That's another lie from you. You're an idiot and compulsive liar.Carter was a "serial misinformer"
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's another lie from you. You're an idiot and compulsive liar.Carter was a "serial misinformer"
How did you come to that conclusion?Muhammed
The temperatures have been spiking in an upward trend the last few decades
Other than the fact that, assuming your figures are correct, the numbers above makes water vapor about 60-70X more ppm than CO2, not 10,000, you otherwise actually kinda make a pretty good point.CO2 is a greenhouse gas. So is water vapor. the concentration of CO2 is only 410 ppm. Water is around 20,000 to 30,000 ppm on the average. Or, around 10,000 times the concentration. What do scientists say about water vapor and cloud cover with regard to Climate Change? They tend to ignore it.
That too is also a pretty good point. Funny that the party of science always seems offended by anyone asking them any questions. But one should also realize that when CO2 was as high as you say it was long, long ago, it was not a climate very hospitable towards people nor would it be good for growing our food crops.Science, by definition, is inquiry. Always asking questions.
It's called climate change because there isn't uniform warming of the globe.There is no way to win. Haven't you noticed over the past decade that the use of the term "Global Warming" has faded from the lexicon?
It is now "Climate Change". That way their bullshit story is covered either way. Colder? Climate change, Hotter? Climate change, Wetter? Climate Change, Dryer? Climate change.
True. It would not be a good place for humans. We exist best in a narrow balance of elements, including CO2. What was good for the dinosaurs wouldn't be good for us. Genesis describes the creation of the perfect habitat for modern man, which necessitated the destruction of the previous ones.What you are failing to admit is that if we were to increase CO2 to that point, then water vapor would accelerate the heating process, and the whole planet would be perpetually covered in clouds.
We could not longer do astronomy.
Air travel would become much harder, as there would almost always be rain storms and fog.
The big swamps that created the oil beds would return, but they would not be pleasant.
Yep, AGW is dead as a meme for the left. It didn't pan out because their 'proof' was human contaminated data put into unreliable computer models. Besides, the major contributer to GHG is water vapor.There is no way to win. Haven't you noticed over the past decade that the use of the term "Global Warming" has faded from the lexicon?
It is now "Climate Change". That way their bullshit story is covered either way. Colder? Climate change, Hotter? Climate change, Wetter? Climate Change, Dryer? Climate change.
But do you think that man is the cause of it?It's called climate change because there isn't uniform warming of the globe.
It's such a scam...people keep falling for them.Yep, AGW is dead as a meme for the left. It didn't pan out because their 'proof' was human contaminated data put into unreliable computer models. Besides, the major contributer to GHG is water vapor.
Let's reduce GHG's, sequester carbon, reduce fossil fuel use, and see what happens.But do you think that man is the cause of it?
What does CO2 have to do with water vapor?What you are failing to admit is that if we were to increase CO2 to that point, then water vapor would accelerate the heating process, and the whole planet would be perpetually covered in clouds.
We could not longer do astronomy.
Air travel would become much harder, as there would almost always be rain storms and fog.
The big swamps that created the oil beds would return, but they would not be pleasant.
Your chart ends 7 years ago!The ice melt is a phase change, and when you have a phase change, you have increased heat but temperature stays the same.
But the oceans also are a huge heat sink, that can greatly slow temperature change.
And not, ice is not increasing at either pole.
Link?No the ozone layer is not "healed".
In some places in the southern hemisphere, they recommend covering up due to the solar radiation leakage.
Tell that to the Chinese and Indians.No one said it was a pollutant, but it is a green house gas and needs to be reduced.
So what is that level? You have no clue, do you?A level that doesn't cause Global warming surely. I'm surprised the question was asked.
As the atmosphere warms it holds more water vapor, which has the cascading effect of holding yet more heat, and... more water vapor. The result is the huge rainfall and flood events that are happening globally.What does CO2 have to do with water vapor?
As the atmosphere warms it holds more water vapor, which has the cascading effect of holding yet more heat, and... more water vapor. The result is the huge rainfall and flood events that are happening globally.
The earth is prophesied to get pretty hot in the last days. This may be the mechanism.So once it starts, it never ends? Hotter and hotter?
How long until we're Venus?