That 2019 impeachment

Well I guess we're going to find out who's right here....
How exactly are we going to “find out”?
There, fixed it for you.
Editing other people’s posts is against the rules.

The list of people this administration has persecuted for speaking out against them is long and growing. The whistleblower is just the latest example. We recently heard that they’re going after Cassidy Hutchinson.

Not sure who you think you’re referring to.
 
Coup is a word used to describe illegal means to remove an incumbent. But in our case, we have Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the constitution, for the house. And then Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6-7 for the senate. This makes it a legal process.

The topic of this thread pertains to an abuse of power, which involved withholding congressionally approved funds in exchange for political favor. This is why the impeachment process occurred.
Obama read the intelligence report clearing Russia and it pissed him off. HE told the intelligence to blame it all on Trump. This was illegal as hell.
 
How exactly are we going to “find out”?

Editing other people’s posts is against the rules.

The list of people this administration has persecuted for speaking out against them is long and growing. The whistleblower is just the latest example. We recently heard that they’re going after Cassidy Hutchinson.

Not sure who you think you’re referring to.
She was part of the plot to overthrow Trump. Obama is the author of the plot to overthrow the Government.
 
In what respect? Democrats are the king authoritarians. You support them.
Trump is the authoritarian. He’s using the government to after anyone he doesn’t like, especially those who reveal his corruption to the American people.

Prosecuting whistleblowers is the kind of thing authoritarians do to keep the people in the dark.
 
Prosecuting whistleblowers is the kind of thing authoritarians do to keep the people in the dark.
Hearsay isn't admissible per DNI reporting protocols......only first hand knowledge.
 
Hearsay isn't admissible per DNI reporting protocols......only first hand knowledge.
DNI doesn’t make the law and the law doesn’t require first hand knowledge.

DNI is overstepping their authority.
 
I didn't say that did I?
You said:
“It's about established policy IAW the law.“

That’s wrong. “Policy” is not the same as “the law”.

The law does not require first hand information. No policy can change that.
 
You said:
“It's about established policy IAW the law.“

That’s wrong. “Policy” is not the same as “the law”.

The law does not require first hand information. No policy can change that.
Hey sweetie, IAW means In Accordance With...... :eek:
No policy can change that.
No kidding? Why did Atkinson change the policy by himself outside of the law?

bernie-sanders-boxing.gif
 
Last edited:
15th post
Obama read the intelligence report clearing Russia and it pissed him off. HE told the intelligence to blame it all on Trump. This was illegal as hell.
the first impeachment of Trump was due to his phone call with Zelensky.
Russia has nothing to do with that. you must be referring to something else entirely.
 
the first impeachment of Trump was due to his phone call with Zelensky.
Russia has nothing to do with that. you must be referring to something else entirely.
Fingerprints from the left you stooge.
 
Does the law require the whistleblower to have first hand information or not?
You don't read what you post?

Looks like what Tulsi has said is correct...............you clowns are toast.

At the time the Complainant filed the Disclosure of Urgent Concern form with the IC IG on August 12, 2019, the ICIG followed its routine practice and provided the Complainant information, including “Background Information on ICWPA Process,” which included the following language:

In order to find an urgent concern “credible,” the IC IG must be in possession of reliable, first-hand information. The IC IG cannot transmit information via the ICWPA based
on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing. This includes information received from another person, such as when a fellow employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing.

(Anyone with first-hand knowledge of the allegations may file a disclosure in writing directly with the IC IG.)

Similarly, speculation about the existence of wrongdoing does not provide sufficient basis to meet the statutory requirements of the ICWPA. If you think wrong doing took place, but can provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions, IC IG will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA

bernie-sanders-boxing.gif
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom