The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

[SSDD]

Acid rain existed long before anything and everything man-made. That proves that the left has been lying that man caused anything.

Here's another denier cultist who guzzled down too much of what the cult kept trickling down his willing throat, pickling his brain beyond any hope of redemption. "Derpderpderp! If it happened naturally before, humans can't have any effect on it! Forest fires were always natural before, so humans can't cause forest fires! Derp! Derpderp!".

We can't help these denier imbeciles. They've been trained to be cult imbeciles, they're proud of being cult imbeciles, and they despise anyone else who isn't a cult imbecile.

The sad thing is that their vote counts as much as a normal person's

Poor hairball...got any actual evidence that we are the cause of the change? Anything real? Anything at all?

 

[P@triot]

Look at you. You're actually telling everyone that humans can't cause forest fires.

Sweetie...acid rain existed thousands of years before the industrial revolution. CO2 levels were HIGHER than now thousands of years before the industrial revolution.

Listening to you babble about "forest fires" when that is not the topic is bizarre and it doesn't help your case at all. You're so mad that you've been proven wrong when you should be mad at the left-wing idiots who duped you and cashed in on it big time.

 

[ReinyDays]

How did we test the pH of rain water thousands of years ago? ... isn't the better argument against climate hysteria that a 2ºC increase in temperatures by year 2100 is trivial? ... even that requires a nearly three-fold increase in the greenhouse effect ... not sure we can burn fossil fuels fast enough to do that ...

 

[P@triot]

Even the IPCC is being forced to admit all of the fear-mongering was pure b.s.

But even though the world has already warmed by 1 °C, humanity has 10–30 more years than scientists previously thought in which to kick its carbon habit.

They are up to 30 years now. Eventually they will have to admit that we have 3,000 years.

Greta Thunberg says climate activism isn't just about the environment, demands we 'change everything'

 

[MaryL]

I voted for Trump. I am that fed up with liberals. But yes, Virginia Global climate change is real. Ask any Midwestern American farmer that is over 40, and it doesn't matter what its called. We know its happening.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How did we test the pH of rain water thousands of years ago? ... isn't the better argument against climate hysteria that a 2ºC increase in temperatures by year 2100 is trivial? ... even that requires a nearly three-fold increase in the greenhouse effect ... not sure we can burn fossil fuels fast enough to do that ...

Um, Shankun used jellyfish farts as a proxy

 

[ChemEngineer]

I can't imagine trying to perpetuate a lie after being proven so wrong, so many times...

That's how Democrats roll everywhere. Lie and double down on your lies.
Otherwise you have to admit that you were wrong. Evil doesn't do that.

I added your opening post link to my website:

Environmentalist Hypocrisy

 

[ChemEngineer]

Tell me, in your version of the greenhouse hypothesis, how does CO2 manage to negate all the other IR bands in which all the other so called greenhouse gasses radiate in? Or do they know that they are in the magical CO2 greenhouse effect world and simply don't radiate in order to not cause trouble for themselves?

It is not the radiation spectra of greenhouse gasses that capture energy but rather their absorption spectra.
Water vapor dominates, quantitatively and qualitatively.

Water vapor dominates the atmospheric greenhouse gasses at ~15,000 ppmv, versus a scant ~400 ppmv for carbon dioxide.

 

[ReinyDays]

Do you think water vapor and carbon dioxide absorb energy and hold it as higher temperature ... that violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics ... these species absorb radiation in parallel and rather quickly re-emit it radially ...

The graph is scaled as "% absorption" ... and not total energy ... that band between 15 and 20 µm is the area of peak radiation for the Earth ... thus more energy absorbed and re-emitted than the either of the two peak "% absorption" for water vapor ...

The 2ºC temperature rise in 100 years that the IPCC predicts would require CO2 concentrations up above 1,200 ppmv, perhaps way above that ... connecting 6 to 8 billion more people to the electric grid could do that ... but we'll need to hurry ... plants are ruining our chances at a warmer better prettier Earth ... hateful bastards ...

 

[SSDD]

I voted for Trump. I am that fed up with liberals. But yes, Virginia Global climate change is real. Ask any Midwestern American farmer that is over 40, and it doesn't matter what its called. We know its happening.

You have been shown that your short term anecdotal memory is incorrect before, but buy all means, lets do it again...Pick a region....since you said "any midwestern farmer" lets look at the midwest as a region.

Going back 40 years will put you at the end of 1979. Interesting that you pick 1979 because that year marks the turn from the coming period which began in the 1940's.

Since you mention midwest farmers, maybe you have heard of a period of time known as the dust bowl. The dust bowl covered a period that began in 1930 and continued through 1936.

Here is a chart beginning considerably before the 40 year mark you like to look at and tracks maximum temperatures across time...Note the temperatures during the dust bowl years in contrast to the present.

Here is one that charts the average number of days equal to or greater than 90 degrees across the US... Again...it is clear that if you go back further than your 40 years, you see an entirely different story. Relying on your memory to accurately describe what the climate was like for a given period is an inherently bad way to gauge what the present climate is like...first, most of us have not lived long enough to have enough information to even begin to make an accurate assessment of the present climate.

