Global warming can’t be ignored, Montana’s top court says, upholding landmark climate case

[EMH]

Sorry, normal adults don't defer to uneducated slobs on complicated scientific topics.

What's truly funny is that you are never able to even debate the issue beyond


I parrot X and X is smarter than you....


but X cannot answer those questions either, so how smart is X???


LOL!!!

 

[TNHarley]

You don't know anything about the science.

I know enough to know you people are moonbats

 

[TNHarley]

In what we call reality, AGW Theory is the most welreserached and well evidenced theory in history.

We don't understand our planet. That's a damn fact. We can't even determine human origins. Now the new theory is out of Europe. Science doesn't settle, with your fake ass.
Junk models built off things we don't understand over things we don't understand. We can't even predict local weather without the meteorologist constantly wrong but we understand humans influence natural earth evolution?
Laughable.
Moonbat

 

[ding]

We don't understand our planet.

Really? Is that your final answer? There's a shit ton of empirical climate evidence.

 

[EMH]

The above post is 100% pure fudged fraud and should be ignored. There is no real data there, just fudge and "oxygen isotopes" from one hole in Antarctica that is supposed to "track temperature" except we have nothing to test that claim...

 

[EMH]

We don't understand our planet. That's a damn fact. We can't even determine human origins. Now the new theory is out of Europe. Science doesn't settle, with your fake ass.
Junk models built off things we don't understand over things we don't understand. We can't even predict local weather without the meteorologist constantly wrong but we understand humans influence natural earth evolution?
Laughable.
Moonbat

Actually, the truth of Earth climate change is quite simple...

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[ding]

The above post is 100% pure fudged fraud and should be ignored. There is no real data there, just fudge and "oxygen isotopes" from one hole in Antarctica that is supposed to "track temperature" except we have nothing to test that claim...

Leave it to a climate troll to deny the evidence of the geologic record.

Shove your tin foil hat up your ass.

 

[ding]

Actually, the truth of Earth climate change is quite simple...

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

Can't wait to see how this plays out.

 

[EMH]

Can't wait to see how this plays out.

especially since you cannot refute one word of it...

 

[ding]

especially since you cannot refute one word of it...

I'm really hoping he agrees with you.

 

[TNHarley]

Actually, the truth of Earth climate change is quite simple...

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

More theory about shit we don't understand

 

[EMH]

More theory about shit we don't understand

You cannot refute one word of it.

You may not understand it, but the past four Presidents all did. One even tried to have it prosecuted, but his AG, Jeff Sessions, was too busy sticking his nose up the ass of the two traitors in the WH before that one...

Google Search

 

[ding]

More theory about shit we don't understand

What is it that you don't understand?

 

[justoffal]

Montana leading the climate change fight??
Not what most would expect, unless they know Montana--a state that always goes its own way--and pays little attention to the national culture wars rhetoric:

Global warming can't be ignored, Montana's top court says, upholding landmark climate case

Montana’s Supreme Court has upheld a landmark climate ruling that said the state was violating residents’ constitutional right to a clean environment.

apnews.com

Montana’s Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a landmark climate ruling that said the state was violating residents’ constitutional right to a clean environment by permitting oil, gas and coal projects without regard for global warming.
The justices, in a 6-1 ruling, rejected the state’s argument that greenhouse gases released from Montana fossil fuel projects are minuscule on a global scale and reducing them would have no effect on climate change, likening it to asking: “If everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?”

The plaintiffs can enforce their environmental rights “without requiring everyone else to stop jumping off bridges or adding fuel to the fire,” Chief Justice Mike McGrath wrote for the majority. “Otherwise the right to a clean and healthful environment is meaningless.”

Only a few other states, including Hawaii, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and New York, have similar environmental protections enshrined in their constitutions.

The lawsuit filed in 2020 by 16 Montanans —who are now ages 7 to 23 — was considered a breakthrough in attempts by young environmentalists and their attorneys to use the courts to leverage action on climate change.

Montana Supreme Court affirms decision in Held, historic youth climate case • Daily Montanan

Limit on analysis of greenhouse gas emissions unconstitutional, court says in 6-1 opinion

dailymontanan.com

The Montana Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a district court ruling in the nation’s first constitutional climate change trial , affirming that the youth plaintiffs have a “fundamental constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment” while revoking two Montana statutes.

The 70-page decision, authored by Chief Justice Mike McGrath, comes 16 months after Lewis and Clark District Court Judge Kathy Seeley ruled in the landmark Held v. Montana lawsuit, explicitly stating that the state’s greenhouse gas emissions are “proven to be a substantial factor in causing climate impacts to Montana’s environment, and harm and injury to the youth plaintiffs.” Seeley’s decision also rolled back two laws enacted by the 2023 legislature that changed the Montana Environmental Policy Act.

The state immediately appealed the decision to the Montana Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments in the appeal in July. The court found in a 6-to-1 decision that Montana’s constitutional guarantee of a “clean and healthful environment” includes a stable climate system, “which is clearly within the object and true principles of the Framers inclusion of the right.”

“Plaintiffs showed at trial—without dispute—that climate change is harming Montana’s environmental life support system now and with increasing severity for the foreseeable future,” the order states. “Plaintiffs showed that climate change does impact the clear, unpolluted air of the Bob Marshall wilderness; it does impact the availability of clear water and clear air in the Bull Mountains; and it does exacerbate the wildfire stench in Missoula, along with the rest of the State.”

YAWWWWWN.....

This age like a sack of fish guts on a hot sidewalk in 100° weather.