants integrating into American melting pot, but so is TOLERANCE and as with most things in life this is not a question of absolutes nutters want to make it about but balance between the two.
We are not a melting pot, we are a stew. And their version of "assimilation" is accept the same right-wing bullshit we do, including our God, and hate where you can from because this is the only good country to ever exist. If you accept the very premise of America, a premise based solely upon liberalism, then welcome. Funny thing is, the drones here don't accept that, they hate individualism as then there are men kissing other men in public, people running around saying Jesus is bullshit, and kids who discover that religion is for idiots and America isn't the greatest nation on earth. That doesn't fit in their Nazi version of America the Beautiful at all.

If they respected individualism they'd respect liberalism, the core philosophy that created the very idea of individualism, and they hate it instead. They are fascists, they just don't know it. All you have to do is ask them if it's perfectly fine not to stand for the national anthem, which is fascist in and of itself. They will never answer in the positive for the individual. They want happy flag-waving drones not people how might say boy does America suck on it _____.
 
I will let the liberals who founded this nation know you disapprove of them. Did they get with the program? Did they assimilate into the British Colony or did they tell the powers that be to go fuck themselves? You want a nation of mindless drones who all cut and paste like you do instead of thinking. No thanks.


"I will let the liberals who founded this nation know you disapprove of them."

1. The colloquial usage of 'Liberal,' as meant today, refers to the Socialist Party....not to the classical liberals who founded this nation....they would be known as conservatives.

Easy enough to prove:
Conservatives endorse individualism, limited constitutional government, and free markets.


Which of these groups stands for those views:
Liberals, Progressives, Democrats.

Right...none of them.




Because you are so slow-witted, you accept every lie of the Left.

2. The 'Greatest Lie" is the one that the modern Liberals tell. They claim that those called Liberals today are the liberals who founded this great nation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Founders were 'classical liberals,' whose vision included . individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. That's why they wrote out a detailed Constitution.

a. Communist John Dewey, the one who corrupted education in this country, convinced the Socialist Party to change its name to 'Liberal.' And it's values and doctrines formed those called Liberals today.




The benefit to them, of course, is that the uninformed attribute the greatness of the Founders, of America, to them.

Now....which 'Liberals' today espouse individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Certainly not the socialists/communists known as the Democrat Party
 
No one is forced to assimilate. That is a cultural phenomenon, something that all of us facilitate in agreement that this is such a unique country. People have always wanted to assimilate, knowing that it was in their best interests.

Unfortunately, that culture is changing, as people who aren't fond of our uniqueness have gained influence. These are the people who are far more likely to point at our sins of the past, as if we are the only country with sins in its history. They'll say that the Founding Fathers were "rich white slave rapers" as a way to discredit our Constitution, to make it ripe for significant change.

E Pluribus Unum is dead. Or at least on life support.
.
"They'll say that the Founding Fathers were "rich white slave rapers" as a way to discredit our Constitution..."

No, but that just happens to be true, now isn't it? You don't want the truth spoken, that to be truly honest you have to deal with the fact that now long dead men wrote "All Men Are Created Equal" at the very same time they owned humans like livestock? Speaking the truth is just another example of how people might say they respect the individual but that's only true if they believe the same right-wing bullshit they do.

When they can defend a Muslim mass prayer on the courthouse steps, while two men kiss in the background and a Satanist holds a black mass, then I'll believe them. That is liberty and they can't stand the very idea of it.
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.


How old are you, child -- 15? Your recitation of a bunch of buzz terms indicates you are the very antithesis of a free thinking individual.

There is nothing the least bit fascistic in the expectation that we retain the cohesive essence of our melting pot society rather than allow ourselves to be reduced to a bunch of warring tribes.

Especially considering the primitive and extremely illiberal cultural values you seek to preserve, you are actually warring against the liberalization process rather than acting as a liberal. This is the entire problem with this new authoritarian left - you morons claim to be liberal, but align yourself with those who wish to destroy liberalism forever.
The people attempting, and failing, to destroy liberalism are morons like the OP and Trump voters, totalitarian thugs bent on making everyone stand for the pledge and salute the flag instead of burning it in protest, which they want to make a federal crime.

I stand only with those who defend liberty. Your kind never does, that would mean things like gays getting married, street preachers shouting at passing cars, and Muslims being called to prayer. You both are drones and you want more of the same.

Want to prove that you aren't a drone? Defend Muslim women wearing the burka in public here? That's freedom, that's liberty, that's liberalism and you hate the very idea of it.




".... totalitarian thugs..."

You cannot create your own meaning for commonly defined terms.

The totalitarian thugs would be collectivists who attack those who don't march in lock-step.


They are the Liberals, Socialists, Communists, Nazis, Fascists and Progressives who share the mistaken view some Utopia which, as history has proven, is actually a dystopia.

100 million men, women and children were slaughtered in the last century under the auspices of the Soviet cousins of modern Liberals.
 
1. The colloquial usage of 'Liberal,' as meant today, refers to the Socialist Party...

Stop making bullshit up, very few liberals support socialist party and most commonly associate with Democrat party.

That's like me claiming that "conservative" means theocrats or anarchists.
 
