Texas to arrest Sanctuary City Leaders, Police Chiefs, etc...

Well, I guess that, in spite of all the posturing by Trump, everything is going to be alright. Juan still prunes my citrus trees in the Spring, and takes care of my weeds and such all year, and Maria still does a deep clean of my house every month. Being self employed, they don't seem to be too upset about being rounded up at a grape farm by the Gestapo.
 
Again quit babbling like a two year old, the minimum wage law was enacted to keep blacks from.working and you fucking know it.


.
You are confusing black codes with minimum wage laws; to PC for the right wing?



Read a history book...


.
I have. You have nothing but red herrings. Do you believe in learning how to fish instead of learning, perfection in capital management as a "holy grail" under Any form of Capitalism?

Learning how to fish instead of learning....learning what? Learning how to fish certainly sounds better than learning nothing, which evidently you have learned well.
Now I know why, I don't need to take the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Get back to me when you figure out how to realistically discuss economics or the law.
 
You are confusing black codes with minimum wage laws; to PC for the right wing?



Read a history book...


.
I have. You have nothing but red herrings. Do you believe in learning how to fish instead of learning, perfection in capital management as a "holy grail" under Any form of Capitalism?

Learning how to fish instead of learning....learning what? Learning how to fish certainly sounds better than learning nothing, which evidently you have learned well.
Now I know why, I don't need to take the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Get back to me when you figure out how to realistically discuss economics or the law.
You are confusing black codes with minimum wage laws; to PC for the right wing?
 
You are confusing black codes with minimum wage laws; to PC for the right wing?



Read a history book...


.
I have. You have nothing but red herrings. Do you believe in learning how to fish instead of learning, perfection in capital management as a "holy grail" under Any form of Capitalism?

Learning how to fish instead of learning....learning what? Learning how to fish certainly sounds better than learning nothing, which evidently you have learned well.
Now I know why, I don't need to take the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Get back to me when you figure out how to realistically discuss economics or the law.
He can not discuss anything, he keeps referencing a law that has nothing to do with his claimed point.
 
And that's the reason they never try to get better paying jobs. As long as they can maintain a low income, they get their government goodies. Take away those government goodies, and people would try harder to increase their income and be better off in the end.

Do you really want to compete against someone willing to work for less than you do now? Because the very fact you can't rate health insurance, I don't think you'd want more people competing for your job. "Yeah, I'll hire Jamal for $5.00 less an hour than Ray. I want to go to Italy next year."

And you'll be hating on Jamal for taking your job.

You want socialism and equity? Then let me ask, why would anybody pay all that money for college if they were only going to make a couple thousand more a year than a floor sweeper?

Becuse they want to broaden their minds? I know this is a concept you don't get.
The right prefers to abolish the minimum wage so the poor can "race to the bottom" for less; and help the rich get richer, faster.


There is no push to abolish the minimum wage.

Trump's immigration polices, are all designed to reduce supply of labor and thus raise wages.

YOUR open door policies are what has been depressing wages for the working poor since 1964.
 
Prohibition is Bad and not Good. It really is that simple, right winger.


Depends on what it is.

Certainly you are not against the Prohibition against Murder, for example?
Are yo

u referring to morals or civil rights?



I'm using YOUR WORDS, and you are pretending to be confused by them?

Stop being a fucko.

My question stands, are you against the Prohibition against Murder?
Red herrings are all the right wing has; not respect for a Tradition of morals or civil rights.


You claimed that Prohibition is always bad.


As it was in reference to a law against a certain action, I am challenging your claim with a similar law that is against another action.


Prohibiting it.


Your running away from defending your position from the first little challenge, demonstrates that you yourself know that you were just talking bullshit.


My point stands. We can protect Americans from violent foreign criminals with border security.

BUILD THE FUCKING WALL.
 
Read a history book...


.
I have. You have nothing but red herrings. Do you believe in learning how to fish instead of learning, perfection in capital management as a "holy grail" under Any form of Capitalism?

