That 2019 impeachment

[markef]

What was the innacuracy?

You guys think that any complaint coming from a "politically biased" person should be disregarded. Then you also define anyone who would complain about Trump as "politically baised".

In your universe, there can never be a legitimate whistleblower complaint against Trump. You've erected an impenetrable barrier against all potential scandal.

There was nothing accurate about either democrat attempt to overthrow the US President through bogus impeachments.

 

[markef]

But it was an urgent concern. We know that because of the investigation that took place as a result of the complaint.

Overthrowing Trump was of an urgent concern to democrats who have a long history of fraud, corruption, perversion of justice, and other illegalities to gain illegitimate power and to hold onto that illegitimate power.

 

[markef]

The IG is the one that determined it was an urgent concern. Are you saying the IG is politically biased now?

Basically you’re whole problem is that Congress found out about Trump’s scheme.

The democrats cooked up the fake scenario against Trump in their desperation to take him out of their way.

 

[Marener]

Overthrowing Trump was of an urgent concern to democrats who have a long history of fraud, corruption, perversion of justice, and other illegalities to gain illegitimate power and to hold onto that illegitimate power.

Impeachment is in the constitution. That makes it legitimate use of government.

Why don't you go read the constitution before you keep replying.

 

[markef]

Isn’t Trump politically biased against Biden?

I would imagine democrats are biased against republicans and republicans are biased against democrats. That does not mean that any or all attempts to prosecute opponents are right or wrong. Facts matter, regardless of political biases and feelings. Court cases should be based upon facts, not lies, emotions, biases, or feelings.

 

[markef]

You didn’t answer the question. Doesn’t Trump have political bias against Biden?

I certainly hope Trump is biased against every crook and thug, including those greatly influencing the democrat party.

 

[markef]

And why should we consider the opinion of biased Trump administration lawyers to be true?

Let the facts come out and the lies be exposed. This is not just a partisan issue anymore. Now it is a matter of Justice.

 

[markef]

So you’re okay with politically biased people when they’re biased in your favor?

Biases should not matter when it comes to executing untarnished justice.

 

[markef]

There is no Constitutional mechanism to undo, expunge, or reverse an Impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Perhaps you could try to expunge the fact that "Benedict Donald was impeached, twice" from being taught in schools and the history books too......Call it CRT or DEI or BFD.

Trump was wickedly framed, defamed, unjustly criminally charged, falsely impeached, and shot by democrats. That history cannot be erased.

 

[markef]

So you’re okay with politically biased investigations when Trump does it.

Crooks will always claim the cops are racists as if their arrect and charges were unjust. Democrats claim any prosecution of a democrat for crimes committed is an unjust biased prosecution. Such excuses do not hold water.

 

[markef]

The facts that are massaged because they have political bias.

Isn’t that what you were once so worried about?

I am surprised every time I hear a democrat admit that facts can be 'messaged' to make a lie look factual.

 

[Lockback]

I am surprised every time I hear a democrat admit that facts can be 'messaged' to make a lie look factual.

It's common practice for them.

 

[Delldude]

The law does not require first hand knowledge. End of story.

It was IC policy and Atkinson changed the reporting requirement after WB filed his complaint.

End of story.

As was reported at the time, IC OIG altered the whistleblower form within months of the July 2019 phone call to no longer require firsthand knowledge as a prerequisite for reporting complaints.

 

[markef]

When you start whining about "political bias", you open yourself up to criticism for your own political bias.

Unless you're MAGA, in which case you can just do whatever you want and attack others.

Democrats claim they are under MAGA attack as if that is supposed to make tens of millions of Trump-supporting Americans evil or stupid.

 

[markef]

The whistleblower reported questionable actions and they needed to be investigated.

BUT WAIT! The whistleblower might be politically biased, which means that their complaint needs to be ignored. To do otherwise is fraud that demands accountability and criminal prosecution.

So say the politically biased investigators.

What the Trump administration is doing is lawfare, designed to punish anyone who may want to report the questionable actions of this administration.

It is not the bias that has put Schiff and gang in trouble with the law, it is the lying, violations of Trump's civil rights, and sedition against the President of the US.

 

[markef]

Trump didn't say what he is recorded as saying

Swear

Schiff invented an altered version of Trump's call which was illegally leaked by a criminal to Schiff before Schiff changed the wording to dishonestly make Trump look like Biden with some quid-pro-quo threat of some implied sort.

 

[markef]

What does the whistleblower have to do with the Trump defense? They had nothing to do with the nature of the evidence. They weren't a witness to anything. Just a tipster.

The evidence presented a trial stood on it's own.

It is unconstitutional for a defendant to be tried without being able to cross examine a hearsay witness. The anonymous hearsay 'whistleblower' was dishonestly and unjustly protected from cross examination by the crooks railroading Trump in their one-sided democrat party kangaroo court.

 

[markef]

The Senate doesn't complete an impeachment. You mean the Senate didn't convict him and remove him from office. That doesn't change the fact that the House of Representatives impeached him, twice. Bill Clinton wasn't convicted or removed from the office either, but he too was Impeached by the House. Nothing the DOJ can do can reverse the impeachment votes. There is no Constitutional eraser that will ever take them away.

Democrat crooks in the House illegally impeached their archrival in a clearly dishonest bid to destroy him for their own corrupt political gain.

 

[markef]

Only one chamber impeaches. Senators have no vote on impeachment. The process was completed by the Senate with the trial of the President. They are like the jury in the trial.

Trump's defense was hogtied in the Senate just like it was in the House. The whole impeachment scam will forever remain a despicable blot on the US government throughout future history.

 

[markef]

Impeachment is a Constitutional Process. Nor does it end with criminal liability. That would be left up to the Courts. The only coup we've seen was when Benedict Donald tried to fraudulently switch forged slates of electors into the Jan 6th count of the states certified EC votes. Wouldn't you like to see Jack Smith have his day in court to finish the case against Benedict Donald and his cohorts?

Democrats blocked investigations into voter fraud and then jailed voters for claiming the election looked like it had been stolen. The truth is now coming out and the democrats are being found liars for claiming their election processes were clean and pure and without fraud or error.