The Latest Conservative Hot Take; Greta Thunberg Is Like Hitler

[woodwork201]

Do you think they'll give her puberty blockers to keep her from growing up? She's a value property prepubescent. Can't have her with hormones making her attracted to anything other than her hate.

 

[Blues Man]

More smoke blowing....seems that's all you trolls have, because you sure as hell are incapable discussing fact based content. Trolls annoy me....thank God for the IA button.

Nothing she says has added anything new to the topic of climate. That you think some little entitled brat is an authority is the problem here

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you think they'll give her puberty blockers to keep her from growing up? She's a value property prepubescent. Can't have her with hormones making her attracted to anything other than her hate.

Those Democrats.....they love the children.....then send their checks into Planned Parenthood.


Well....some children:

 

[Sunsettommy]

They have raised a lovely, intelligent young lady who is respected by everyone except bitter Conservatives

No, they USED her for PR purposes and to con the gullible like YOU and other science deficient cultists into supporting something that doesn't exist it is the ultimate CON game, and you are completely unaware of it.

Meanwhile they disrespect Dr. Curry at the same time:

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, they USED her for PR purposes and to con the gullible like YOU and other science deficient cultists into supporting something that doesn't exist it is the ultimate CON game, and you are completely unaware of it.

Meanwhile they disrespect Dr. Curry at the same time:

View attachment 604532

And, her most memorable statement.....

 

[shoshi]

Greta is mentally ill by her own admission. i do not take seriously what she says.

 

[rightwinger]

No, they USED her for PR purposes and to con the gullible like YOU and other science deficient cultists into supporting something that doesn't exist it is the ultimate CON game, and you are completely unaware of it.

Meanwhile they disrespect Dr. Curry at the same time:

View attachment 604532

Only she doesn’t say it is a hoax

Judith Curry - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

On the one hand, she accepts that the planet is warming, that human-generated greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide cause warming, and that the plausible worst-case scenario is potentially catastrophic, but on the other hand, she also proposes that the rate of warming is slower than climate models have projected, emphasizes her evaluation of the uncertainty in the climate prediction models, and questions whether climate change mitigation is affordable.

 

[Papageorgio]

I hope her mental illness gets better, learns to smile and not take the world so seriously.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Only she doesn’t say it is a hoax

Judith Curry - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Ha ha ha she doesn't toe the warmist/alarmist line anymore, she once swallowed the "big oil" lies but learned that she was being misled has learned to listen to climate realists' viewpoints thus moderated her position and dropped the "big oil" funding line as she knows it is false.

It is clear you don't read her numerous blogs posting she made in recent years showing her significant moderation on CO2 effects.

Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: Climate Change is ‘not a clear and present danger’​

That was THREE YEARS ago, you are badly out of date...

The Child doesn't know shit about the topic she reads from a script given to her, please don't be this stupid.

 

[rightwinger]

Ha ha ha she doesn't toe the warmist/alarmist line anymore, she once swallowed the "big oil" lies but learned that she was being misled has learned to listen to climate realists' viewpoints thus moderated her position and dropped the "big oil" funding line as she knows it is false.

It is clear you don't read her numerous blogs posting she made in recent years showing her significant moderation on CO2 effects.

Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: Climate Change is ‘not a clear and present danger’​

That was THREE YEARS ago, you are badly out of date...

The Child doesn't know shit about the topic she reads from a script given to her, please don't be this stupid.

Not watching a 23 min video

 

[Sunsettommy]

Only she doesn’t say it is a hoax

Judith Curry - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

On the one hand, she accepts that the planet is warming, that human-generated greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide cause warming, and that the plausible worst-case scenario is potentially catastrophic, but on the other hand, she also proposes that the rate of warming is slower than climate models have projected, emphasizes her evaluation of the uncertainty in the climate prediction models, and questions whether climate change mitigation is affordable.

Wikipedia is LYING since she is on record from her own mouth saying very differently,

Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: Climate Change is ‘not a clear and present danger’​

It appears you haven't kept up since she has a long running BLOG where she repeatedly shows a moderate and INDEPENDENT view of the subject, not given to making apocalyptic statements.

Select postings:

How we have mischaracterized climate risk​

IPCC AR6: Breaking the hegemony of global climate models​

The IPCC’s attribution methodology is fundamentally flawed​

New Confirmation that Climate Models Overstate Atmospheric Warming​

North Atlantic Nonsense​

on and on it goes, your ignorance is well exposed.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Not watching a 23 min video

It is a PODCAST

"My latest podcast – this one has some eye-opening discussion.

Dr. Judith Curry is a climatologist, former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology and president of Climate Forecast Applications Network. She is in the forefront of the climate skeptic movement, often drawing fire from others in the scientific community. Dr. Curry and Anthony Watts discuss her experience within the scientific community, changes in sea-level and how climate change is not a clear and present danger."

You didn't bother to click on the link I gave you it is why you remain IGNORANT!

 

[rightwinger]

Wikipedia is LYING since she is on record from her own mouth saying very differently,

Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: Climate Change is ‘not a clear and present danger’​

It appears you haven't kept up since she has a long running BLOG where she repeatedly shows a moderate and INDEPENDENT view of the subject, not given to making apocalyptic statements.

