The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

LIAR ability troll comes on the scene now with his troll buddydaw.

thank god for these new posters that have come on recently.can have an intelligent conversation for once now finally.
 
Last edited:
LIAR ability troll comes on the scene now with his troll buddydaw.

thank god for these new posters that have come on recently.can have an intelligent conversation for once now finally.
is it possible for you to write a coherent sentence?
how many tries did it take you to spell intelligent?.....with the help of spell check?
 
err have you already forgotten that thread you made a long time ago that said it was ludicrous and absurd for anybody to think otherwise that oswald Killed Kennedy?:lol: are you going to admit you made that thread or are you going to force me to dig that up and prove it?:lol: btw,did you read that post of mine post # 993 on page 67 that last long post of mine and watch those videos on that page as well that exonerates oswald and proves it was an inside job?

I dont care what I posted a long time ago.

Re-watchinging "JFK" and considering other eveidence - I changed my mind.

Thats what i was saying,better late several decades later to wake up,than never.the first time you watched it,you were obviously half asleep and not paying attention to it.I know many people that have done that.when you pay attention to it,the evidence is overwhelming it was an inside job and oswald had nothing to do with it.Stone exhaustively researched the case before he made the film.a lot of people are ignorant and think that some of the stuff he did was just made up and done for dramatic purposes but thats totally false.you should watch it three or four more times,you will pick up things you missed the previous time around as well..

All the dialouge that took place in that movie is based off interviews given to stone of those actual people that those actors portayed in the movie.matter of fact,there was a guy that lived in dallas who collected thousands of documents from research over the years whom I got to meet and whom Stone used his sources from as well and when someone in the audience asked him how accurate is the movie,he replied saying -About 95%.
Pretty damn accurate I would say.

So, what exactly do YOU believe happened? You have posted contradicting statements about Oswalds involvement. You obviously believe the driver fired the fatal shot. We've discussed THAT at length. If Stone "exhaustively researched" the case, then how did he miss the driver shooting?
You seem to think everybody was involved EXCEPT Oswald.
JFK is a great movie, it is no where near 95% accurate, but it is a great movie.
Here is a link to some things to consider:
JFK -- The Assassination Movie
 
LIAR ability troll comes on the scene now with his troll buddydaw.

thank god for these new posters that have come on recently.can have an intelligent conversation for once now finally.
is it possible for you to write a coherent sentence?
how many tries did it take you to spell intelligent?.....with the help of spell check?

It is NOt possible for 9/11 Rimjob to post intelligently or literately. He is nothing but a joke.

The stupid and uninteresting Oliver Stone movie, JFK, fascinated his little pinhead.

He bases his "opinions" on such fantasy.

And no. He can't figure out how to make Spell Check work.
 
well was able to have an intelligent conversation with someone today for a while anyways till the tards surfaced again.

the tards dont even know what the term-this person is on your ignore list means,thats why they talk to themselves.you all need help talking to yourselfs like you do.:lol:seriously.Geez when someone puts me on ignore,I dont continue quoting them talkingv to myself.That advertises how a poster is desperate for attention talking to themselves like that quoting that person who has them on ignore.cant get more pathetic that that.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Gyp,thanks for coming on,it was a refreshing change to see someone other than a tard come on here that I could talk to.
 
Last edited:
If 9/11 Rimjob saw a YouBoob video (or an Oliver Stone movie) that depicted him hanging President Kennedy in the limo, 9/11 Rimjob would turn himself in to the Dallas PD.

There is no statute of limitations on murder.
 
well was able to have an intelligent conversation with someone today for a while anyways till the tards surfaced again.

the tards dont even know what the term-this person is on your ignore list means,thats why they talk to themselves.you all need help talking to yourselfs like you do.:lol:seriously.Geez when someone puts me on ignore,I dont continue quoting them talkingv to myself.That advertises how a poster is desperate for attention talking to themselves like that quoting that person who has them on ignore.cant get more pathetic that that.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Gyp,thanks for coming on,it was a refreshing change to see someone other than a tard come on here that I could talk to.

So, are you going to whine, or are you going to discuss the topic at hand?
 
well was able to have an intelligent conversation with someone today for a while anyways till the tards surfaced again.

the tards dont even know what the term-this person is on your ignore list means,thats why they talk to themselves.you all need help talking to yourselfs like you do.:lol:seriously.Geez when someone puts me on ignore,I dont continue quoting them talkingv to myself.That advertises how a poster is desperate for attention talking to themselves like that quoting that person who has them on ignore.cant get more pathetic that that.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Gyp,thanks for coming on,it was a refreshing change to see someone other than a tard come on here that I could talk to.
is it just me or isn't odd for someone who claims "us" turds are on ignore to keep commenting on what he's suppose to be ignoring.:cuckoo:
 
well was able to have an intelligent conversation with someone today for a while anyways till the tards surfaced again.

the tards dont even know what the term-this person is on your ignore list means,thats why they talk to themselves.you all need help talking to yourselfs like you do.:lol:seriously.Geez when someone puts me on ignore,I dont continue quoting them talkingv to myself.That advertises how a poster is desperate for attention talking to themselves like that quoting that person who has them on ignore.cant get more pathetic that that.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Gyp,thanks for coming on,it was a refreshing change to see someone other than a tard come on here that I could talk to.

