How so?Like most of your posts, that is incorrect.
Doesn’t all electricity get converted into heat eventually?
Is electricity from solar power different from electricity from fossil fuels?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How so?Like most of your posts, that is incorrect.
Yes.Is there some referndum on climate legislation going on?
Didn’t you read the paper?
They used satellites.![]()
The lower albedo of the panels resulted in solar radiation being converted into electricity.
Yes, heat is the great Sink. But as we all know, the wee ball of electrons produced through alternative technologies have a slight greenish tinge commensurate with their correlation with left-wing causes.How so?
Doesn’t all electricity get converted into heat eventually?
Is electricity from solar power different from electricity from fossil fuels?
Yes.How so? Doesn’t all electricity get converted into heat eventually?
Is electricity from solar power different from electricity from fossil fuels?
So if all electricity eventually is converted into heat, replacing generating sources which don’t convert solar radiation into electricity with generating sources which do convert solar radiation into electricity will result in an incremental cooling relative to generating sources which don’t convert solar radiation into electricity.Yes, heat is the great Sink. But as we all know, the wee ball of electrons produced through alternative technologies have a slight greenish tinge commensurate with their correlation with left-wing causes.
We aren’t discussing GHG, dummy. That’s a separate topic.Yes.
Electricity from Nuclear or Solar/Wind doesn't add to the GHG Blanket.
Not a tough one.
Just another of you shorty contentLess trolling idiot riddles.
`
The greater the efficiency the greater the cooling effect. As any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation which doesn’t directly warm the surface of the planet.At what efficiency?
That is the subject of a different study which modeled a regional cooling effect. I shared that paper with you too.And what change did they measure outside the farms?
The greater the efficiency the greater the cooling effect. As any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation which doesn’t directly warm the surface of the planet.
That is the subject of a different study which modeled a regional cooling effect. I shared that paper with you too.![]()
Actually my statement was the best way to usher in the next glacial cycle is widespread use of solar.Your global cooling claim was wrong. I get it.
Again, relative to sources that don’t convert solar radiation into electricity there is.The greater the efficiency the greater the cooling effect.
Electricity is converted to heat. There is no net cooling effect.
And the lower albedo means net warming.
Actually my statement was the best way to usher in the next glacial cycle is widespread use of solar.
Again, relative to sources that don’t convert solar radiation into electricity there is.
All it takes to trigger a negative albedo feedback is a bad winter followed by a mild summer.
Only because you don't understand the INCREMENTAL impact of switching electrical generation sources from fossil fuels to solar.Yes. And I've been laughing at your claim ever since.
It was always my claim. You confused my claim with my skepticism that heat returned from electricity usage has the exact same impact on GHG molecules as heat from solar radiation warming the surface of the planet.That wasn't part of your original claim.
Why are you moving the goalposts?
That low albedo of solar panels is how solar radiation is converted into electricity, so no. If you were right daytime and upward longwave radiation would be unchanged by the presence of solar farms and that has been proven to not be the case.Less likely to happen with widespread, very low albedo solar panels cluttering up the world.