That 2019 impeachment

Your concern about messaging facts to fit a narrative is suddenly gone when your politically biased hacks are doing it to benefit Trump.
There is spin and there is altering evidence.

You seem to conveniently confuse the two to your advantage.

And still fail.
 
I was thinking about this also. It's shown that Democrats broke laws to usurp a president's power and attempt to remove Him from office. Ilegal fraudulent accusations. Their findings should be reversed and Trump's impeachment removed.



2019? do you know what's happening this year 2026? Want to spend our time & money on this. Even if it was a bad idea, Why now?
 
Accountability.
Politically biased people launching an investigation into people who they accuse of being politically biased when they launched an investigation.

It's so incredibly stupid.
 
I was thinking about this also. It's shown that Democrats broke laws to usurp a president's power and attempt to remove Him from office. Ilegal fraudulent accusations. Their findings should be reversed and Trump's impeachment removed.



Obama did far worse than protest, he took Government action when he was in his final days to overthrow the Government. Schiff was in the action as well. You can't get rid of Obama, but Schiff still can be dealt with.
 
Sounds like Obama and Russia... :badgrin:
When you start whining about "political bias", you open yourself up to criticism for your own political bias.

Unless you're MAGA, in which case you can just do whatever you want and attack others.
 
When you start whining about "political bias", you open yourself up to criticism for your own political bias.
At least you've proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that you have no political bias.

There's enough questionable actions that took place that need to be reinvestigated.

The result of all this lawfare was to take out Trump. They were so sure they could stop Him from ever running again they weren't worried about anyone ever looking into their actions......well guess what.

The biased DoJ lawyer came up with a sorry excuse for a technicality to suppress the complaint.

Sounds good, let's see your link.
 
Not being convicted by the Senate doesn't expunge, remove, or nullify the impeachment by the House either.
It’s not a completed impeachment until both houses declare such findings.
You got half a dinner and not a whole one but your TDS feelings dictate otherwise
 
It’s not a completed impeachment until both houses declare such findings.
You got half a dinner and not a whole one but your TDS feelings dictate otherwise
My point exactly. An impeachment is failed with out a conviction.
 
Not being convicted by the Senate doesn't expunge, remove, or nullify the impeachment by the House either.

My point exactly. An impeachment is failed with out a conviction.
Well one body did impeach him but the other equal body did not so there was no completed impeachment as required and merely an attempt.
 
At least you've proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that you have no political bias.

There's enough questionable actions that took place that need to be reinvestigated.

The result of all this lawfare was to take out Trump. They were so sure they could stop Him from ever running again they weren't worried about anyone ever looking into their actions......well guess what.



Sounds good, let's see your link.
The whistleblower reported questionable actions and they needed to be investigated.

BUT WAIT! The whistleblower might be politically biased, which means that their complaint needs to be ignored. To do otherwise is fraud that demands accountability and criminal prosecution.

So say the politically biased investigators.

What the Trump administration is doing is lawfare, designed to punish anyone who may want to report the questionable actions of this administration.
 
Back
Top Bottom