HaShev
Platinum Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 17,897
- 7,170
- 375
When they converted the discovered Mithraic temples into their bascilica churches like the Basilica of San Clemente, they found there Mithraic relics like a sickly man on the cross at the altar. A Mithraic idol predating Christianity and thus reused by the church even though their character is said to be stoned and hanged on a tree.
When Ezekiel 28 talks about the son of perdition, he calls it a "created" image, one that walked the Garden of Eden (ancient Persia) where Mithra was born out of Mythology.
What is a created image? It's not that Lucifer was created in the sense man is created, a created image is a different meaning as in a fabrication of ones persona.
The Image of the Beast mentioned in REV 13:14-15
can mean the actual idol/icon they created in
the cross{mark of death}with a man suffering on it, or the Images we portray in falsely trying to create a history or air about someone. (creating their public image)
Example;
The Kennedy’s Camelot image farce was all a staged promotion propaganda media marketing gimick, it was all created image....
George Washington never had a Cherry Tree, the story was for pure image to give him an air about him and teach a lesson about honesty. This is being taught and printed in our history school books even though ironically they have to lie to our kids while teaching about honesty...
Houdini never was traped under the ice as claimed, the whole story was made up to give him a supernatural mysterious image, yet people swear they witnessed it and people act as if these things are fact and true...
Rob and Fab never sang any of the songs for Milli Vanilli, they were used as mere pretty boy images to fool the mass audience...
It's been a well known fact that many don't believe Shakespeare actually wrote those books attributed to him. Facts point to the possibility that an Oxford group of writers thought it a good idea to have a flesh-and-blood author to point to, and paid him to be their image for the books authorship.
Something very similar to the Rob and Fab scam, but do people know about this or research these things or do they just accept whats fed to them? If they would question this whole page of mine's validity without reason, yet accept their own beliefs without researching, then they aren't being rational or honest with themselves and they leave themselves open to these kinds of Image perception deceptions...
Professor Uri Millstein's book “The Rabin File” caused a sensation years ago, because it shattered the myth of Yitzhak Rabin-War Hero. Relying heavily on first hand eye-witness reports, Millstein presented a portrait of Rabin-being a bit of a Coward. The War Hero label was just an image to help sell him to the public...
The Jesus myths borrowed and even designed by imagery of the early scripture and other culture deities is all an illusion, an image thus an Icon is born....
“The Image” is The deceptive compiled Image in order to mask the Beast (aka Lord of Death). They all have something in common by these images, everyone swore by them & were so easily fooled and deceived.
When Ezekiel 28 talks about the son of perdition, he calls it a "created" image, one that walked the Garden of Eden (ancient Persia) where Mithra was born out of Mythology.
What is a created image? It's not that Lucifer was created in the sense man is created, a created image is a different meaning as in a fabrication of ones persona.
The Image of the Beast mentioned in REV 13:14-15
can mean the actual idol/icon they created in
the cross{mark of death}with a man suffering on it, or the Images we portray in falsely trying to create a history or air about someone. (creating their public image)
Example;
The Kennedy’s Camelot image farce was all a staged promotion propaganda media marketing gimick, it was all created image....
George Washington never had a Cherry Tree, the story was for pure image to give him an air about him and teach a lesson about honesty. This is being taught and printed in our history school books even though ironically they have to lie to our kids while teaching about honesty...
Houdini never was traped under the ice as claimed, the whole story was made up to give him a supernatural mysterious image, yet people swear they witnessed it and people act as if these things are fact and true...
Rob and Fab never sang any of the songs for Milli Vanilli, they were used as mere pretty boy images to fool the mass audience...
It's been a well known fact that many don't believe Shakespeare actually wrote those books attributed to him. Facts point to the possibility that an Oxford group of writers thought it a good idea to have a flesh-and-blood author to point to, and paid him to be their image for the books authorship.
Something very similar to the Rob and Fab scam, but do people know about this or research these things or do they just accept whats fed to them? If they would question this whole page of mine's validity without reason, yet accept their own beliefs without researching, then they aren't being rational or honest with themselves and they leave themselves open to these kinds of Image perception deceptions...
Professor Uri Millstein's book “The Rabin File” caused a sensation years ago, because it shattered the myth of Yitzhak Rabin-War Hero. Relying heavily on first hand eye-witness reports, Millstein presented a portrait of Rabin-being a bit of a Coward. The War Hero label was just an image to help sell him to the public...
The Jesus myths borrowed and even designed by imagery of the early scripture and other culture deities is all an illusion, an image thus an Icon is born....
“The Image” is The deceptive compiled Image in order to mask the Beast (aka Lord of Death). They all have something in common by these images, everyone swore by them & were so easily fooled and deceived.