EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,158
- 1,100
do you agree with 9th and 10th amendments??No kidding. English still isn't your first language.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
do you agree with 9th and 10th amendments??No kidding. English still isn't your first language.
Im sure they didnt bank on americans literally begging in the streets for the fed gov to take away their rights either.Todays "liberalism" is complete statism which goes against the USC
yes, odd isn't it how free speech, religion ,guns were written well enough to still have meaning today while the basic concept of freedom was written so poorly into the Constitution that liberals can get away with ignoring it. Our Founders didn't know that they had to write for children or perhaps how unnatural freedom was.
Of course I agree with the 9th and 10th Amendments. I'm the only realconstitutionalist on this board. I take the bad with the good.do you agree with 9th and 10th amendments??No kidding. English still isn't your first language.
If you have evidence of that I'll pay you $10,000. Bet???You hate the Constitution more than anyone.
what about them do you like?Of course I agree with the 9th and 10th Amendments.
Im sure they didnt bank on americans literally begging in the streets for the fed gov to take away their rights either.
If you have evidence of that I'll pay you $10,000. Bet???You hate the Constitution more than anyone.
what about them do you like?Of course I agree with the 9th and 10th Amendments.
seems like trivial matter compared to our issue here which is liberal usurpation of our basic freedoms. Do you understand?I showed you where the ONLY authority the feds have over foreigners is naturalization. Naturalization is citizenship. All the other laws are unconstitutional and a usurpation of powers that belong to the individual states... using your Tenth Amendment argument as proof.
I see, and which rights do you feel are most threatened by the treasonous liberals?Our Rights cannot be denied; if it isn't in the Constitution, the authority rests with the states or the people respectively.
Mr. soap opera strikes againIf you have evidence of that I'll pay you $10,000. Bet???You hate the Constitution more than anyone.
If you have the money to cover the bet, I do. Do you want to revisit the thread where you rode my ass with nothing comments for .... how many posts? Don't forget, I'm coming to the table with nearly four decades of experience - and a HELL of a lot of it legal experience. I've forgotten more than you're capable of understanding. And when I take a position, I'm having to accept rulings I don't agree with. So, this is knowledge based, not what is popular.
We can get some rules going and do this somewhere. It will have to be time based so you don't get to spend time cheating with the Internet and getting outside advice. You pick the topic, we have a time limit on the responses and see who turns in the most fact based answers with supporting evidence (court cases, references to what people in power / authority said or ruled), etc.
seems like trivial matter compared to our issue here which is liberal usurpation of our basic freedoms. Do you understand?I showed you where the ONLY authority the feds have over foreigners is naturalization. Naturalization is citizenship. All the other laws are unconstitutional and a usurpation of powers that belong to the individual states... using your Tenth Amendment argument as proof.
I see, and which rights do you feel are most threatened by the treasonous liberals?Our Rights cannot be denied; if it isn't in the Constitution, the authority rests with the states or the people respectively.
Mr. soap opera strikes againIf you have evidence of that I'll pay you $10,000. Bet???You hate the Constitution more than anyone.
If you have the money to cover the bet, I do. Do you want to revisit the thread where you rode my ass with nothing comments for .... how many posts? Don't forget, I'm coming to the table with nearly four decades of experience - and a HELL of a lot of it legal experience. I've forgotten more than you're capable of understanding. And when I take a position, I'm having to accept rulings I don't agree with. So, this is knowledge based, not what is popular.
We can get some rules going and do this somewhere. It will have to be time based so you don't get to spend time cheating with the Internet and getting outside advice. You pick the topic, we have a time limit on the responses and see who turns in the most fact based answers with supporting evidence (court cases, references to what people in power / authority said or ruled), etc.
cons the right into doing their dirty work
the liberals want to erase the history of Posterity
cons the right into doing their dirty work
for 42nd time can you tell your most important example of this or must you admit it is BS with your silence or attempts to change subject.
the liberals want to erase the history of Posterity
They think it is an evil history. why do you disagree?
For the 43rd time do you have example or just more of your BS?cons the right into doing their dirty work
It's evil to feed the world, fight their wars and get our own killed, and provide humanitarian aid all over the place. Nah. Don't think so.