Last edited:
No one is forced to assimilate. That is a cultural phenomenon, something that all of us facilitate in agreement that this is such a unique country. People have always wanted to assimilate, knowing that it was in their best interests.

Unfortunately, that culture is changing, as people who aren't fond of our uniqueness have gained influence. These are the people who are far more likely to point at our sins of the past, as if we are the only country with sins in its history. They'll say that the Founding Fathers were "rich white slave rapers" as a way to discredit our Constitution, to make it ripe for significant change.

E Pluribus Unum is dead. Or at least on life support.
.
"They'll say that the Founding Fathers were "rich white slave rapers" as a way to discredit our Constitution..."

No, but that just happens to be true, now isn't it? You don't want the truth spoken, that to be truly honest you have to deal with the fact that now long dead men wrote "All Men Are Created Equal" at the very same time they owned humans like livestock? Speaking the truth is just another example of how people might say they respect the individual but that's only true if they believe the same right-wing bullshit they do.

When they can defend a Muslim mass prayer on the courthouse steps, while two men kiss in the background and a Satanist holds a black mass, then I'll believe them. That is liberty and they can't stand the very idea of it.
Great example, thanks.
.
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.

Assimilation is not rightwing or fascist, of an important aspect of migrants integrating into American melting pot, but so is TOLERANCE and as with most things in life this is not a question of absolutes nutters want to make it about but balance between the two.
We are not a melting pot, we are a stew. And their version of "assimilation" is accept the same right-wing bullshit we do, including our God, and hate where you can from because this is the only good country to ever exist. If you accept the very premise of America, a premise based solely upon liberalism, then welcome. Funny thing is, the drones here don't accept that, they hate individualism as then there are men kissing other men in public, people running around saying Jesus is bullshit, and kids who discover that religion is for idiots and America isn't the greatest nation on earth. That doesn't fit in their Nazi version of America the Beautiful at all.

If they respected individualism they'd respect liberalism, the core philosophy that created the very idea of individualism, and they hate it instead. They are fascists, they just don't know it. All you have to do is ask them if it's perfectly fine not to stand for the national anthem, which is fascist in and of itself. They will never answer in the positive for the individual. They want happy flag-waving drones not people how might say boy does America suck on it _____.



Watch your language.

It reveals the angst of a lost argument.
 
I will let the liberals who founded this nation know you disapprove of them. Did they get with the program? Did they assimilate into the British Colony or did they tell the powers that be to go fuck themselves? You want a nation of mindless drones who all cut and paste like you do instead of thinking. No thanks.


"I will let the liberals who founded this nation know you disapprove of them."

1. The colloquial usage of 'Liberal,' as meant today, refers to the Socialist Party....not to the classical liberals who founded this nation....they would be known as conservatives.

Easy enough to prove:
Conservatives endorse individualism, limited constitutional government, and free markets.


Which of these groups stands for those views:
Liberals, Progressives, Democrats.

Right...none of them.




Because you are so slow-witted, you accept every lie of the Left.

2. The 'Greatest Lie" is the one that the modern Liberals tell. They claim that those called Liberals today are the liberals who founded this great nation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Founders were 'classical liberals,' whose vision included . individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. That's why they wrote out a detailed Constitution.

a. Communist John Dewey, the one who corrupted education in this country, convinced the Socialist Party to change its name to 'Liberal.' And it's values and doctrines formed those called Liberals today.




The benefit to them, of course, is that the uninformed attribute the greatness of the Founders, of America, to them.

Now....which 'Liberals' today espouse individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Certainly not the socialists/communists known as the Democrat Party
I won't respond to copy and paste beyond this.

Tell us what dislike of liberalism: Definition of LIBERALISM
 
Assimilation is a right-wing fascist kind of thing that goes directly against Individualism, Freedom, and Liberty to be who you are. Mutual respect for those three concepts is what you need and not what you want, a mass of unthinking, xenophobic, nationalistic, flag-wavers afraid of free-thinking people with respect for their cultural heritage within the larger society.

It's no shock that free-thinkers scare the hell out of you, anyone who thinks at all scares the hell out of you since you are unable to.

Assimilation is not rightwing or fascist, of an important aspect of migrants integrating into American melting pot, but so is TOLERANCE and as with most things in life this is not a question of absolutes nutters want to make it about but balance between the two.
We are not a melting pot, we are a stew. And their version of "assimilation" is accept the same right-wing bullshit we do, including our God, and hate where you can from because this is the only good country to ever exist. If you accept the very premise of America, a premise based solely upon liberalism, then welcome. Funny thing is, the drones here don't accept that, they hate individualism as then there are men kissing other men in public, people running around saying Jesus is bullshit, and kids who discover that religion is for idiots and America isn't the greatest nation on earth. That doesn't fit in their Nazi version of America the Beautiful at all.

If they respected individualism they'd respect liberalism, the core philosophy that created the very idea of individualism, and they hate it instead. They are fascists, they just don't know it. All you have to do is ask them if it's perfectly fine not to stand for the national anthem, which is fascist in and of itself. They will never answer in the positive for the individual. They want happy flag-waving drones not people how might say boy does America suck on it _____.



Watch your language.

It reveals the angst of a lost argument.
Fuck you, bitch. See, yet again, you don't want individuals, they might swear, you want drones who do and say only what you approve of.
 

Forum List

Back
Top