Trump "would not, in fact, be OK with it" "it" being Vance said "the president would be OK with releasing the nipple-related documents": Epstein files

[frigidweirdo]

Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout

The president’s top advisers gathered in a series of Situation Room meetings as they struggled to contain a scandal engulfing Donald Trump himself.

www.nytimes.com

The White House had meeting about the Epstein files. All the big dogs were there, except Trump.

"“This is a huge problem,” [Vance} told the group."

"Vance told the group he believed all the files should be released as soon as possible."

"If the administration got out ahead of this and released everything voluntarily — including whatever material existed about the president — it would at least get credit for transparency. "

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

"Even the unsubstantiated allegations and anecdotes about Trump should go out, Vance argued. They were going to surface regardless, and if the administration published them first, it would demonstrate good faith and take the oxygen out of the conspiracy theories. His arguments fell on skeptical ears,"

"
Warrington, the White House counsel, responded by laying out the available choices, without advocating any of them. Maxwell could be given a pardon, he said, or she could have her sentence reduced.

At that, several around the table spoke up to register their strong disapproval.

“Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge P.R. problem,” Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of a pardon, the Epstein accusers would be fanning out on TV, telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds."

"Just then, The Wall Street Journal article they had been trying to kill was published online."

"detailed how Trump, and many others, had created birthday cards and letters to be assembled by Maxwell into a special birthday book for Epstein in 2003. "

"In the days before publication, Trump, in the effort to quash the story, had called News Corp.’s chief executive, Robert Thomson; News Corp.’s owner, Rupert Murdoch; and The Journal’s editor in chief, Emma Tucker. Practically shouting, the president told Tucker, who is British, that she must “hate America.” He told her he would file a lawsuit."

Why would Trump want the story quashed if it wasn't true?

Here's the file

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This came up:

"

EFTA02795303.pdf​

Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her "pert nipples"....Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together she showed me her nipples."

"Page not found"

Why is this page not found? This is definitely something that should have been released.

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This file has "Trump" and "nipples" in it. (not together Trump was just introduced to a 14 year old girl who was being touched by GM and JE). But does not show up on a search of "Trump nipples" either.


The facts here are: Vance suggested releasing files that had allegations against Trump.
The person who made the allegations is Sarah Ransome who had claimed she had sex videos of Trump, but then later on said she didn't have any.
People around Trump who are not Vance suggested that Trump would not be happy for such a file to be released.
The file was not released before the Epstein files were released and is not available now (the file cannot be accessed, but the first part of the file can be seen)
A search on the Epstein files for "Trump nipples" nothing comes up. But it's quite clear there's a document with "Trump" and "nipples" in the Epstein files.

So, essentially why would Trump not take on Vance's advice? Why would Trump call up people to try and get the story taken down? Why would Trump fight so hard against the Epstein files?

Actions speak louder than words.

And the actions of the MAGA who respond will basically be "Trump did nothing". But Trump did a lot, he fought against releasing a file that we cannot see even though Congress told him to release this file. That's breaking the law. Why would he break the law?

Trump Hit By Explosive Claim of 'Secret Tapes' as Epstein Victim Alleges Damaging Teenager Footage Exists

A new claim from an Epstein victim alleges the existence of secret tapes involving Donald Trump, potentially forcing his resignation. The unverified allegations have reignited debate over withheld Epstein evidence.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge P.R. problem,” Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of a pardon, the Epstein accusers would be fanning out on TV, telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds."

The Trump regime was worried only about bad PR – the regime couldn’t care less about the victims.

 

[1srelluc]

TL;DR

 

[theHawk]

Yet another claim by a debunked liar.

But the left doesn’t care. If someone makes up a lie about Trump, it must be true.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The Trump regime was worried only about bad PR – the regime couldn’t care less about the victims.

Yeah, though I also get the feeling that Trump fears people finding out the truth, that he had his way with underaged girls.

We've got different girls saying the same thing about Trump.

 

[frigidweirdo]

TL;DR

There's no "N" in that for "nipples".

 

[frigidweirdo]

Yet another claim by a debunked liar.

But the left doesn’t care. If someone makes up a lie about Trump, it must be true.

Did you see the facts? No? Can't read that far down a post?

And it hasn't been "debunked", it's been "ridiculed" because if you ended up with Epstein, you're a whore or something, so you're clearly not speaking the truth, according to the BIGGEST ******* LIAR EVER TO BE PRESIDENT.

You trust one liar, but then the other one has been "debunked".

 

[theHawk]

Did you see the facts? No? Can't read that far down a post?

