The Latest Conservative Hot Take; Greta Thunberg Is Like Hitler

Never realized Hitler was such an environmentalist


I honestly have no idea about Hitler's environmental policies. Couldn't care less.


It's his genocide and warmongering and totalitarian oppression that defines him, imo. Same as Marxists.


That is my point. Would you care to address it, or are you just here to show how retarded you can be?
 
It's a mystery to you. Imagine I was going around calling everything I don't like Zoroastrianism. I really don't know what they believe but it sounds pretty ominous.

People would ask you why you are comparing them. You would not be able to justify your comparisons. You would look like a fucking retard.


IN this thread, I easily justified the comparison.


All you've done is try to gin up some issue of semantics to distract from how good my point was.


Libtards are scum of the earth like that.
 
People would ask you why you are comparing them. You would not be able to justify your comparisons. You would look like a fucking retard.


IN this thread, I easily justified the comparison.


All you've done is try to gin up some issue of semantics to distract from how good my point was.


Libtards are scum of the earth like that.
You still have not demonstrated you know anything about marxism as an ideology. Communal living. No private property. Local democratic governance. No central state. No military. Strict rule of law. Does any of that ring a bell at all?
 
You still have not demonstrated you know anything about marxism as an ideology. Communal living. No private property. Local democratic governance. No central state. No military. Strict rule of law. Does any of that ring a bell at all?


Yes, it does. My focus was more on the genocide and totalitarian oppression.


So, in the context of this thread, what did your post contribute?
 
I honestly have no idea about Hitler's environmental policies. Couldn't care less.


It's his genocide and warmongering and totalitarian oppression that defines him, imo. Same as Marxists.


That is my point. Would you care to address it, or are you just here to show how retarded you can be?
You brought it up
 
Yes, it does. My focus was more on the genocide and totalitarian oppression.


So, in the context of this thread, what did your post contribute?
That's not an ideology. It's just what nation states do during some point in their history. The very presence of a centralized state makes it something else besides Marxism. He envisioned an unlikely agrarian utopia of simple communal living free from distant authoritarian rulers and endless warfare.
 
That's not an ideology. It's just what nation states do during some point in their history. The very presence of a centralized state makes it something else besides Marxism. He envisioned an unlikely agrarian utopia of simple communal living free from distant authoritarian rulers and endless warfare.


Yeah. That is what he envisioned. THe fact remains that that all the attempts to put the ideology into practice, had a strong, centralized government, and in quite a lot of the tries, things went dark,


real fast.


You might be willing to overlook a strong tendency towards mass murder, genocide and totalitarian oppression, but I am not.

AND, more to the point,


it makes the Hitler comparison, completely reasonable.


So, why the fuck you whining about it?


Oh, I get it. YOu are "triggered" by us casting Marxism in a bad light?


Well, try to grow a thicker skin. And stop derailing the thread with off topic nonsense, about how marxism, " is supposed to be".
 
Yeah. That is what he envisioned. THe fact remains that that all the attempts to put the ideology into practice, had a strong, centralized government, and in quite a lot of the tries, things went dark,


real fast.


You might be willing to overlook a strong tendency towards mass murder, genocide and totalitarian oppression, but I am not.

AND, more to the point,


it makes the Hitler comparison, completely reasonable.


So, why the fuck you whining about it?


Oh, I get it. YOu are "triggered" by us casting Marxism in a bad light?


Well, try to grow a thicker skin. And stop derailing the thread with off topic nonsense, about how marxism, " is supposed to be".
I am going to take this moment to remind you that Marx was never a political leader. He just wrote some books that barely even sold while he was alive. Every nation on this earth has been a slaughterhouse at times. It was not on account of any particular ideology other than the oldest ideology: Killing people is the easiest way to take what they have. Goes back at least ten thousand years before Marx came along.
 
Yes, imagine if this little girl had enough power—the horrible things she would do to people. Like give them good-paying green-energy jobs, reduce the amount of deadly particulate matter in the air they breathe, invest heavily in a renewable energy economy, take on the worst excesses of the fossil fuel industry, and—worst of all—sharply reduce greenhouse-gas emissions in order to secure a sustainable future for her generation and generations to come. Horrors!

Where are the adults, indeed? Because they sure as shit aren’t on BlazeTV, now are they?

Her parents should be charged with child abuse. Anyone who takes her seriously is at a grade level a couple below her own.
 
I am going to take this moment to remind you that Marx was never a political leader. He just wrote some books that barely even sold while he was alive. Every nation on this earth has been a slaughterhouse at times. It was not on account of any particular ideology other than the oldest ideology: Killing people is the easiest way to take what they have. Goes back at least ten thousand years before Marx came along.



When marxist take over, it always gets worse. That is a pretty good trick. Even Islam has some examples when they can point to and brag about.


The point remains. Comparing a marxist to Hitler, is completely reasonable.
 
They raised a little girl who is intolerant of world leaders who lack the spine to make tough decisions and do what is right
And you think that's OK? What about sports? Playing with her friends? Dolls? Trucks? Makeup? Dressup? Boys?

Concern about social issues is good but where's the balance? She's been used by so many radicals just to get her in front of cameras crying about things she doesn't even understand. It's a terribly sad thing to watch a child so abused and taken advantage of.
 
That's not an ideology. It's just what nation states do during some point in their history. The very presence of a centralized state makes it something else besides Marxism. He envisioned an unlikely agrarian utopia of simple communal living free from distant authoritarian rulers and endless warfare.
You've never actually read Marx, have you? He envisioned a society where everything is owned by the State. He had a pipe dream about some possible future state after the leaders of the communist revolution in any given country established the State and took control of education, production, and all else. The dream was, after the initial central communist state, was that those in power would then give up their power and the power would go to the communities.. everyone would just naturally work together.

Of course that never happened. Never once did any communist leaders give up their central power once they had it. That's really too bad, too, because it leaves people like you thinking that communism can work if only we do it your way. Because the leaders never gave up that power we never got to see just how badly the next phase of communism would fail.

Imagine people all just working together, no leaders, no government, somehow just the right enough people raise potatoes while just the right amount of other people make iron pots, and there's just enough of everything for every one. And no one cheats or tries to get their share without doing their share of the work... Oh, wait... That IS what you imagine.

You think that could actually come to pass. If only we do Marx better than all those others who did Marx... You know.. Your way of doing Marx...Yes, that's the ticket.
 
Read history and use your head. All of those government types subjugate the rights of their civilians.

Thus, they are all fundamentally the same.

Then, here's where you have to actually think for yourself, how can you have leftwing totalitarian government, and rightwing totalitarian government, and not have no government anywhere on the spectrum?
translation: you prefer your personal supposition and conjecture to historical fact and reality.

Here's the thing: there are the Marxist-Lenin type socialist who morphed into Communism like China and the old USSR bloc countries. Other countries, like Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Great Britain, Canada, the Netherlands, Spain, Ireland, Belgium, Switzerland, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand all incorporate socialism into their governmental framework. They're known as social democracies. Then you have your capitalist countries that morphed into fascist dictatorships like the Philippines under Marcos, or the old Nicuargua, or El Salvador, or Pinochet's Chile, or Iran under the Shah.

This is why I referred you to the dictionary. Once you get your definitions straight, then you can see how they apply to the real world. Hopefully, what I showed you here will help.
 

Forum List

Back
Top