Learning how to fish instead of learning....learning what? Learning how to fish certainly sounds better than learning nothing, which evidently you have learned well.
Now I know why, I don't need to take the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Get back to me when you figure out how to realistically discuss economics or the law.
He can not discuss anything, he keeps referencing a law that has nothing to do with his claimed point.

He wants to effect the Public Debate, but he knows he has to hide the fact that he is a loyal Mexican who is actively hostile to America and Americans to the point that he supports an open border even when confronted with a 14 times deported rapist who attacks an American child.
 
And that's the reason they never try to get better paying jobs. As long as they can maintain a low income, they get their government goodies. Take away those government goodies, and people would try harder to increase their income and be better off in the end.

Do you really want to compete against someone willing to work for less than you do now? Because the very fact you can't rate health insurance, I don't think you'd want more people competing for your job. "Yeah, I'll hire Jamal for $5.00 less an hour than Ray. I want to go to Italy next year."

And you'll be hating on Jamal for taking your job.

You want socialism and equity? Then let me ask, why would anybody pay all that money for college if they were only going to make a couple thousand more a year than a floor sweeper?

Becuse they want to broaden their minds? I know this is a concept you don't get.
The right prefers to abolish the minimum wage so the poor can "race to the bottom" for less; and help the rich get richer, faster.


There is no push to abolish the minimum wage.

Trump's immigration polices, are all designed to reduce supply of labor and thus raise wages.

YOUR open door policies are what has been depressing wages for the working poor since 1964.
recanting your right wing laissez-fair position for your true national socialist colors?
 
Prohibition is Bad and not Good. It really is that simple, right winger.


Depends on what it is.

Certainly you are not against the Prohibition against Murder, for example?
Are yo

u referring to morals or civil rights?



I'm using YOUR WORDS, and you are pretending to be confused by them?

Stop being a fucko.

My question stands, are you against the Prohibition against Murder?
Red herrings are all the right wing has; not respect for a Tradition of morals or civil rights.


You claimed that Prohibition is always bad.


As it was in reference to a law against a certain action, I am challenging your claim with a similar law that is against another action.


Prohibiting it.


Your running away from defending your position from the first little challenge, demonstrates that you yourself know that you were just talking bullshit.


My point stands. We can protect Americans from violent foreign criminals with border security.

BUILD THE FUCKING WALL.
Yes, dear, we have a Commerce clause, Prohibition is Bad and not Good for Commerce, well regulated.
 
When the state sues the city, NOBODY WINS. Not the taxpayers, not the citizens. Paxton is a criminal who should be in jail.


The police caught a truck full of illegals, and just let them go, into the country.

Who ever is responsible for that, should be in jail. If the city is supporting that policy, ie re-electing the people that crafted that policy and are implementing it, they are effectively waging a form of war against the federal government.
 
When the state sues the city, NOBODY WINS. Not the taxpayers, not the citizens. Paxton is a criminal who should be in jail.
In jail? For doing his job?

Don't tell me you buy all the bullshit about his "criminal" prosecution?

I know the judge who sat on his preliminary case before appointing a special prosecutor. Even that judge it was bullshit.
 
You get due process and liberty in Texas. Those sworn to uphold these principles have to be accountable if they do not. No police chief or "leader" defying the law and placing American citizens at risk should be surprised at such a response.
do your job according to the law amd demands of the jobbit your God damn politics.

goes for clerks not issuing marriage licenses for gay weddings also, BTW. don't care which side, get the politics out of it.
 
Hey, Texas can do what it wants . But the whole fight is state vs fed.

Law says Feds have the say so on immigration. Sanct cities are just going with that .
amd here comes the fight from people impacted.

people tired of it are going with that.
 
In jail? For doing his job?

Don't tell me you buy all the bullshit about his "criminal" prosecution?

I know the judge who sat on his preliminary case before appointing a special prosecutor. Even that judge it was bullshit.
What do you expect from a "disney"?
 

Forum List

Back
Top