And it hasn't been "debunked", it's been "ridiculed" because if you ended up with Epstein, you're a whore or something, so you're clearly not speaking the truth, according to the BIGGEST ******* LIAR EVER TO BE PRESIDENT.

You trust one liar, but then the other one has been "debunked".

The article clearly said the accuser had already lied about having a “sex tape” of Trump.

Get lost, idiot.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout

The president’s top advisers gathered in a series of Situation Room meetings as they struggled to contain a scandal engulfing Donald Trump himself.

www.nytimes.com

The White House had meeting about the Epstein files. All the big dogs were there, except Trump.

"“This is a huge problem,” [Vance} told the group."

"Vance told the group he believed all the files should be released as soon as possible."

"If the administration got out ahead of this and released everything voluntarily — including whatever material existed about the president — it would at least get credit for transparency. "

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

"Even the unsubstantiated allegations and anecdotes about Trump should go out, Vance argued. They were going to surface regardless, and if the administration published them first, it would demonstrate good faith and take the oxygen out of the conspiracy theories. His arguments fell on skeptical ears,"

"
Warrington, the White House counsel, responded by laying out the available choices, without advocating any of them. Maxwell could be given a pardon, he said, or she could have her sentence reduced.

At that, several around the table spoke up to register their strong disapproval.

“Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge P.R. problem,” Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of a pardon, the Epstein accusers would be fanning out on TV, telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds."

"Just then, The Wall Street Journal article they had been trying to kill was published online."

"detailed how Trump, and many others, had created birthday cards and letters to be assembled by Maxwell into a special birthday book for Epstein in 2003. "

"In the days before publication, Trump, in the effort to quash the story, had called News Corp.’s chief executive, Robert Thomson; News Corp.’s owner, Rupert Murdoch; and The Journal’s editor in chief, Emma Tucker. Practically shouting, the president told Tucker, who is British, that she must “hate America.” He told her he would file a lawsuit."

Why would Trump want the story quashed if it wasn't true?

Here's the file

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This came up:

"

EFTA02795303.pdf​

Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her "pert nipples"....Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together she showed me her nipples."

"Page not found"

Why is this page not found? This is definitely something that should have been released.

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This file has "Trump" and "nipples" in it. (not together Trump was just introduced to a 14 year old girl who was being touched by GM and JE). But does not show up on a search of "Trump nipples" either.


The facts here are: Vance suggested releasing files that had allegations against Trump.
The person who made the allegations is Sarah Ransome who had claimed she had sex videos of Trump, but then later on said she didn't have any.
People around Trump who are not Vance suggested that Trump would not be happy for such a file to be released.
The file was not released before the Epstein files were released and is not available now (the file cannot be accessed, but the first part of the file can be seen)
A search on the Epstein files for "Trump nipples" nothing comes up. But it's quite clear there's a document with "Trump" and "nipples" in the Epstein files.

So, essentially why would Trump not take on Vance's advice? Why would Trump call up people to try and get the story taken down? Why would Trump fight so hard against the Epstein files?

Actions speak louder than words.

And the actions of the MAGA who respond will basically be "Trump did nothing". But Trump did a lot, he fought against releasing a file that we cannot see even though Congress told him to release this file. That's breaking the law. Why would he break the law?

Trump Hit By Explosive Claim of 'Secret Tapes' as Epstein Victim Alleges Damaging Teenager Footage Exists

A new claim from an Epstein victim alleges the existence of secret tapes involving Donald Trump, potentially forcing his resignation. The unverified allegations have reignited debate over withheld Epstein evidence.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

Dude, you are reduced to google searching "Trump nipples," so it is past time for you to seek help.

How do you have all those details and exact quotes from a white house meeting? did someone send you a video?

 

[Invisibleflash]

Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout

The president’s top advisers gathered in a series of Situation Room meetings as they struggled to contain a scandal engulfing Donald Trump himself.

www.nytimes.com

The White House had meeting about the Epstein files. All the big dogs were there, except Trump.

"“This is a huge problem,” [Vance} told the group."

"Vance told the group he believed all the files should be released as soon as possible."

"If the administration got out ahead of this and released everything voluntarily — including whatever material existed about the president — it would at least get credit for transparency. "

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

"Even the unsubstantiated allegations and anecdotes about Trump should go out, Vance argued. They were going to surface regardless, and if the administration published them first, it would demonstrate good faith and take the oxygen out of the conspiracy theories. His arguments fell on skeptical ears,"

"
Warrington, the White House counsel, responded by laying out the available choices, without advocating any of them. Maxwell could be given a pardon, he said, or she could have her sentence reduced.

