Trump "would not, in fact, be OK with it" "it" being Vance said "the president would be OK with releasing the nipple-related documents": Epstein files

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yet another claim by a debunked liar.

But the left doesn’t care. If someone makes up a lie about Trump, it must be true.

Read this. It's in the OP you didnt read, before you responded reflexively, per your programming.

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

So, what do you think that reason is?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

And this is what we will eventually figure out, probably after the fat orange rapist drops dead.

 

[Rawley]

Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout

The president’s top advisers gathered in a series of Situation Room meetings as they struggled to contain a scandal engulfing Donald Trump himself.

www.nytimes.com

The White House had meeting about the Epstein files. All the big dogs were there, except Trump.

"“This is a huge problem,” [Vance} told the group."

"Vance told the group he believed all the files should be released as soon as possible."

"If the administration got out ahead of this and released everything voluntarily — including whatever material existed about the president — it would at least get credit for transparency. "

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

"Even the unsubstantiated allegations and anecdotes about Trump should go out, Vance argued. They were going to surface regardless, and if the administration published them first, it would demonstrate good faith and take the oxygen out of the conspiracy theories. His arguments fell on skeptical ears,"

"
Warrington, the White House counsel, responded by laying out the available choices, without advocating any of them. Maxwell could be given a pardon, he said, or she could have her sentence reduced.

At that, several around the table spoke up to register their strong disapproval.

“Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge P.R. problem,” Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of a pardon, the Epstein accusers would be fanning out on TV, telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds."

"Just then, The Wall Street Journal article they had been trying to kill was published online."

"detailed how Trump, and many others, had created birthday cards and letters to be assembled by Maxwell into a special birthday book for Epstein in 2003. "

"In the days before publication, Trump, in the effort to quash the story, had called News Corp.’s chief executive, Robert Thomson; News Corp.’s owner, Rupert Murdoch; and The Journal’s editor in chief, Emma Tucker. Practically shouting, the president told Tucker, who is British, that she must “hate America.” He told her he would file a lawsuit."

Why would Trump want the story quashed if it wasn't true?

Here's the file

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This came up:

"

EFTA02795303.pdf​

Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her "pert nipples"....Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together she showed me her nipples."

"Page not found"

Why is this page not found? This is definitely something that should have been released.

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

This file has "Trump" and "nipples" in it. (not together Trump was just introduced to a 14 year old girl who was being touched by GM and JE). But does not show up on a search of "Trump nipples" either.


The facts here are: Vance suggested releasing files that had allegations against Trump.
The person who made the allegations is Sarah Ransome who had claimed she had sex videos of Trump, but then later on said she didn't have any.
People around Trump who are not Vance suggested that Trump would not be happy for such a file to be released.
The file was not released before the Epstein files were released and is not available now (the file cannot be accessed, but the first part of the file can be seen)
A search on the Epstein files for "Trump nipples" nothing comes up. But it's quite clear there's a document with "Trump" and "nipples" in the Epstein files.

So, essentially why would Trump not take on Vance's advice? Why would Trump call up people to try and get the story taken down? Why would Trump fight so hard against the Epstein files?

Actions speak louder than words.

And the actions of the MAGA who respond will basically be "Trump did nothing". But Trump did a lot, he fought against releasing a file that we cannot see even though Congress told him to release this file. That's breaking the law. Why would he break the law?

Trump Hit By Explosive Claim of 'Secret Tapes' as Epstein Victim Alleges Damaging Teenager Footage Exists

A new claim from an Epstein victim alleges the existence of secret tapes involving Donald Trump, potentially forcing his resignation. The unverified allegations have reignited debate over withheld Epstein evidence.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

Does this nonsense get you hard?

 

[frigidweirdo]

If their MAGA god was caught on video molesting a kid, I swear the MAGA hatter's would blame the kid saying he/she was a "crisis actor".

Yeah, every time, without fail, you start a thread, and they've been given an excuse for why this isn't as bad as it looks. And it's a daily event. They're constantly having to defend someone who is messing everything up, and then boasting about it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Read this. It's in the OP you didnt read, before you responded reflexively, per your programming.





So, what do you think that reason is?

Why didn't Trump follow Vance's suggestion?

Because Trump was diddling underaged women with Epstein.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why didn't Trump follow Vance's suggestion?

Because Trump was diddling underaged women with Epstein.

Maybe. Ask me two years ago, and I would have said 80/20 no.

Then the fat rapist put on his embarrassing, guilty display for the last year. Now I am not so sure.

 

[Lockback]

Does this nonsense get you hard?

You just know this is a Democrat Masturbation Thread

 

[Clipper]

Maybe. Ask me two years ago, and I would have said 80/20 no.

