- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,422
- 54,238
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #81
It was a Sumerian city state, as I understand it.Nope, Abraham was from Urfa near Haran.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It was a Sumerian city state, as I understand it.Nope, Abraham was from Urfa near Haran.
does not matter----the DOMINANT culture in the land was the DOMINANT SUMERIANNope, Abraham was from Urfa near Haran.
In fact, the family of Abraham was somewhat migratoryIt was a Sumerian city state, as I understand it.
Musta been there.
Paying attention to whom.Why are you paying attention then?
You asked a stupid question. This makes you look even more derpified.This literally makes no sense. Just disagree to be disagreeable
WTF are you disagreeing with? You're losing any credibility here you may have had .
You got owned and you want to pretend otherwise
View attachment 813141
Proves nothing loon.Ugarit - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Proves nothing loon.
Enjoyed your reply .Subject is really too complex and detailed for this medium , but -----
Have you looked at there being more than one and several flood events ?
Have you looked at there being several different visits at different locations ? With the Nephilim being just one group , possibly the so called Anunnaki?
Doesnt count. Beliefs doesnt counter facts.
So just tiny differences. Like story of adam and eve in both accounts. You believe adam was made from dust, and they say adam was bred with the aliens. Small details like that mean nothing in the grand scheme of things. Especially when the annunaki version is natural, and the abrahamic version is gods wrath and vengeance. Its silly to think that is a valid reason the story wasnt ripped off.
The similarities of the flood are astronomical. Such as a man being told to build a boat. The boat landing on the same mountain. Etc.
You say your religion wasnt ripped off, when all logic points to it being plagiarized.
You musta been there huh?
The story of the annunaki is that they were aliens.Thanks. No, I haven't looked into the possibility of other (earlier) flood events… but funny, you should mention that, I was just talking on the phone with someone who brought up the same thing. As for the Nephilim… I have looked into it because I find that topic fascinating, but it's been a while, so I actually want to get back to it and dig deeper into that topic… as well as the Anunnaki. What are your thoughts on this? Do you believe it's all mythology that's pure fiction or do you lean toward the view that a few on this thread seem to hold, that they were talking about aliens?
The story of the annunaki is that they were aliens.
To deny this, is to deny the story. Which is ridiculous.
Because your only argument was ridiculously small details. When you stick to small things like that, it shows you are grasping at whatever you can.You didn't address 98% of what I said, but whatever, I'm not gonna go back-and-forth with you if you ignore most of what I posted and also won't take a few minutes of time to watch part of a video that addresses the claims you've been making. That to me shows that getting to the actual truth is not your goal. And glancing at your reply above again, I am actually amazed that you're saying things that are so demonstrably false, and it appears that you didn't even read my post, or if you did, you skimmed over it quickly.