Select postings:

How we have mischaracterized climate risk​

IPCC AR6: Breaking the hegemony of global climate models​

The IPCC’s attribution methodology is fundamentally flawed​

New Confirmation that Climate Models Overstate Atmospheric Warming​

North Atlantic Nonsense​

on and on it goes, your ignorance is well exposed.

Basically, she is saying we don’t know for sure
She is not dismissing mans contribution to Climate Change, only our reaction to it.

For less dire threats that are considered intolerable, not withstanding the benefits, risk management should be focused on banning or phasing out the activity creating the risk or, if that is not possible, to mitigate or fight the risk in other ways or to increase societal resilience.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Basically, she is saying we don’t know for sure
She is not dismissing mans contribution to Climate Change, only our reaction to it.

For less dire threats that are considered intolerable, not withstanding the benefits, risk management should be focused on banning or phasing out the activity creating the risk or, if that is not possible, to mitigate or fight the risk in other ways or to increase societal resilience.

I did state she MODERATED her position yes; she thinks CO2 has some effects so do I, but I see no danger and neither does she which she makes clear over and over in her blog.

But Man-made warming claims she disputes since NO ONE has shown that Humans cause all the warming, but it can be shown quite easily that we contribute a small amount and nothing more.

Go read those postings I gave you where it shows she isn't toeing the climate emergency/we are doomed message; it is all bullshit!

 

[rightwinger]

But Man-made warming claims she disputes since NO ONE has shown that Humans cause all the warming, but it can be shown quite easily that we contribute a small amount and nothing more.

Nobody s claiming that we cause all warming. Only that we are contributing to it

The portion we contribute to, we have control over

 

[Sunsettommy]

Nobody s claiming that we cause all warming. Only that we are contributing to it

The portion we contribute to, we have control over

Ok, but our portion in part is unavoidable and over all we contribute little warming anyway thus no climate emergency developing.

 

[abu afak]

Nobody s claiming that we cause all warming. Only that we are contributing to it

The portion we contribute to, we have control over

Actually we may not only be responsible for All the warming, but ie, 150% of it.
Some scientists think the 20th C would have actually been cooler were it not for Human belched GHGs trapping the heat.
People never really think about that plausible possibility and are stuck at only 100% by lack of imagination/fair consideration.

`

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Basically, she is saying we don’t know for sure
She is not dismissing mans contribution to Climate Change, only our reaction to it.

Burn the witch!!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Actually we may not only be responsible for All the warming, but ie, 150% of it.
Some scientists think the 20th C would have actually been cooler were it not for Human belched GHGs trapping the heat.
People never really think about that plausible possibility and are stuck at only 100% by lack of imagination/fair consideration.

`

The only thing worse than retreating glaciers is advancing glaciers.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

No, they USED her for PR purposes and to con the gullible like YOU and other science deficient cultists into supporting something that doesn't exist it is the ultimate CON game, and you are completely unaware of it.

Meanwhile they disrespect Dr. Curry at the same time:

View attachment 604532

Judith Curry?? Too funny~

Judith Curry abandons science

But I’m glad the GOP chose her as a witness for a climate hearing

archive.thinkprogress.org

Climate misinformation by source: Judith Curry

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.

skepticalscience.com

Dr. Judith Curry resigns - CFACT

Dr. Judith Curry, a respected climate scientist, has announced her resignation from her tenured position at Georgia Tech. She's had enough of the politics and propaganda that beset climate science.

www.cfact.org

Climate Etc – Judith Curry - Bias and Credibility

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Judith Curry owns Climate Etc. Donations fund the website.

Analysis / Bias​

The majority of articles reviewed minimize or deny the impacts of human-driven climate change. According to a Scientific American interview, Judith Curry admits to receiving funding from the fossil fuel industry. This article also labeled her a “climate heretic.” Further, Republicans have also invited Judith Curry to testify at climate change hearings regarding alleged uncertainties regarding man-made climate change. Finally, Skeptical Science has labeled Judith Curry as a “Climate Misinformer.”
The website publishes blog posts by Judith Curry related to climate change, and they provide links to other sources that also promote human-influenced climate change denial, such as Watts Up With That and John Stossel who is not even remotely a climate scientist. The consensus of climate scientists is that climate change is human-influenced and this site minimizes that assessment. They have also failed numerous fact checks.

Failed Fact Checks​

• “The Earth is not warming.” – Pants on Fire
• “It is an empirical fact that the Earth’s climate has warmed overall for at least the past century. However, we do not know how much humans have contributed to this warming, and there is disagreement among scientists as to whether human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases is the dominant cause of recent warming, relative to natural causes” – Misleading
• “And even the IPCC says more than half. That’s from 51 percent to 99 percent. That is a big interval… I just don’t know how much is human vs. how much is natural, and I think there is a great deal of uncertainty and it is very difficult to untangle it” – Incorrect
• “Current global climate models are not fit for the purpose of attributing the causes of recent warming or for predicting global or regional climate change on timescales of decades to centuries, with any high level of confidence.” – Incorrect
• “It’s been warming for hundreds of years! And we can’t explain all of that due to human causes..” – Misleading