At that, several around the table spoke up to register their strong disapproval.

“Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge P.R. problem,” Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of a pardon, the Epstein accusers would be fanning out on TV, telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds."

"Just then, The Wall Street Journal article they had been trying to kill was published online."

"detailed how Trump, and many others, had created birthday cards and letters to be assembled by Maxwell into a special birthday book for Epstein in 2003. "

"In the days before publication, Trump, in the effort to quash the story, had called News Corp.’s chief executive, Robert Thomson; News Corp.’s owner, Rupert Murdoch; and The Journal’s editor in chief, Emma Tucker. Practically shouting, the president told Tucker, who is British, that she must “hate America.” He told her he would file a lawsuit."

Why would Trump want the story quashed if it wasn't true?

Here's the file

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This came up:

"

EFTA02795303.pdf​

Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her "pert nipples"....Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together she showed me her nipples."

"Page not found"

Why is this page not found? This is definitely something that should have been released.

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This file has "Trump" and "nipples" in it. (not together Trump was just introduced to a 14 year old girl who was being touched by GM and JE). But does not show up on a search of "Trump nipples" either.


The facts here are: Vance suggested releasing files that had allegations against Trump.
The person who made the allegations is Sarah Ransome who had claimed she had sex videos of Trump, but then later on said she didn't have any.
People around Trump who are not Vance suggested that Trump would not be happy for such a file to be released.
The file was not released before the Epstein files were released and is not available now (the file cannot be accessed, but the first part of the file can be seen)
A search on the Epstein files for "Trump nipples" nothing comes up. But it's quite clear there's a document with "Trump" and "nipples" in the Epstein files.

So, essentially why would Trump not take on Vance's advice? Why would Trump call up people to try and get the story taken down? Why would Trump fight so hard against the Epstein files?

Actions speak louder than words.

And the actions of the MAGA who respond will basically be "Trump did nothing". But Trump did a lot, he fought against releasing a file that we cannot see even though Congress told him to release this file. That's breaking the law. Why would he break the law?

Trump Hit By Explosive Claim of 'Secret Tapes' as Epstein Victim Alleges Damaging Teenager Footage Exists

A new claim from an Epstein victim alleges the existence of secret tapes involving Donald Trump, potentially forcing his resignation. The unverified allegations have reignited debate over withheld Epstein evidence.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

Dunno how it will all go down. But I sure love those mammary glands!

 

[struth]

Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout

The president’s top advisers gathered in a series of Situation Room meetings as they struggled to contain a scandal engulfing Donald Trump himself.

www.nytimes.com

The White House had meeting about the Epstein files. All the big dogs were there, except Trump.

"“This is a huge problem,” [Vance} told the group."

"Vance told the group he believed all the files should be released as soon as possible."

"If the administration got out ahead of this and released everything voluntarily — including whatever material existed about the president — it would at least get credit for transparency. "

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

"Even the unsubstantiated allegations and anecdotes about Trump should go out, Vance argued. They were going to surface regardless, and if the administration published them first, it would demonstrate good faith and take the oxygen out of the conspiracy theories. His arguments fell on skeptical ears,"

"
Warrington, the White House counsel, responded by laying out the available choices, without advocating any of them. Maxwell could be given a pardon, he said, or she could have her sentence reduced.

At that, several around the table spoke up to register their strong disapproval.

“Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge P.R. problem,” Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of a pardon, the Epstein accusers would be fanning out on TV, telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds."

"Just then, The Wall Street Journal article they had been trying to kill was published online."

"detailed how Trump, and many others, had created birthday cards and letters to be assembled by Maxwell into a special birthday book for Epstein in 2003. "

"In the days before publication, Trump, in the effort to quash the story, had called News Corp.’s chief executive, Robert Thomson; News Corp.’s owner, Rupert Murdoch; and The Journal’s editor in chief, Emma Tucker. Practically shouting, the president told Tucker, who is British, that she must “hate America.” He told her he would file a lawsuit."

Why would Trump want the story quashed if it wasn't true?

Here's the file

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This came up:

"

EFTA02795303.pdf​

Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her "pert nipples"....Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together she showed me her nipples."

"Page not found"

Why is this page not found? This is definitely something that should have been released.

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This file has "Trump" and "nipples" in it. (not together Trump was just introduced to a 14 year old girl who was being touched by GM and JE). But does not show up on a search of "Trump nipples" either.


