Trump "would not, in fact, be OK with it" "it" being Vance said "the president would be OK with releasing the nipple-related documents": Epstein files

Apparently, Wiles may be leaving after the mid-terms. For the good of the country she should get a one-way ticket to Florida- like yesterday.

She's knee deep in the shit protecting her boss. The Country is being run by some of the worse human beings who ever lived.
She is knee deep but it appears she's getting tired of it.
 
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Funny isn't it, Why is it that Democrats accept Clinton and Gates testimonies as fact about his relationship with Epstein, yet howl and freak out about supposed Trump involvement?
Is it because Democrats view Bill Clinton and Bill Gates' testimonies as credible because both have publicly denied any wrongdoing and expressed regret over their associations with Epstein> The differing levels of public perception and evidence surrounding their relationships with Epstein contribute to this disparity.
Why does Trump have a problem with releasing the files?
 
1781299794775.webp
 



The White House had meeting about the Epstein files. All the big dogs were there, except Trump.

"“This is a huge problem,” [Vance} told the group."

"Vance told the group he believed all the files should be released as soon as possible."

"If the administration got out ahead of this and released everything voluntarily — including whatever material existed about the president — it would at least get credit for transparency. "

You have to ask why Trump didn't follow Vance's suggestion. There must be a reason for why he didn't.

"Even the unsubstantiated allegations and anecdotes about Trump should go out, Vance argued. They were going to surface regardless, and if the administration published them first, it would demonstrate good faith and take the oxygen out of the conspiracy theories. His arguments fell on skeptical ears,"

"
Warrington, the White House counsel, responded by laying out the available choices, without advocating any of them. Maxwell could be given a pardon, he said, or she could have her sentence reduced.

At that, several around the table spoke up to register their strong disapproval.

“Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge P.R. problem,” Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of a pardon, the Epstein accusers would be fanning out on TV, telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds."

"Just then, The Wall Street Journal article they had been trying to kill was published online."

"detailed how Trump, and many others, had created birthday cards and letters to be assembled by Maxwell into a special birthday book for Epstein in 2003. "

"In the days before publication, Trump, in the effort to quash the story, had called News Corp.’s chief executive, Robert Thomson; News Corp.’s owner, Rupert Murdoch; and The Journal’s editor in chief, Emma Tucker. Practically shouting, the president told Tucker, who is British, that she must “hate America.” He told her he would file a lawsuit."

Why would Trump want the story quashed if it wasn't true?

Here's the file


This came up:

"

EFTA02795303.pdf

Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her "pert nipples"....Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together she showed me her nipples."

"Page not found"

Why is this page not found? This is definitely something that should have been released.


This file has "Trump" and "nipples" in it. (not together Trump was just introduced to a 14 year old girl who was being touched by GM and JE). But does not show up on a search of "Trump nipples" either.


The facts here are: Vance suggested releasing files that had allegations against Trump.
The person who made the allegations is Sarah Ransome who had claimed she had sex videos of Trump, but then later on said she didn't have any.
People around Trump who are not Vance suggested that Trump would not be happy for such a file to be released.
The file was not released before the Epstein files were released and is not available now (the file cannot be accessed, but the first part of the file can be seen)
A search on the Epstein files for "Trump nipples" nothing comes up. But it's quite clear there's a document with "Trump" and "nipples" in the Epstein files.

So, essentially why would Trump not take on Vance's advice? Why would Trump call up people to try and get the story taken down? Why would Trump fight so hard against the Epstein files?

Actions speak louder than words.

And the actions of the MAGA who respond will basically be "Trump did nothing". But Trump did a lot, he fought against releasing a file that we cannot see even though Congress told him to release this file. That's breaking the law. Why would he break the law?





So what? Ya still got nothing. Besides, CNN is the essence of fake news.
 
Remember when the fat orange rapist claimed he threw Epstein out of his club because Epstein "harrassed the daughter of a member?"

Then remember how, later, he forgot what lie he had originally told and said it was because Epstein "stole" his employee?

Good times.
Then the Epstein Files showed the orange pedo having Thanksgiving dinner with Epstein in 2016.
 
Then the Epstein Files showed the orange pedo having Thanksgiving dinner with Epstein in 2016.
Strange how Trump remembered the name of the "stolen employee", which was a minor working part time in the spa. Ya know, since he cant remember things he said yesterday.

Strange, indeed.
 
Strange how Trump heard Epstein was being investigated, then sprinted to the police to say, 'good job, we all knew what HE was doing.'

Ya know, like all innocent people who totally are not coconspirators trying to deflect attention from themselves do.

🤣
 
The article clearly said the accuser had already lied about having a “sex tape” of Trump.

Get lost, idiot.
The article also points out at least one obvious fact:

Trump Hit By Explosive Claim of 'Secret Tapes' as Epstein Victim Alleges Damaging Teenager Footage Exists

"Missing Evidence​

"Reports suggest that millions of documents, along with large volumes of video data, have yet to be made public. This includes claims of up to 40 terabytes of footage that could potentially contain critical evidence.

"Legal experts and commentators have questioned why such material remains undisclosed, especially given the scale of the investigation.

"Some argue that national security concerns or the involvement of high-profile individuals may be contributing factors.

"Others believe the lack of transparency is eroding public trust."
 
The article also points out at least one obvious fact:

Trump Hit By Explosive Claim of 'Secret Tapes' as Epstein Victim Alleges Damaging Teenager Footage Exists

"Missing Evidence​

"Reports suggest that millions of documents, along with large volumes of video data, have yet to be made public. This includes claims of up to 40 terabytes of footage that could potentially contain critical evidence.

"Legal experts and commentators have questioned why such material remains undisclosed, especially given the scale of the investigation.

"Some argue that national security concerns or the involvement of high-profile individuals may be contributing factors.

"Others believe the lack of transparency is eroding public trust."
Of course!

There’s no evidence of anything, therefore that is evidence they are covering something up!
 
Of course!

There’s no evidence of anything, therefore that is evidence they are covering something up!
No, the fact that they are illegally refusing to release the materials is evidence they are covering something up.

And if we were talking about anyone but the fat orange rapist, you would agree immediately.
 
Of course!

There’s no evidence of anything, therefore that is evidence they are covering something up!
There's no public evidence of Trump raping teenagers; maybe that's why millions of documents and 40 terabytes of video have not been publicly revealed?

AI Overview:

"Evidence is factual information, objects, or testimony used to support a claim, establish a truth, or confirm a hypothesis.

"It serves as the foundation for decision-making across various disciplines, ranging from scientific research to judicial proceedings. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]"

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia
 
15th post
"Reports suggest
Do you really take that seriously?

Do you think anyone not already Trump deranged is going to say "Reports suggest?! Wow, I had no idea that there was that kind of evidence! Let's get rid of Trump, and damn the border!"
 
Do you really take that seriously?

Do you think anyone not already Trump deranged is going to say "Reports suggest?! Wow, I had no idea that there was that kind of evidence! Let's get rid of Trump, and damn the border!"
I think we should release all of the millions of unreleased pages and terabytes of video currently being withheld.

If Trump (and Clinton) die like Epstein, is that a good thing?
 
Change the law then.
Which law requires change?

GoogleAI Overview: "Do Ro Khanna and Tom Massie believe all evidence in the Epstein files that can legally be released actually has been made public?"

No, both Representative Ro Khanna and Representative Tom Massie firmly believe that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is violating the law by withholding and over-redacting critical information from the public

"As the primary authors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they have publicly accused the DOJ of stonewalling, hiding documents, and actively defying the statutory disclosure mandates."
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom