The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. I think the death shot was shot from the front seat passengers fore head and hair.
2. The light just hit it in a certain way, and that produced a bullet, that didn't even have a powder flash.
3. Yup, that did it!


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It attributed the assasination to a French hit team.

Problem is - all the members of the team were either in jail or serving in the French military at the time.

Gerald Posner pointed this out in his Case Closed.

It was a CIA job.

yeah the trolls cant get around the fact that the CIA was involved in the fact that when the HSCA in the 70's during their investigation,when it was winding down,two CIA men came forwarrd and said-WE DID IT.WHERE DO YOU WANT TO GO WITH THIS INVESTIGATION? the HSCA on assassinations of course did not pursue this lead because anything that pointed towards government involvement,they ignored.

This was all written and talked about in a book written by a man who was a senator who served on that HSCA investigation.He resigned in disgust because of that since they made it clear they had no interest in finding out the truth.Their investigation was as much a joke as the warren commission was.He wrote a book that and talked about all of that in it.

Plus you have E Howard Hunt a covert CIA operaive that did covert wars for the CIA for Dick Nixon when he was vice president Under Eisenhower,who ran secret CIA wars in vietnam for him that even Eisenhower did not know about,he made a a death bed confession to his son in a taped recording that was played all over national radio networks.For his entire life,he denied that he was in dallas that day.

Him and Dick Nixon are the only men who could not remember where they were that day.Nixon was at a pepsi cola convention in dallas the morning of the assassination yet he lied and said he was in washington that morning. Hunt as well lied saying saying his entire life that he was not in dallas that day.well on his deathbed confession before he died,he is on tape telling his son that he WAS in dallas that day and he participated in the assassination and that it was a rogue element of the CIA that pulled off the assassination.

The CIA's fingerprints are all over this when you follow the money trail.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Sorry bout that,



1. In the *CWN* study, after looking at the nix film, I have come to the absolute conclusion that, the image where the driver appears to be turning and aiming a shinning weapon towards JFK, then JFK's head exlpodes is false, it is in the image ofcourse, but what you are actually seeing is, the reflection of the guys hair and fourhead who is sitting in the front seat passenger side of the limo.
2. The movement of the so-called gun image, is the front seat passenger rocking back and forward when the driver accelerates and tapped the breaks.
3. CASE CLOSED.
4. Lee Harvey Oswald did it by himself, and ofcourse I met Lee's brother once.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

sir james,the TROLL of texas. anymore fairy tales of the day to tell? yeah thats it,only read the warren commission,dont watch those videos I referred to earlier and read that long post of mine a few pages back that proves you are full of shit.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,



1. In the *CWN* study, after looking at the nix film, I have come to the absolute conclusion that, the image where the driver appears to be turning and aiming a shinning weapon towards JFK, then JFK's head exlpodes is false, it is in the image ofcourse, but what you are actually seeing is, the reflection of the guys hair and fourhead who is sitting in the front seat passenger side of the limo.
2. The movement of the so-called gun image, is the front seat passenger rocking back and forward when the driver accelerates and tapped the breaks.
3. CASE CLOSED.
4. Lee Harvey Oswald did it by himself, and ofcourse I met Lee's brother once.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

sir james,the TROLL of texas. anymore fairy tales of the day to tell? yeah thats it,only read the warren commission,dont watch those videos I referred to earlier and read that long post of mine a few pages back that proves you are full of shit.

1. SO you're saying that the shiny image that appears near the driver is in fact a pistol, that the driver reached up under the dash board and fired the, *kill shot*?
2. PLEASE SAY YOU"RE SAYING THAT!!!!



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[7forever]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,

sir james,the TROLL of texas. anymore fairy tales of the day to tell? yeah thats it,only read the warren commission,dont watch those videos I referred to earlier and read that long post of mine a few pages back that proves you are full of shit.

1. SO you're saying that the shiny image that appears near the driver is in fact a pistol, that the driver reached up under the dash board and fired the, *kill shot*?
2. PLEASE SAY YOU"RE SAYING THAT!!!!

SO you're saying that white fake blob that recoils and separates from his head is a real reflection? 2. PLEASE SAY YOU"RE SAYING THAT

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,



1. Yes I am absolutely saying that.
2. What is actually happening here is simple, its the suns reflective light bouncing off the fore head and top of the hair, of the front seat passenger,*THAT* is all we are seeing in this clip 7forever.
3. Please argue with me claiming its a gun.
4. You need your eyes checked.
5. I know you desperately want to see a gun there, but from my *Study*, which took me all of three minutes, I have unequivocally determined what all, *WE* are seeing is just a reflection of light coming over the visor, and bouncing off the hair and fore head of the front seat passenger.
6. You can also see that the front seat passenger looked around to the back seat area, just before the *kill shot* then was propelled forward due to the driver hitting the breaks, during the fatal shot, the mass of the front seat passengers body is easy to make out in the lower portion of this clip, just over where the bottom edge of the clip is, see how that dark mass moves around, and how the sun only hits his head at certain times, when he sits more up right.
7. I would think, that the sound of JFK's head exploding sounded like a loud bang, and the driver thought he had been in a car accident, so he hit the breaks, as a auto sensory reaction.
8. Thank me for figuring this out.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Liability]

To any rational mind, it is beyond question that we are seeing the sunlight gleam off of the passenger's hair.

As I have said before, however, he may not have known that his haircut was loaded.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

To any rational mind, it is beyond question that we are seeing the sunlight gleam off of the passenger's hair.

As I have said before, however, he may not have known that his haircut was loaded.

1. So you are saying you already made this same conclusion in this thread?
2. If so where?
3. I thought that I was the first to make this observation, in this thread???
4. At least thats what it seemed like when I joined in to this thread.
5. Kindly direct me to where it is you made such a claim earlier in this thread.
6. I did love the part in your post,

"He may not have known that his haircut was loaded."

7. But that too was borrowed from me, you are not plagiarizing my stuff are you?




Regards,
SirJameofTexas

 

[7forever]

Sorry bout that,



1. Yes I am absolutely saying that.
2. What is actually happening here is simple, its the suns reflective light bouncing off the fore head and top of the hair, of the front seat passenger,*THAT* is all we are seeing in this clip 7forever.
3. Please argue with me claiming its a gun.
4. You need your eyes checked.
5

Then show a reflection that looks like a gun at the moment a president's being shot. You can't because it never happened but in the altered Zfilm.

 

[7forever]

To any rational mind, it is beyond question that we are seeing the sunlight gleam off of the passenger's hair.

As I have said before, however, he may not have known that his haircut was loaded.

To any rational mind, it is beyond question that we are seeing 1963 video fakery by simply showing that Greer's left arm really does cross with the headshot.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,



1. Yes I am absolutely saying that.
2. What is actually happening here is simple, its the suns reflective light bouncing off the fore head and top of the hair, of the front seat passenger,*THAT* is all we are seeing in this clip 7forever.
3. Please argue with me claiming its a gun.
4. You need your eyes checked.
5

Then show a reflection that looks like a gun at the moment a president's being shot. You can't because it never happened but in the altered Zfilm.

1. So are you saying the hair is a gun or not???


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[7forever]

Sorry bout that,



5. I know you desperately want to see a gun there, but from my *Study*, which took me all of three minutes, I have unequivocally determined what all, *WE* are seeing is just a reflection of light coming over the visor, and bouncing off the hair and fore head of the front seat passenger.

There's nothing desperate about showing Greer shoot jfk. He shot him because three films show it very clearly. You are desperate and delusional. You have evidence of nothing and continue with your silly obsession by denying visual facts.

 

[7forever]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,



1. Yes I am absolutely saying that.
2. What is actually happening here is simple, its the suns reflective light bouncing off the fore head and top of the hair, of the front seat passenger,*THAT* is all we are seeing in this clip 7forever.
3. Please argue with me claiming its a gun.
4. You need your eyes checked.
5

Then show a reflection that looks like a gun at the moment a president's being shot. You can't because it never happened but in the altered Zfilm.

1. So are you saying the hair is a gun or not???


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

The fakery in Zapruder simply mirrors what Greer really did which was fire the shot over his right shoulder. The gun was not next to his face but near his right shoulder.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,

Then show a reflection that looks like a gun at the moment a president's being shot. You can't because it never happened but in the altered Zfilm.

1. So are you saying the hair is a gun or not???


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

The fakery in Zapruder simply mirrors what Greer really did which was fire the shot over his right shoulder. The gun was not next to his face but near his right shoulder.

1. So you are saying, the gun isn't the reflective looking thing, that appears to some to be a gun, but the actual guns was not in the clip, and was lower, down on his shoulder, which can't been seen?



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[7forever]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,



5

Then show a reflection that looks like a gun at the moment a president's being shot. You can't because it never happened but in the altered Zfilm.

1. So are you saying the hair is a gun or not???


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Until you can show a hair reflection besides jfk's recoiling and separating from the head its attached to, it's a proven fake. Get to work, *****.

 

[7forever]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,









1. So are you saying the hair is a gun or not???


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

The fakery in Zapruder simply mirrors what Greer really did which was fire the shot over his right shoulder. The gun was not next to his face but near his right shoulder.

1. So you are saying, the gun isn't the reflective looking thing, that appears to some to be a gun, but the actual guns was not in the clip, and was lower, down on his shoulder, which can't been seen?



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Greer passed the gun in Zapruder and that same bleached object is seen going to the floor in frame 319. The gun's in the film before and after the shot and fakery was created during the shot.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,

Then show a reflection that looks like a gun at the moment a president's being shot. You can't because it never happened but in the altered Zfilm.

1. So are you saying the hair is a gun or not???


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Until you can show a hair reflection besides jfk's recoiling and separating from the head its attached to, it's a proven fake. Get to work, *****.

1. Lets be clear, you are saying, "I believe that the shiny object towards the front seat that is near the drivers head, is in fact a gun".
2. Or this is what you believe, "I believe the gun isn't shown in the clip, its lower on the drivers shoulder, and is not shiny.
3. Just post this is your next post, a, 1. or a 2. I will then know what you are saying.
4. I know I have just shattered your reality, and this must be very hard on you, so just post 1. or 2.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Liability]

Morons like 7forNever have no proof of any forgery.

But that will never stop them from mindlessly and dishonestly (with intent) repeating their bullshit like a ******* broken record.

 

[7forever]

Okay. I read through a lot of the posts, but not all. If this is redundant I apologize in advance. I believe in conspiracy theories & government cover ups.
What I am not understanding here is this:

If the passenger beside the driver saw this, & he definitely would have, then he was in on it also?

If the Governor thought Greer pulled the trigger, then I assume his wife did too.
Why would they cover for him?

Why would Jackie keep her mouth shut all those years after, even on her deathbed, if she knew who really killed JFK?

Do none of you subscribe to theory that LBJ had the most to gain from the death of JFK?

I seriously want your opinions & answers. I wasn't born when JFK was murdered, but I have always been interested in the theories. I obviously have my own. The whole Kennedy curse has legs.

Jackie wasn't look at him, so she didn't see Greer shoot although she may have realized it but who knows. Connally saw Greer shoot jfk and took it to his grave. They didn't say anything because it was a massive cover-up. Just imagine the governor of TX going against the media and government in the 60's. A complete joke. Of course it was ridiculous and that's the very reason why millions of americans should know about it. So, they can laugh at how retarded government can really be when their arrogance allows such an epic blunder.

Connally said he saw the fatal shot and quickly corrected himself but his reaction when looking at Greer proves he slipped up. Watch him hit the floor in horror once he realized Greer shot Kennedy.

Obviously, at least the major wound that I took in the shoulder through the chest couldn't have been anything but the second shot. Obviously, it couldn't have been the third, because when the third shot was fired I was in a reclining position, and heard it, saw it and the effects of it, rather--I didn't see it, I saw the effects of it--so it obviously could not have been the third, and couldn't have been the first, in my judgment.

 

[7forever]

Morons like 7forNever have no proof of any forgery.

But that will never stop them from mindlessly and dishonestly (with intent) repeating their bullshit like a ******* broken record.

Morons like you have proof of nothing.

But that will never stop you from mindlessly and dishonestly (with nonsense) repeating your denials of fact like a broken record.