The facts here are: Vance suggested releasing files that had allegations against Trump.
The person who made the allegations is Sarah Ransome who had claimed she had sex videos of Trump, but then later on said she didn't have any.
People around Trump who are not Vance suggested that Trump would not be happy for such a file to be released.
The file was not released before the Epstein files were released and is not available now (the file cannot be accessed, but the first part of the file can be seen)
A search on the Epstein files for "Trump nipples" nothing comes up. But it's quite clear there's a document with "Trump" and "nipples" in the Epstein files.

So, essentially why would Trump not take on Vance's advice? Why would Trump call up people to try and get the story taken down? Why would Trump fight so hard against the Epstein files?

Actions speak louder than words.

And the actions of the MAGA who respond will basically be "Trump did nothing". But Trump did a lot, he fought against releasing a file that we cannot see even though Congress told him to release this file. That's breaking the law. Why would he break the law?

Trump Hit By Explosive Claim of 'Secret Tapes' as Epstein Victim Alleges Damaging Teenager Footage Exists

A new claim from an Epstein victim alleges the existence of secret tapes involving Donald Trump, potentially forcing his resignation. The unverified allegations have reignited debate over withheld Epstein evidence.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

Sounds like they followed Vance’s advice

 

[struth]

Dude, you are reduced to google searching "Trump nipples," so it is past time for you to seek help.

How do you have all those details and exact quotes from a white house meeting? did someone send you a video?

frigidweirdo and other dembots have to do something besides actually reading the files

 

[Doc7505]

Did you see the facts? No? Can't read that far down a post?

And it hasn't been "debunked", it's been "ridiculed" because if you ended up with Epstein, you're a whore or something, so you're clearly not speaking the truth, according to the BIGGEST ******* LIAR EVER TO BE PRESIDENT.

You trust one liar, but then the other one has been "debunked".

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Funny isn't it, Why is it that Democrats accept Clinton and Gates testimonies as fact about his relationship with Epstein, yet howl and freak out about supposed Trump involvement?
Is it because Democrats view Bill Clinton and Bill Gates' testimonies as credible because both have publicly denied any wrongdoing and expressed regret over their associations with Epstein> The differing levels of public perception and evidence surrounding their relationships with Epstein contribute to this disparity.

 

[Bad Bob]

Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout

The president’s top advisers gathered in a series of Situation Room meetings as they struggled to contain a scandal engulfing Donald Trump himself.

www.nytimes.com

The White House had meeting about the Epstein files. All the big dogs were there, except Trump.

"“This is a huge problem,” [Vance} told the group."

"Vance told the group he believed all the files should be released as soon as possible."

"If the administration got out ahead of this and released everything voluntarily — including whatever material existed about the president — it would at least get credit for transparency. "

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

"Even the unsubstantiated allegations and anecdotes about Trump should go out, Vance argued. They were going to surface regardless, and if the administration published them first, it would demonstrate good faith and take the oxygen out of the conspiracy theories. His arguments fell on skeptical ears,"

"
Warrington, the White House counsel, responded by laying out the available choices, without advocating any of them. Maxwell could be given a pardon, he said, or she could have her sentence reduced.

At that, several around the table spoke up to register their strong disapproval.

“Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge P.R. problem,” Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of a pardon, the Epstein accusers would be fanning out on TV, telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds."

"Just then, The Wall Street Journal article they had been trying to kill was published online."

"detailed how Trump, and many others, had created birthday cards and letters to be assembled by Maxwell into a special birthday book for Epstein in 2003. "

"In the days before publication, Trump, in the effort to quash the story, had called News Corp.’s chief executive, Robert Thomson; News Corp.’s owner, Rupert Murdoch; and The Journal’s editor in chief, Emma Tucker. Practically shouting, the president told Tucker, who is British, that she must “hate America.” He told her he would file a lawsuit."

Why would Trump want the story quashed if it wasn't true?

Here's the file

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This came up:

"

EFTA02795303.pdf​

Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her "pert nipples"....Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together she showed me her nipples."

"Page not found"

Why is this page not found? This is definitely something that should have been released.

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This file has "Trump" and "nipples" in it. (not together Trump was just introduced to a 14 year old girl who was being touched by GM and JE). But does not show up on a search of "Trump nipples" either.


The facts here are: Vance suggested releasing files that had allegations against Trump.
The person who made the allegations is Sarah Ransome who had claimed she had sex videos of Trump, but then later on said she didn't have any.
People around Trump who are not Vance suggested that Trump would not be happy for such a file to be released.
The file was not released before the Epstein files were released and is not available now (the file cannot be accessed, but the first part of the file can be seen)
A search on the Epstein files for "Trump nipples" nothing comes up. But it's quite clear there's a document with "Trump" and "nipples" in the Epstein files.

