Trump's Great (Constitutional) Accomplishment Ignored

DGS49

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
20,002
Reaction score
21,444
Points
2,415
Location
Pittsburgh

Sorry about the pay wall, but you get the idea.

American public opinion has reached a crescendo of interest in the ill-advised but prevailing policy of granting instant U.S. citizenship to anyone with the good fortune of being born within our borders. The political sides are diametrically opposed on (a) whether it's a good idea in itself (it's not), and (b) what does the 14th Amendment really mean?

Both sides trot out their legal/Constitutional "experts" who spout opposit conclusions on the question, all with great authority.

Thank God we have a President with the balls to bring it to a head, so that at some point the PEOPLE might weigh in, toss out some Democrats and get the ball at least rolling in the right direction.

Same with Iran. Every President since 1979 has bitched and moaned the same thing...Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and now we have a President who actually does something about it. And as with birthright citizens, Democrats are whining because....well, they just are.
 

Sorry about the pay wall, but you get the idea.

American public opinion has reached a crescendo of interest in the ill-advised but prevailing policy of granting instant U.S. citizenship to anyone with the good fortune of being born within our borders. The political sides are diametrically opposed on (a) whether it's a good idea in itself (it's not), and (b) what does the 14th Amendment really mean?

Both sides trot out their legal/Constitutional "experts" who spout opposit conclusions on the question, all with great authority.

Thank God we have a President with the balls to bring it to a head, so that at some point the PEOPLE might weigh in, toss out some Democrats and get the ball at least rolling in the right direction.

Same with Iran. Every President since 1979 has bitched and moaned the same thing...Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and now we have a President who actually does something about it. And as with birthright citizens, Democrats are whining because....well, they just are.
If Trump has balls he would stop Russia from helping Iran. He rewarded Russia by lifting their oil restrictions. Those are the actions of a balless man
 

Sorry about the pay wall, but you get the idea.

American public opinion has reached a crescendo of interest in the ill-advised but prevailing policy of granting instant U.S. citizenship to anyone with the good fortune of being born within our borders. The political sides are diametrically opposed on (a) whether it's a good idea in itself (it's not), and (b) what does the 14th Amendment really mean?

Both sides trot out their legal/Constitutional "experts" who spout opposit conclusions on the question, all with great authority.

Thank God we have a President with the balls to bring it to a head, so that at some point the PEOPLE might weigh in, toss out some Democrats and get the ball at least rolling in the right direction.

Same with Iran. Every President since 1979 has bitched and moaned the same thing...Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and now we have a President who actually does something about it. And as with birthright citizens, Democrats are whining because....well, they just are.
Yes, a president with the balls to go after Greenland... and to then declare success after doing nothing, and then give.

Takes balls to be that ******* moronic.
 
If Trump has balls he would stop Russia from helping Iran. He rewarded Russia by lifting their oil restrictions. Those are the actions of a balless man
Yes, he literally rewarded Russia because he invaded Russia's ally and the one providing cheap drones to kill people.

He doesn't get it.
 

Sorry about the pay wall, but you get the idea.

American public opinion has reached a crescendo of interest in the ill-advised but prevailing policy of granting instant U.S. citizenship to anyone with the good fortune of being born within our borders. The political sides are diametrically opposed on (a) whether it's a good idea in itself (it's not), and (b) what does the 14th Amendment really mean?

Both sides trot out their legal/Constitutional "experts" who spout opposit conclusions on the question, all with great authority.

Thank God we have a President with the balls to bring it to a head, so that at some point the PEOPLE might weigh in, toss out some Democrats and get the ball at least rolling in the right direction.

Same with Iran. Every President since 1979 has bitched and moaned the same thing...Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and now we have a President who actually does something about it. And as with birthright citizens, Democrats are whining because....well, they just are.

Because it is on its face UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
 
If Trump has balls he would stop Russia from helping Iran. He rewarded Russia by lifting their oil restrictions. Those are the actions of a balless man
He is weak against the strong and strong against the weak like many of the most famous villains in history and fiction
 
Option 1: I am 99% convinced these Trumpaloons are Eastern European troll farm employees.
Option 2: I leave room for 1% chance the OP is a liberal posting nonsense to make Trumpaloons look like morons

Evidence
1. Trump was laughed out of the Supreme Court and sent packing. This was blatantly un-American and unconstitutional.

2. Iran was a huge mistake and took a shitty presidency and turned it into the worst presidency.
 
Back
Top Bottom