- Banned
- #661
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why didn't Republicans include tariffs in their reconciliation Bills to cement the tariffs in?He still has other options
"he does have the authority in the "Constitution" do levy tariffs". Congress has enacted numerous laws granting the President tariff powers, often conditioned on investigations by agencies like the International Trade Commission (ITC) or Department of Commerce.
Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232)
Allows tariffs if imports threaten national security
Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301)
Targets unfair foreign trade practices (e.g., intellectual property theft).
Trade Act of 1974 (Section 122)
Addresses balance-of-payments deficits.
Tariff Act of 1930 (Section 33![]()
Counters foreign discrimination against U.S. commerce.
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA, e.g., 2015 version)
Facilitates trade agreements.
Ask them... the opinion just came out...So why didn't Republicans include tariffs in their reconciliation Bills to cement the tariffs in?
Yes, I am aware of the silly things cultists like you tell themselves to justify their own, poor behavior. And to prostrate themselves for the orange rape daddy.In translation:
Any SCOTUS judge who rules against my established worldview is not for to be on the bench.
Whatever you say.Yes, I am aware of the silly things cultists like you tell themselves to justify their own, poor behavior.
Doesn't matter to the mentally challenged Democrats.It's a narrower ruling than the TDS crowd is telling us.
Obviously from the reaction of Bessent, the alternatives were already in the pipeline.
All I'm saying is that isn't nearly the magnitude of a win the TDS set says it is, nor a loss as big as the panic button crowd is acting like.I can't change anything Trump said but my advice is to all of his fans, me too, talk about it like the 3 dissenting justices did.
Because they have pro trade bases to answer to. And they don't want to give ammo to their election opponents.So why didn't Republicans include tariffs in their reconciliation Bills to cement the tariffs in?
Well I will bow to your swollen chest, then.
GD...you people are stupid.the Supreme Court that's been largely stacked by trump himself?
You mean that Supreme Court?
Now I know you missed the point. Carry on.To compare a divesting loss at SCOTUS to lame ass card game is beyond ridculous.
Whatever you say.
Still missing the point...Your attempts at justification are lame. SCOTUS is NOT a card game. The Legislative Branch NOT the Executive Branch controls the purse, MAGA MAGGOTS need to remember that.
Whatever, Disturbed Nothing. I don't believe you.
Now go play in traffic, preferably on the interstate.
Notice Trump invoke the word 'landslide' several times during His presser today......Doesn't matter to the mentally challenged Democrats.
They still march around the 50 yard line like they won the Super Bowl.

The problem is that Kavanaugh and the other conservatives on the court have applied the major question doctrine over and over and over and over to the executive branch. That executive agencies need specific congressional authorization.Kavanaugh, he lays it all out. Trump followed the law. Congress has enacted numerous laws granting the President tariff powers
View attachment 1221430
View attachment 1221431
View attachment 1221432
Sure, and you are not gloating about Trump nor what Democrats say.All I'm saying is that isn't nearly the magnitude of a win the TDS set says it is, nor a loss as big as the panic button crowd is acting like.
A guy of Bessent's caliber doesn't just come out and say basically "yeah, so what?", if he doesn't have a Plan B & C.
Well, congress can write a new law and grant the president unlimited tariff authority. But the USSC has previously said that congress can't transfer any of their constitutional authority, except for conditions that are strictly defined and limited in scope.Ask them... the opinion just came out...