Stupidest Piece I've Seen Today

[Billy_Kinetta]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

 

[OldLady]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

Thanks for the reminder that reasonable people still exist in the world. Hang out here and it's easy to forget.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

That guy has sand in his vagina.

 

[OldLady]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

That guy has sand in his vagina.

Why do gun threads immediately become anatomical?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

That guy has sand in his vagina.

Why do gun threads immediately become anatomical?

Ask the no-ball author of the article......

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

That's like saying free speech only applies if you speak or write in an 18th century manner.

What a bunch of fucking dumb-asses, liberals, they have to be the stupidest people on planet Earth.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

That guy has sand in his vagina.

Why do gun threads immediately become anatomical?

Because you people are such tools.

 

[koshergrl]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

That's like saying free speech only applies if you speak or write in an 18th century manner.

What a bunch of fucking dumb-asses, liberals, they have to be the stupidest people on planet Earth.

Truer words were never spoken.

 

[koshergrl]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

That guy has sand in his vagina.

Why do gun threads immediately become anatomical?

Because you people are such tools.

They really are.

And the more you deal with them, the more evident it becomes. Completely and utterly useless. They serve zero purpose in the world...they are truly as valueless as they envision the rest of humanity to be.

 

[OldLady]

Well, that was a refreshingly interesting discussion on the merits, as usual.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Well, that was a refreshingly interesting discussion on the merits, as usual.

The article lacked merit.

 

[OldLady]

Well, that was a refreshingly interesting discussion on the merits, as usual.

The article lacked merit.

My question didn't.
First response: vagina Second response: no-balls
All about guns and the Second Amendment.
Then the general name calling.
You're a bunch of idiots.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Well, that was a refreshingly interesting discussion on the merits, as usual.

The article lacked merit.

View attachment 92127
My question didn't.
First response: vagina Second response: no-balls
All about guns and the Second Amendment.
Then the general name calling.
You're a bunch of idiots.

Idiotic articles deserve no better.

 

[TNHarley]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

Thanks for the reminder that reasonable people still exist in the world. Hang out here and it's easy to forget.

You think that saying our BoR is only legit if we consider the timeline, is reasonable?
I think a better word would be desperation. Or ignorant. Perhaps even completely moronic. But reasonable?
Do you think free speech doesn't count if we text it? Or email it? OR flash lights on our cars to warn people of cops?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And this is why it doesnt....


Who was the moron who penned this crap?

 

[OldLady]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

Thanks for the reminder that reasonable people still exist in the world. Hang out here and it's easy to forget.

You think that saying our BoR is only legit if we consider the timeline, is reasonable?
I think a better word would be desperation. Or ignorant. Perhaps even completely moronic. But reasonable?
Do you think free speech doesn't count if we text it? Or email it? OR flash lights on our cars to warn people of cops?

It was tongue in cheek, TN. It had no serious intent. However, I tend to agree the Founding Fathers might rethink the 2nd Amendment if they could see the weaponry we allow to be amassed in the name of freedom, particularly since it is not necessary for a militia any longer.
I could be wrong; perhaps they were total revolutionaries who intentionally wanted an armed populace to overthrow the government. I kinda doubt it, though. Anyway, we'll never know unless a REALLY good psychic is able to contact Thomas Jefferson et al.
I do appreciate the question not involving body parts, however.

 

[Conservative65]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

Thanks for the reminder that reasonable people still exist in the world. Hang out here and it's easy to forget.

Another one that defines reasonable as agreeing with him/her.

 

[TNHarley]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

Thanks for the reminder that reasonable people still exist in the world. Hang out here and it's easy to forget.

You think that saying our BoR is only legit if we consider the timeline, is reasonable?
I think a better word would be desperation. Or ignorant. Perhaps even completely moronic. But reasonable?
Do you think free speech doesn't count if we text it? Or email it? OR flash lights on our cars to warn people of cops?

It was tongue in cheek, TN. It had no serious intent. However, I tend to agree the Founding Fathers might rethink the 2nd Amendment if they could see the weaponry we allow to be amassed in the name of freedom, particularly since it is not necessary for a militia any longer.
I could be wrong; perhaps they were total revolutionaries who intentionally wanted an armed populace to overthrow the government. I kinda doubt it, though. Anyway, we'll never know unless a REALLY good psychic is able to contact Thomas Jefferson et al.
I do appreciate the question not involving body parts, however.

Like these?
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787(do you think he would be ok with muskets fighting against missiles and 50cal machine guns?)
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
"On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
And FINALLY
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

 

[Conservative65]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

Thanks for the reminder that reasonable people still exist in the world. Hang out here and it's easy to forget.

You think that saying our BoR is only legit if we consider the timeline, is reasonable?
I think a better word would be desperation. Or ignorant. Perhaps even completely moronic. But reasonable?
Do you think free speech doesn't count if we text it? Or email it? OR flash lights on our cars to warn people of cops?

It was tongue in cheek, TN. It had no serious intent. However, I tend to agree the Founding Fathers might rethink the 2nd Amendment if they could see the weaponry we allow to be amassed in the name of freedom, particularly since it is not necessary for a militia any longer.
I could be wrong; perhaps they were total revolutionaries who intentionally wanted an armed populace to overthrow the government. I kinda doubt it, though. Anyway, we'll never know unless a REALLY good psychic is able to contact Thomas Jefferson et al.
I do appreciate the question not involving body parts, however.

You are wrong and history supports that. They were revolutionaries that intentionally overthrew the government. If you doubt that's what they were, try reading history and one does not have to be a psychic to do so.

 

[Conservative65]

I'm sure Hillary applauds.

Why the 2nd Amendment Applies Only to Your Muskets and Dueling Pistols

Thanks for the reminder that reasonable people still exist in the world. Hang out here and it's easy to forget.

You think that saying our BoR is only legit if we consider the timeline, is reasonable?
I think a better word would be desperation. Or ignorant. Perhaps even completely moronic. But reasonable?
Do you think free speech doesn't count if we text it? Or email it? OR flash lights on our cars to warn people of cops?

It was tongue in cheek, TN. It had no serious intent. However, I tend to agree the Founding Fathers might rethink the 2nd Amendment if they could see the weaponry we allow to be amassed in the name of freedom, particularly since it is not necessary for a militia any longer.
I could be wrong; perhaps they were total revolutionaries who intentionally wanted an armed populace to overthrow the government. I kinda doubt it, though. Anyway, we'll never know unless a REALLY good psychic is able to contact Thomas Jefferson et al.
I do appreciate the question not involving body parts, however.

Like these?
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787(do you think he would be ok with muskets fighting against missiles and 50cal machine guns?)
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
"On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
And FINALLY
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

Just based on the fact that the founding fathers did overthrow the government under which they lived proves that they were "total revolutionaries that intentionally wanted an armed populace to overthrow the government". OldLady says she could be wrong. She is as evidenced by the fact that they used an armed populace to over throw the government.