That 2019 impeachment

[Marener]

Get around 'facts of the case and applicable law'.

Your continual whining about second hand information?

As was reported at the time, IC OIG altered the whistleblower form within months of the July 2019 phone call to no longer require firsthand knowledge as a prerequisite for reporting complaints.

The facts that are massaged because they have political bias.

Isn’t that what you were once so worried about?

 

[Alweysrite!]

So you’re okay with politically biased investigations when Trump does it.

Can you point to any of those?

 

[Delldude]

The facts that are massaged because they have political bias.

Isn’t that what you were once so worried about?

Facts of the case and applicable law......aren't political bias.......spin away. And the WB form required first hand knowledge......why did the IG remove that requirement AFTER the phone call was revealed?

You're running out of spin.

 

[Marener]

Can you point to any of those?

Facts of the case and applicable law......aren't political bias.......spin away. And the WB form required first hand knowledge......why did the IG remove that requirement AFTER the phone call was revealed?

You're running out of spin.

I’m not spinning. I’m using your own rhetoric against you, which you’re just ignoring because you have no argument.

Your concern about messaging facts to fit a narrative is suddenly gone when your politically biased hacks are doing it to benefit Trump.

 

[Alweysrite!]

I’m not spinning. I’m using your own rhetoric against you, which you’re just ignoring because you have no argument.

Your concern about messaging facts to fit a narrative is suddenly gone when your politically biased hacks are doing it to benefit Trump.

I’m not spinning. I’m using your own rhetoric against you, which you’re just ignoring because you have no argument.

Your concern about messaging facts to fit a narrative is suddenly gone when your politically biased hacks are doing it to benefit Trump.

Can you point to any of those?
So you cannot, I see

 

[Delldude]

I’m not spinning. I’m using your own rhetoric against you, which you’re just ignoring because you have no argument.

Your concern about messaging facts to fit a narrative is suddenly gone when your politically biased hacks are doing it to benefit Trump.

Messaging facts?

Atkinson made a criminal referral to DOJ, who looked at the facts and the WB requirements and applicable law for 'urgent concern' status.

The IG changed the WB form so first hand knowledge wasn't needed.....?

 

[Marener]

Messaging facts?

Atkinson made a criminal referral to DOJ, who looked at the facts and the WB requirements and applicable law for 'urgent concern' status.

The IG changed the WB form so first hand knowledge wasn't needed.....?

Yep. Massaging facts. Some Trump biased hack massaged the facts to determine that the report shouldn’t go to Congress because they were trying to cover up a scandal for Trump.

The problem with whining about “political bias” is that you’re all politically biased and so you’re creating a situation where no one ever has to consider anything anyone says, which is convenient for people that want to ignore Trump’s malfeasance.

This isn’t about the law, it’s about covering up for Trump.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Yep. Massaging facts. Some Trump biased hack massaged the facts to determine that the report shouldn’t go to Congress because they were trying to cover up a scandal for Trump.

The problem with whining about “political bias” is that you’re all politically biased and so you’re creating a situation where no one ever has to consider anything anyone says, which is convenient for people that want to ignore Trump’s malfeasance.

This isn’t about the law, it’s about covering up for Trump.

Your problem is it's pretty much all made up and there's nothing to cover up for. LOL, so dishonest.
Why do you think Biden pardoned his family for the last 10 years of crime?

 

[Delldude]

Some Trump biased hack massaged the facts to determine that the report shouldn’t go to Congress because they were trying to cover up a scandal for Trump.

Sure it isn't some Biden backed hacks massaged the facts to create a scandal for Trump?

I'm sure the DOJ opinion based on the facts and law, plus the Office of Legal Counsel's advice are well documented and have been sent along with Gabbard's referral.

 

[Marener]

Sure it isn't some Biden backed hacks massaged the facts to create a scandal for Trump?

I'm sure the DOJ opinion based on the facts and law, plus the Office of Legal Counsel's advice are well documented and have been sent along with Gabbard's referral.

Why are you sure that the DoJ opinion is based on facts and law? The lawyers are all politically biased.

Gabbard is also politically biased, so her referral is also politically motivated, that could result in politically motivated criminal charges.

Seems like you're okay with political bias when it serves your purposes. No?

 

[Delldude]

Why are you sure that the DoJ opinion is based on facts and law?

There would be a record of it.....

Why didn't the IG, when told it didn't meet the legal requirements for an urgent concern, not conduct his own investigation to determine just that? He instead sent his legally unsupported allegations to congress.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Why are you sure that the DoJ opinion is based on facts and law? The lawyers are all politically biased.

Gabbard is also politically biased, so her referral is also politically motivated, that could result in politically motivated criminal charges.

Seems like you're okay with political bias when it serves your purposes. No?

Seems like you're okay with political bias when it serves your purposes. No?

This statement fits you to a T. Project much?

 

[Marener]

There would be a record of it.....

Why didn't the IG, when told it didn't meet the legal requirements for an urgent concern, not conduct his own investigation to determine just that? He instead sent his legally unsupported allegations to congress.

There is record of it.

The IG, who is not politically biased, did not agree with the conclusion from the Trump biased lawyer, based on their massaged facts. They decided this based on upon their own investigation.

You demand that we accept the decision of the DoJ, even though they're very politically biased. Why is that?

Because you wanted there to be a cover up.

 

[WEATHER53]

There is no Constitutional mechanism to undo, expunge, or reverse an Impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Perhaps you could try to expunge the fact that "Benedict Donald was impeached, twice" from being taught in schools and the history books too......Call it CRT or DEI or BFD.

Neither impeachment attempt was fully approved as required

 

[Delldude]

The IG, who is not politically biased, did not agree with the conclusion from the Trump biased lawyer, based on their massaged facts. They decided this based on upon their own investigation.

IG should have investigated and didn't. But there's absolutely no chance in hell that this was politically motivated.....

Link to these massaged facts?

 

[Marener]

IG should have investigated and didn't. But there's absolutely no chance in hell that this was politically motivated.....

Link to these massaged facts?

They did investigate, which is why they determined it was an urgent concern and credible. The IG investigation was not politically motivated.

The biased DoJ lawyer came up with a sorry excuse for a technicality to suppress the complaint. It had nothing to do with the substance of the whistleblower report.

Didn't you know that?

 

[BlindBoo]

Neither impeachment attempt was fully approved as required

Not being convicted by the Senate doesn't expunge, remove, or nullify the impeachment by the House either.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Not being convicted by the Senate doesn't expunge, remove, or nullify the impeachment by the House either.

That's right.

That fact that it was a Kangaroo Court stands on it's own.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Yep. Massaging facts. Some Trump biased hack massaged the facts to determine that the report shouldn’t go to Congress because they were trying to cover up a scandal for Trump.

The problem with whining about “political bias” is that you’re all politically biased and so you’re creating a situation where no one ever has to consider anything anyone says, which is convenient for people that want to ignore Trump’s malfeasance.

This isn’t about the law, it’s about covering up for Trump.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Your concern about messaging facts to fit a narrative is suddenly gone when your politically biased hacks are doing it to benefit Trump.

There is spin and there is altering evidence.

You seem to conveniently confuse the two to your advantage.

And still fail.