Then the fat rapist put on his embarrassing, guilty display for the last year. Now I am not so sure.

Well, they're all willing to break the law in not releasing the remainder of those files. Vance, Wiles & the rest of Trump's crew actually met in the Situation Room, probably the most secure room in the W.H. to discuss that fiasco, but Trump did nothing wrong?

The shit that comes out that building must make our enemies abroad jump with joy.

 

[Lockback]

You just know this is a Democrat Masturbation Thread

Yep.
I was right.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Maybe. Ask me two years ago, and I would have said 80/20 no.

Then the fat rapist put on his embarrassing, guilty display for the last year. Now I am not so sure.

Me neither. Actions speak louder than words and his actions are shouting "GUILTY AS ****"

 

[Clipper]

You just know this is a Democrat Masturbation Thread

You love the files being hidden right, MAGA, dupe?

You jizzed yourself when you found out. You know you did.

 

[Bad Bob]

If their MAGA god was caught on video molesting a kid, I swear the MAGA hatter's would blame the kid saying he/she was a "crisis actor".

MAGAts will do or say anything to protect their Orange Jesus.

The fact his WH has crisis meetings in the Situation Room over Trump's Epstein connections indicates they know he's guilty. It follows the maxim "Where there's smoke, there's fire".

I expect there will be both more crisis meetings and more revelations about past meetings.

 

[Seymour Flops]

If Clinton and Gates are guilty of anything, they should be in front of a judge.

For what, though?

Suppose both Clinton and Gates factually had sex with underage girls at Epstein's Island. Suppose a prosecutor somehow knows this though some form of divine revelation.

You need evidence to take someone before a judge or a grand jury. This "an anonymous girl's lawyer told a reporter that her best friend saw Ferris flick a nipple at 31 Flavors!" won't fly in court. It would make a good clickbait: FERRIS FLICKED NIPPLE, but who would waste a court's time with that?

Probably because Trump is the president and Trump is the one who is protecting all these people.

What is Trump protecting them from that the Autopen administration did not protect them from?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

MAGAts will do or say anything to protect their Orange Jesus.

The fact his WH has crisis meetings in the Situation Room over Trump's Epstein connections indicates they know he's guilty. It follows the maxim "Where there's smoke, there's fire".

I expect there will be both more crisis meetings and more revelations about past meetings.

It's not so much that they know he is guilty. It"s that they are all angling for a piece of the MAGAt pie, after the fat rapist exits stage left.

There wont be any pie, if too many people come to believe Trump is a child rapist. True or not.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You just know this is a Democrat Masturbation Thread

The "we can't talk about this topic, so let's try and discredit them with something that has nothing to do with the topic" reply.

Happens about a million times per thread about anything you don't like. Childish.

 

[frigidweirdo]

For what, though?

Suppose both Clinton and Gates factually had sex with underage girls at Epstein's Island. Suppose a prosecutor somehow knows this though some form of divine revelation.

You need evidence to take someone before a judge or a grand jury. This "an anonymous girl's lawyer told a reporter that her best friend saw Ferris flick a nipple at 31 Flavors!" won't fly in court. It would make a good clickbait: FERRIS FLICKED NIPPLE, but who would waste a court's time with that?


What is Trump protecting them from that the Autopen administration did not protect them from?

Well, that is the problem and the rich know what they can get away with.

However there might just be evidence out there that is being hidden that might prove something.

 

[Bad Bob]

Well, that is the problem and the rich know what they can get away with.

However there might just be evidence out there that is being hidden that might prove something.

I'm certain that the main problem Trump has with the Epstein Files is evidence of tax evasion since he was probably laundering money for the sex trafficking ring through his casinos.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Well, that is the problem and the rich know what they can get away with.

However there might just be evidence out there that is being hidden that might prove something.

Sure, there might be. There might be a winning lotto ticket waiting for me at the nearest 7/11.

If there is such evidence, why was that evidence not brought out during the Autopen Administration?

 

[Bad Bob]

Sure, there might be. There might be a winning lotto ticket waiting for me at the nearest 7/11.

If there is such evidence, why was that evidence not brought out during the Autopen Administration?

IDK, but it's very curious why Trump continues to hide the files.

 

[Clipper]

MAGAts will do or say anything to protect their Orange Jesus.

The fact his WH has crisis meetings in the Situation Room over Trump's Epstein connections indicates they know he's guilty. It follows the maxim "Where there's smoke, there's fire".

I expect there will be both more crisis meetings and more revelations about past meetings.

Apparently, Wiles may be leaving after the mid-terms. For the good of the country she should get a one-way ticket to Florida- like yesterday.

She's knee deep in the shit protecting her boss. The Country is being run by some of the worse human beings who ever lived.