I must not understand the definition of sustainability.
You must not understand a whole lot about energy. Name one form of energy that will not use one of the the above four for the production of said energy.
Either way you understand sustainability and each of these four energies are proven sustainable into the future for thousands of years, stuff like windmills and solar panels need be replaced much more ofter than other type of power plant. Its the ignorant that believe in the sustainability of wind and solar, the ignorant never consider the tremendous amount of energy it takes to create the materials to build solar panels or windmills. its the ignorant who know nothing of how very limiting these Green energies are.
Boy, talk about ignorance. Even though we have just stated to tap the potential of wind on the Columbia River, for one hour on a windy day last month, the mills on the Colombia produced enough power for both Seattle and Portland. That means that all the things that we normally produce using power from other sources was now being powered by the mills, clean energy. That includes the plants producing solar panels.
Clean power producing clean power.
When the Internal Combustion engines were first being put into use, horse drawn wagons often delivered parts for them. Does that mean that we would always be dependent on horses?
For that is the flawed logic you are using. And most solar panels are gaurenteed for 20 years, and many that were produced longer ago than that are still in use. Windmills are good for about 20 years. Then you replace the turbine, take the old one and rebuild it. The post and foundation are still there. So much of the original investment will not have to be repeated.
Nuclear plants, coal plants, natural gas plants all have similiar times to either rebuilding or replacement.
Your a lousy liar, I saw the posts where another user ripped you apart for posting lies. Care to go down that route. Enough power for Seattle and Portland, pure lie, and considering you posted lies in the past, your lie here is just another lie. I will dig that post up if you care.
Energy that is sustainable, ha, windmills in the Cabazon pass on average produce power 20% of any day, so in one twenty four hour period wind is not sustainable.
Energy that is sustainable, solar cannot produce electricity more than six hour to eight hours a day, in a twenty four hour period solar is not sustainable. Further the tremendous amount of energy needed to produce solar panels can only come from fossil fuel, hence again, solar is not sustainable.
Old Crock, call me ignorant again and I guarantee I will dig up the post where Krotchdog pointed out you are nothing more than a liar, I will then post that post that proves you knowingly lied everywhere I see you post. So go ahead, show your ignorance.
Clean power producing clean power yet no mention of the materials needed and the pollution, this has been pointed out to you old crock so why lie, why lie repeatedly.
What was you did, you posted a fabricated data while you knew the data was fabricated because old crock thought all the users here are too stupid to figure out Old Crock is knowingly using false data.
This is why Liberal/Marxist will be defeated, sure some Liberals are actually intelligent but they all stick together, even when one is caught knowingly posting lies.
its sick that we have an entire political movement called environuts and liberals that are more than happy posting lies.
Enough power for portland and seattle is a pure lie. Even if you provide a source its still a lie, even if you show the experiement its a lie.
First off the windmills would have to be hooked up to a load, without a load all that tremendous power will have nowhere to go, without anywhere to go it literally will bounce back into the windmills and fry the generators. So where do you get a load as big as two cities when there exsits no such "dummy load".
Idiot