So, are you going to whine, or are you going to discuss the topic at hand?
:clap2:
 
well was able to have an intelligent conversation with someone today for a while anyways till the tards surfaced again.

the tards dont even know what the term-this person is on your ignore list means,thats why they talk to themselves.you all need help talking to yourselfs like you do.:lol:seriously.Geez when someone puts me on ignore,I dont continue quoting them talkingv to myself.That advertises how a poster is desperate for attention talking to themselves like that quoting that person who has them on ignore.cant get more pathetic that that.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Gyp,thanks for coming on,it was a refreshing change to see someone other than a tard come on here that I could talk to.
is it just me or isn't odd for someone who claims "us" turds are on ignore to keep commenting on what he's suppose to be ignoring.:cuckoo:

Yeah..............it doesn't make sense to come onto a "discussion" board to "ignore" people does it? Do us a favor and ignore us by being absent!
 
JFK assn muddied by braggarts who want to take credit.

See Nov issue of Playboy magazine. Long article on suppossed Mob-killing of JFK.

This guy named Files claims to have fired the fatal head-shot from the grassy-knoll.

Only one problem - the fatal head-shot has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by forensics to have come from behind the motorcade.

Please post your evidence of that statement, but please do not use something from the Warren commission.
 
JFK assn muddied by braggarts who want to take credit.

See Nov issue of Playboy magazine. Long article on suppossed Mob-killing of JFK.

This guy named Files claims to have fired the fatal head-shot from the grassy-knoll.

Only one problem - the fatal head-shot has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by forensics to have come from behind the motorcade.

Please post your evidence of that statement, but please do not use something from the Warren commission.

That you don't like the evidence is not a sufficient basis for your absurd little ground rule.

It is what it is.

It always is what it is.
 
JFK assn muddied by braggarts who want to take credit.

See Nov issue of Playboy magazine. Long article on suppossed Mob-killing of JFK.

This guy named Files claims to have fired the fatal head-shot from the grassy-knoll.

Only one problem - the fatal head-shot has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by forensics to have come from behind the motorcade.

Please post your evidence of that statement, but please do not use something from the Warren commission.

That you don't like the evidence is not a sufficient basis for your absurd little ground rule.

It is what it is.

It always is what it is.

What evidence? You don't have it and you can't post it here. Can you?

So that means that your words are like a fart in the wind.
 
Please post your evidence of that statement, but please do not use something from the Warren commission.

That you don't like the evidence is not a sufficient basis for your absurd little ground rule.

It is what it is.

It always is what it is.

What evidence? You don't have it and you can't post it here. Can you?

So that means that your words are like a fart in the wind.

I already have. That stench is entirely yours.

Again, you personally don't care for the WC Report.

So what?

What YOU care for remains entirely irrelevant.

It was Oswald's print on the Carcano.

That very weapon found IN the Book Depository was ballistically confirmed to have fired some of the shots that were recovered from the limo and from the Hospital where the mortally wounded President was taken.

Oswald's personal absence from the Book Depository (where he had been, in that perch just before or during the moments of the murder) AS THE SOLE employee missing from the location immediately AFTER the assassination is a given.

Oswald's own bizarre personal background is also a given.

Oswald was without ANY hint of a reasonable doubt involved. He may have even been the lone assassin.
 
That you don't like the evidence is not a sufficient basis for your absurd little ground rule.

It is what it is.

It always is what it is.

What evidence? You don't have it and you can't post it here. Can you?

So that means that your words are like a fart in the wind.

I already have. That stench is entirely yours.

Again, you personally don't care for the WC Report.

So what?

What YOU care for remains entirely irrelevant.

It was Oswald's print on the Carcano.

That very weapon found IN the Book Depository was ballistically confirmed to have fired some of the shots that were recovered from the limo and from the Hospital where the mortally wounded President was taken.

Oswald's personal absence from the Book Depository (where he had been, in that perch just before or during the moments of the murder) AS THE SOLE employee missing from the location immediately AFTER the assassination is a given.

Oswald's own bizarre personal background is also a given.

Oswald was without ANY hint of a reasonable doubt involved. He may have even been the lone assassin.

If you won't post evidence I will. However I don't you will read it if in fact you can read it.

