Tariff ruling.

[Zincwarrior]

Democrats appear to believe this is all over for Trump. My hunch is all the court did was delay him a bit.

Actually its q brilliant opportunity to recenter to a more systemized approach.

 

[Arresmillao]

This guy won't be speaker.
View attachment 1221466

wishful thinking!

 

[leftwinger]

Third post. This was settled 3 hours ago and posted about how. Yet Board Stained scum keep going on and on? SMH.

 

[meaner gene]

Assuming your statement is correct, then he can pursue greater authority via Congress. Whats the issue?

Actually this is another Chief Justice Roberts rubbing their nose in it.
He has often ruled an entire law to be unconstitutional because of a single fixable flaw.
Saying that they're throwing out the law in it's entirety, instead of separating the unconstitutional part, because congress can just fix the error, and enact the law anew.
Knowing that congress is so deadlocked, he knows they are incapable of doing a simple fix.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Whatever you say.

I am speaking to your observed behavior.

You are making up thoughts for another person because you can't handle what they actually said.

Spot the difference. Take your time.

Did you see Kavanaugh's dissenting opinion? What a joke. Corruption on parade. Clearly his laughable opinion was written only to soothe the fat rapist by giving him instructions to try to keep his tariffs.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sun will rise tomorrow. Guarantee it.

Better tell the fat orange rapist.

He sure is down in the dumps. Did you see how he dimmed the lights in his press conference? He's like a child.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So why didn't Republicans include tariffs in their reconciliation Bills to cement the tariffs in?

Because it would not have passed.

 

[braalian]

Or, perhaps that wasn't the real reason. An objective court defies political scrutiny. A biased one does.

It also throws critiques like yours on its backside.

are you really trying to suggest Trump doesn't operate by granting favors and political appointments in exchange for loyalty to him?

 

[Robert W]

wishful thinking!

View attachment 1221474

This is wishful thinking

 

[braalian]

I guarantee that Trump 100% assumed the justices he appointed would give him absolute loyalty and is pissed as hell that they're not.

 

[meaner gene]

Wait, if importers get charged tariffs, but they charge more for their products to pass those tariffs along, how are they harmed?

Example: the widget importer sells his widgets for $1.00. Then a 10% tariff is imposed. He now sells his widgets for $1.10. His profit is unchanged.

Did you ever take an economics class?

When the price goes up, sales go down.
So they make the same on each unit, but their revenue declines with the decline in sales.

 

[Robert W]

are you really trying to suggest Trump doesn't operate by granting favors and political appointments in exchange for loyalty to him?

You picked up that idea since it is what Democrats do.

 

[braalian]

You picked up that idea since it is what Democrats do.

oh come on

so his entourage of sycophants he's appointed to high positions are just "true believers'" who support him based on genuine admiration?

even you people can't believe that

 

[Robert W]

I guarantee that Trump 100% assumed the justices he appointed would give him absolute loyalty and is pissed as hell that they're not.

2 did side with Trump. Barrett did not.

 

[leftwinger]

This was a win for America. They can revamp, increase the Tarrifs. USSC thought they could hurt but instead? Thanks for the "clarification" traitorous swine.

WINNING!

 

[Rambunctious]

There is more than one way to skin a rabbit.....

 

[Robert W]

oh come on

so his entourage of sycophants he's appointed to high positions are just "true believers'" who support him based on genuine admiration?

even you people can't believe that

Barrett did not support Trump.

 

[Delldude]

Better tell the fat orange rapist.

He sure is down in the dumps. Did you see how he dimmed the lights in his press conference? He's like a child.

Nothing has changed.

 

[meaner gene]

I guarantee that Trump 100% assumed the justices he appointed would give him absolute loyalty and is pissed as hell that they're not.

2 did side with Trump. Barrett did not.

Count it again.

Donald Trump appointed three justices to the U.S. Supreme Court during his presidency: Neil Gorsuch (confirmed 2017 to replace Antonin Scalia), Brett Kavanaugh (confirmed 2018 to replace Anthony Kennedy), and Amy Coney Barrett (confirmed 2020 to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg). These appointments shifted the court to a 6-3 conservative majority.

2 out of 3 voted against Trump.

 

[braalian]

Barrett did not support Trump.

and, again, he fully expected her to in return for his patronage and was pissed as hell she didn't