Crixus
Gold Member
Asset forfeiture is extra Constitutional and should be abolished.
Not really, keep it but put requirements on it. I like the idea of America spending ElChapo's money. I mean hell, that's all American money anyway.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Asset forfeiture is extra Constitutional and should be abolished.
Did you know that freedom of association and contract is the law of the land?I do have a clue; why not have Hannity, come down here in the "trenches" and argue it with us, here?Ted Cruz has sold out. A wall is a waste of money and conservatives should be against it when it can be done more cheaply. That money should go to reduce the deficit.
You are stupid and know jack shit about which you speak. Stop taking your propaganda by the spoonful from Hannity and go find a clue.
We should be solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution, at our federal borders, not the interior.
But that's never how it was done. Laws were drawn up and passed to deal with wet backs in the interior. Hannity all but ignores those laws. This Enforcement needs to go beyond a wall and E-verify. A zero tolerance policy needs to be leveled at employers that makes it so they won't survive multiple violations. Fine an employer $10,000 for each illegal on the pay roll and $50,000 for every set back with stolen I9 documents. As for the wet backs, order federal prosecutors to prosecute to the fullest extant of the law. Do the same with wet backs. Charge and prosecute for false I9's. Hell, wouldn't even have to make new laws.
Yes, really. Public policy is covered by Eminent Domain.Asset forfeiture is extra Constitutional and should be abolished.
Not really, keep it but put requirements on it. I like the idea of America spending ElChapo's money. I mean hell, that's all American money anyway.
Senator Ted Cruz wants to use assets seized from drug lords such as El Chapo, the Mexican kingpin who was recently extradited to the U.S., to pay for border security and the border wall.
Ted Cruz introduces "EL CHAPO Act" to pay for the wall
- The idea: U.S. prosecutors are seeking $14 billion in drug profits and other assets from El Chapo. They also routinely seize the assets of other drug dealers and traffickers.
- The Cruz quote: "Fourteen billion dollars will go a long way toward building a wall that will keep Americans safe and hinder the illegal flow of drugs, weapons, and individuals across our southern border."
- The acronym's meaning: Ensuring Lawful Collection of Hidden Assets to Provide Order
- Why it matters: President Trump is trying to figure out how to pay for his border wall, which will require American taxpayers to front the bill, but Republicans aren't helping at the moment.
Great idea.
Senator Ted Cruz wants to use assets seized from drug lords such as El Chapo, the Mexican kingpin who was recently extradited to the U.S., to pay for border security and the border wall.
Ted Cruz introduces "EL CHAPO Act" to pay for the wall
- The idea: U.S. prosecutors are seeking $14 billion in drug profits and other assets from El Chapo. They also routinely seize the assets of other drug dealers and traffickers.
- The Cruz quote: "Fourteen billion dollars will go a long way toward building a wall that will keep Americans safe and hinder the illegal flow of drugs, weapons, and individuals across our southern border."
- The acronym's meaning: Ensuring Lawful Collection of Hidden Assets to Provide Order
- Why it matters: President Trump is trying to figure out how to pay for his border wall, which will require American taxpayers to front the bill, but Republicans aren't helping at the moment.
Great idea.
The wall is a part of the solution and no one can find a reasonable solution to illegals crossing that border without it. It is conservatives who oppose the wall who have sold out.Ted Cruz has sold out. A wall is a waste of money and conservatives should be against it when it can be done more cheaply. That money should go to reduce the deficit.