Physical Evidence of Conspiracy

If it's ok to you for your Government to lie to you than that's on you. As for me, I will not have my employees lie to me.
 
What evidence? You don't have it and you can't post it here. Can you?

So that means that your words are like a fart in the wind.

I already have. That stench is entirely yours.

Again, you personally don't care for the WC Report.

So what?

What YOU care for remains entirely irrelevant.

It was Oswald's print on the Carcano.

That very weapon found IN the Book Depository was ballistically confirmed to have fired some of the shots that were recovered from the limo and from the Hospital where the mortally wounded President was taken.

Oswald's personal absence from the Book Depository (where he had been, in that perch just before or during the moments of the murder) AS THE SOLE employee missing from the location immediately AFTER the assassination is a given.

Oswald's own bizarre personal background is also a given.

Oswald was without ANY hint of a reasonable doubt involved. He may have even been the lone assassin.

If you won't post evidence I will. However I don't you will read it if in fact you can read it.

Physical Evidence of Conspiracy

If it's ok to you for your Government to lie to you than that's on you. As for me, I will not have my employees lie to me.
no linkage...
 
15th post
I already have. That stench is entirely yours.

Again, you personally don't care for the WC Report.

So what?

What YOU care for remains entirely irrelevant.

It was Oswald's print on the Carcano.

That very weapon found IN the Book Depository was ballistically confirmed to have fired some of the shots that were recovered from the limo and from the Hospital where the mortally wounded President was taken.

Oswald's personal absence from the Book Depository (where he had been, in that perch just before or during the moments of the murder) AS THE SOLE employee missing from the location immediately AFTER the assassination is a given.

Oswald's own bizarre personal background is also a given.

Oswald was without ANY hint of a reasonable doubt involved. He may have even been the lone assassin.

If you won't post evidence I will. However I don't you will read it if in fact you can read it.

Physical Evidence of Conspiracy

If it's ok to you for your Government to lie to you than that's on you. As for me, I will not have my employees lie to me.
no linkage...

Sorry about that. Let's try this.

Physical Evidence of Conspiracy
 
What evidence? You don't have it and you can't post it here. Can you?

So that means that your words are like a fart in the wind.

I already have. That stench is entirely yours.

Again, you personally don't care for the WC Report.

So what?

What YOU care for remains entirely irrelevant.

It was Oswald's print on the Carcano.

That very weapon found IN the Book Depository was ballistically confirmed to have fired some of the shots that were recovered from the limo and from the Hospital where the mortally wounded President was taken.

Oswald's personal absence from the Book Depository (where he had been, in that perch just before or during the moments of the murder) AS THE SOLE employee missing from the location immediately AFTER the assassination is a given.

Oswald's own bizarre personal background is also a given.

Oswald was without ANY hint of a reasonable doubt involved. He may have even been the lone assassin.

If you won't post evidence I will. However I don't you will read it if in fact you can read it.

Physical Evidence of Conspiracy

If it's ok to you for your Government to lie to you than that's on you. As for me, I will not have my employees lie to me.

I have read tons of idiot conspiracy whack-job bullshit.

I have also read and viewed much of the actual evidence, such as that reflected in the Warren Commission Report.

Oswald was absolutely involved.

Only utter idiots contend that there is "no evidence" of that. :cuckoo:
 
What evidence? You don't have it and you can't post it here. Can you?

So that means that your words are like a fart in the wind.

I already have. That stench is entirely yours.

Again, you personally don't care for the WC Report.

So what?

What YOU care for remains entirely irrelevant.

It was Oswald's print on the Carcano.

That very weapon found IN the Book Depository was ballistically confirmed to have fired some of the shots that were recovered from the limo and from the Hospital where the mortally wounded President was taken.

Oswald's personal absence from the Book Depository (where he had been, in that perch just before or during the moments of the murder) AS THE SOLE employee missing from the location immediately AFTER the assassination is a given.

Oswald's own bizarre personal background is also a given.

Oswald was without ANY hint of a reasonable doubt involved. He may have even been the lone assassin.

If you won't post evidence I will. However I don't you will read it if in fact you can read it.

Physical Evidence of Conspiracy

If it's ok to you for your Government to lie to you than that's on you. As for me, I will not have my employees lie to me.

Well, here is some counter-evidence:
LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S SOLE GUILT -- POINT-BY-POINT
Lee Harvey Oswald -- Lone Assassin or Patsy?

In addition, I've got a question for those that believe shots were fired from multiple locations:
Why would conspirators that are planning on framing a guy on the sixth floor of a building, of firing at the president from behind, place the "real" shooters anywhere but BEHIND the president? Why would their plan be to fire at him from the front and/or side and then have to do all the work of changing medical records, photos, films, and even the actual wound themselves? It defies logic to conduct a conspiracy in that manner.
 
Back
Top Bottom