todd down under
Senior Member
- Sep 18, 2024
- 193
- 181
- 58
LOL. You need to learn it.Nope fact
You need to learn the difference


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL. You need to learn it.Nope fact
You need to learn the difference
More deception Allen. Your grandpa Dulles taught you well, though it no longer works.She was not KGB
They did not welcome him
He did nothing illegal when he went to the USSR and returned
You miss the point dumbass.More deception Allen. Your grandpa Dulles taught you well, though it no longer works.
No one stated Oswald’s emigration to the USSR and return at the height of the Cold War was illegal.
So dumb. Your ridiculous propaganda isn’t working.You miss the point dumbass.
It was not illegal which is why he was allowed to return
hey moron you just admitted it was not illegalSo dumb. Your ridiculous propaganda isn’t working.
Nonsense.That's an opinion.
You're posting nonsense. It wasn't a difficult shot-less than 100 yards, on a target moving slowly. (I'm not sure why he even used a scope-id rather have had iron sights on a different rifle...for the money, probably the superb SMLE.) Which I'm not a fan of the Carcano, the 6.5x52mm round is effective to far longer ranges and the rifle was accurate enough. Three shots in 6 seconds for a bolt action isn't anything impressive-I saw teenagers do that at Boy Scout camp.Alan Dulles the third here try’s to convince everybody the best marksmen in the world did not say he could not have made the shot but as we both know he indeed did say those very words.![]()
With the release of volumes of Kennedy Assassination documents, I wonder why nobody talks about MY issue.
I don't think that the shot that killed Kennedy was humanly possible. Hitting a pumpkin moving at 40mph from that distance WITH ONE SHOT??????
I'm just not buying it. Never have.
Anyone else believe that a human marksman made that shot?
It could if he was linked to the Israelis, they hated Kennedy as did the US deep state.A name does not prove a crime or criminal involvement
Because they needed a Patsy like they did for the Luther King shooting, all this happened at the same time in history when fascist nutters like Hoover were running the FBI and other deep state intelligence services, i would class the Kennedy killing as a Coup d' etat in the US.The rifle was apparently an old WW2 vintage Carcano, mail ordered from some surplus store. Oswald was apparently a pretty good shot though. He killed a Texas Police Officer during his attempted getaway so he was guilty or thought he was guilty of JFK's murder. The big question is why the CIA and the FBI welcomed a traitor back from Russia with his KGB bride during the cldest part of the Cold War.
It could if he was linked to the Israelis, they hated Kennedy as did the US deep state.
he was no patsy he actually did kill KennedyBecause they needed a Patsy like they did for the Luther King shooting, all this happened at the same time in history when fascist nutters like Hoover were running the FBI and other deep state intelligence services, i would class the Kennedy killing as a Coup d' etat in the US.
You seem quite fanatical about anyone who questions that, were you in the book depository with Oswald?he was no patsy he actually did kill Kennedy
Having been in the Book Depository Building and looking out the window, the President's car had to slow to a crawl to make the turn just beneath the building, then gradually pick up speed again as it straightened out.....not a marksman myself but it looked much closer than you think and fairly easy for an expert to draw a bead for that first shot at least. The other 2 may have been more difficult but that car was crawling when the shooter first took aim.With the release of volumes of Kennedy Assassination documents, I wonder why nobody talks about MY issue.
I don't think that the shot that killed Kennedy was humanly possible. Hitting a pumpkin moving at 40mph from that distance WITH ONE SHOT??????
I'm just not buying it. Never have.
Anyone else believe that a human marksman made that shot?
You seem fanatical to blame others without evidenceYou seem quite fanatical about anyone who questions that, were you in the book depository with Oswald?
It was a difficult shot using a bolt action shitty cheap ass rifle, supposedly firing three rounds in a few seconds.You're posting nonsense. It wasn't a difficult shot-less than 100 yards, on a target moving slowly. (I'm not sure why he even used a scope-id rather have had iron sights on a different rifle...for the money, probably the superb SMLE.) Which I'm not a fan of the Carcano, the 6.5x52mm round is effective to far longer ranges and the rifle was accurate enough. Three shots in 6 seconds for a bolt action isn't anything impressive-I saw teenagers do that at Boy Scout camp.
His grandpa Dulles probably was. Or maybe his godfather Angleton.You seem quite fanatical about anyone who questions that, were you in the book depository with Oswald?
It was a difficult shot...
...using a bolt action shitty cheap ass rifle...
...supposedly firing three rounds in a few seconds.
Meaningless anyway, since the kill shot came from the front.
1. Oswald was not an expert marksman. Most reports state he was a poor shooterNo, that's a lie.
Lie. The Carcano is perfectly capable of that shot.
Not at all difficult. I saw teens at Boy Scout camp who could do it.
More lies.