Since the 19th century, the peak temperatures have dropped about 20 degrees.This year, the peak temperature in the midwest didn't even make it to 99 degrees.

Here is a graph showing the 200 hottest days ever recorded in the midwest....again, notice how much information you miss by only looking back 40 years.

So there is yet more information to add to that which has already been given to you demonstrating that your anecdotal memory of what it was like in the good old days is terribly flawed. No doubt you will file it in the round file and wait until the next opportunity presents itself to talk how bad it is now compared to the "good ole days' a mere 40 years ago,

 

[SSDD]

Tell me, in your version of the greenhouse hypothesis, how does CO2 manage to negate all the other IR bands in which all the other so called greenhouse gasses radiate in? Or do they know that they are in the magical CO2 greenhouse effect world and simply don't radiate in order to not cause trouble for themselves?

It is not the radiation spectra of greenhouse gasses that capture energy but rather their absorption spectra.
Water vapor dominates, quantitatively and qualitatively.

View attachment 295446

Water vapor dominates the atmospheric greenhouse gasses at ~15,000 ppmv, versus a scant ~400 ppmv for carbon dioxide.

You know....the absorption spectra is only half the story...there is an emission spectra as well...CO2 absorbs and emits...it does't "trap" anything. This is evidenced by the lack of an upper tropospheric hot spot which would be the roof of your greenhouse effect...you have no roof, so you have no greenhouse.

 

[ChemEngineer]

I voted for Trump. I am that fed up with liberals. But yes, Virginia Global climate change is real. Ask any Midwestern American farmer that is over 40, and it doesn't matter what its called. We know its happening.

You have been shown that your short term anecdotal memory is incorrect before, but buy all means, lets do it again...Pick a region....since you said "any midwestern farmer" lets look at the midwest as a region.

Going back 40 years will put you at the end of 1979. Interesting that you pick 1979 because that year marks the turn from the coming period which began in the 1940's.

Since you mention midwest farmers, maybe you have heard of a period of time known as the dust bowl. The dust bowl covered a period that began in 1930 and continued through 1936.

Here is a chart beginning considerably before the 40 year mark you like to look at and tracks maximum temperatures across time...Note the temperatures during the dust bowl years in contrast to the present.

Here is one that charts the average number of days equal to or greater than 90 degrees across the US... Again...it is clear that if you go back further than your 40 years, you see an entirely different story. Relying on your memory to accurately describe what the climate was like for a given period is an inherently bad way to gauge what the present climate is like...first, most of us have not lived long enough to have enough information to even begin to make an accurate assessment of the present climate.

Since the 19th century, the peak temperatures have dropped about 20 degrees.This year, the peak temperature in the midwest didn't even make it to 99 degrees.

Here is a graph showing the 200 hottest days ever recorded in the midwest....again, notice how much information you miss by only looking back 40 years.

So there is yet more information to add to that which has already been given to you demonstrating that your anecdotal memory of what it was like in the good old days is terribly flawed. No doubt you will file it in the round file and wait until the next opportunity presents itself to talk how bad it is now compared to the "good ole days' a mere 40 years ago,

There you go presenting scientific facts and data instead of insanely screaming and calling the opposition names and telling them how intellectual, scientific and rational you are...….

Although my website, The Global Warming Fraud, is already overflowing with graphs, scientific papers, quotes and references, these four new ones above are so good I may well have to add them!

 

[ChemEngineer]

When the fraudulent Keeling Curve is adjusted for water vapor, THE dominant greenhouse gas, it is no longer the Scary Graph.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Humans add to atmospheric carbon dioxide to the extent of 1 ppmv every 22 years.
Scary. Atmospheric water vapor is roughly 15,000 ppmv. So add 1 to the red line above every 22 years and pay the power grabbers $1,000 annually for their wonderful plans to save you, and pay themselves.

 

[P@triot]

I voted for Trump. I am that fed up with liberals. But yes, Virginia Global climate change is real. Ask any Midwestern American farmer that is over 40, and it doesn't matter what its called. We know its happening.

Instead of posting in this thread, try reading in it. You can’t learn from speaking. This entire thread unequivocally proves that “Global Warming” is a scam.

 

[P@triot]

Once again, indisputable proof that “Global Warming” is a scam.

Ice returned to the Northwest Passage this summer, forcing cruise lines to change course

 

[P@triot]

Bwahahaha!!!

The students who claim to “care” about the environment refuse to allow Oxford to shut off their heat (which is provided by fossil fuels).

Students: We demand the school sell its stock in fossil fuels. Professor: I can't do that, but I'll turn off the gas heating for you.

 

[P@triot]

History will look back on the “Global Warming” alarmists and laugh their ass off at them...

Faulty Assumptions Lead to Fake News About Climate Change

 

[P@triot]

 

[P@triot]

It’s so good to see the American people defeat the sick Gaystapo...

Bank Reverses Decision, Picks Kids Over LGBT Activists