So, essentially why would Trump not take on Vance's advice? Why would Trump call up people to try and get the story taken down? Why would Trump fight so hard against the Epstein files?

Actions speak louder than words.

And the actions of the MAGA who respond will basically be "Trump did nothing". But Trump did a lot, he fought against releasing a file that we cannot see even though Congress told him to release this file. That's breaking the law. Why would he break the law?

Trump Hit By Explosive Claim of 'Secret Tapes' as Epstein Victim Alleges Damaging Teenager Footage Exists

A new claim from an Epstein victim alleges the existence of secret tapes involving Donald Trump, potentially forcing his resignation. The unverified allegations have reignited debate over withheld Epstein evidence.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

Jimmy Kimmel had fun with it.

Jimmy Kimmel Left Stunned by Donald Trump’s ‘Nipple Fetish’ Allegations - AOL

Jimmy Kimmel highlighted a report that accuses Donald Trump of having a “nipple fetish” in his latest monologue. The late-night talk show host mocked the president and his inner circle for their handling of the Epstein files. He then turned his attention towards Trump’s alleged kink. Jimmy...

www.aol.com

Jimmy Kimmel highlighted a report that accuses Donald Trump of having a "nipple fetish" in his latest monologue. The late-night talk show host mocked the president and his inner circle for their handling of the Epstein files. He then turned his attention towards Trump's alleged kink.

On the June 10 episode of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, the titular host fired several shots at Trump about the recent revelations in the Jeffrey Epstein controversy.

Citing a report regarding the reaction of Donald Trump's administration to the Epstein documents, Jimmy Kimmel said that "they had a panic summit in the situation room to try to figure out how to handle the fallout from the files."

He continued, "Now, the Situation Room, historically, is used for wars and military strikes. This time, they used it to try to defuse a naughty birthday card their boss made for a pedophile friend of his."

Jimmy Kimmel also shed light on a reported meeting that took place in the absence of Trump to discuss another matter. "His inner circle was all there to have what they described as a surreal meeting detailing allegations that Trump had an aggressive nipple fetish," Kimmel exclaimed. "At one point, the vice president, JD Vance, said he thought the president would be OK with releasing the nipple-related documents, arguing that he had been accused of worse."

 

[frigidweirdo]

The article clearly said the accuser had already lied about having a “sex tape” of Trump.

Get lost, idiot.

So, if you lie once, you're a liar forever? Then why do you support Trump, you ******* moron?

Everyone lies.

And what I'm looking at is Trump's reaction. But you're so ******* stupid you couldn't get that far down the post.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Dude, you are reduced to google searching "Trump nipples," so it is past time for you to seek help.

How do you have all those details and exact quotes from a white house meeting? did someone send you a video?

Oh, we need the exact quotes now? From people who fail to quote anything ever, but they demand others prove everything to 100% certainty.

******* typical MAGA "Moron Are Going Again"

 

[Clipper]

Yet another claim by a debunked liar.

But the left doesn’t care. If someone makes up a lie about Trump, it must be true.

When Trump ran his big mouth during the campaign about releasing the files you MAGA dupes were so excited you practically jumped thru your own assholes.

Now that he's ordering DOJ to not comply with the law? Not so much.

 

[frigidweirdo]

frigidweirdo and other dembots have to do something besides actually reading the files

Yeah, like coming on here and trying to pass off heinous crimes and their cult president defending those who do it? Oh, wait, that's you.

 

[frigidweirdo]

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Funny isn't it, Why is it that Democrats accept Clinton and Gates testimonies as fact about his relationship with Epstein, yet howl and freak out about supposed Trump involvement?
Is it because Democrats view Bill Clinton and Bill Gates' testimonies as credible because both have publicly denied any wrongdoing and expressed regret over their associations with Epstein> The differing levels of public perception and evidence surrounding their relationships with Epstein contribute to this disparity.

Probably because Trump is the president and Trump is the one who is protecting all these people.

If Clinton and Gates are guilty of anything, they should be in front of a judge. But they're not, because TRUMP is protecting all the Epstein people, including Maxwell who they considered giving a pardon to, instead put her in a comfortable prison.

 

[Clipper]

Yeah, like coming on here and trying to pass off heinous crimes and their cult president defending those who do it? Oh, wait, that's you.

If their MAGA god was caught on video molesting a kid, I swear the MAGA hatter's would blame the kid saying he/she was a "crisis actor".