Solar Stocks are Soaring as Oil price Spike furthers Bets on Pivot to Renewable Energy

That low albedo of solar panels is how solar radiation is converted into electricity, so no. If you were right daytime and upward longwave radiation would be unchanged by the presence of solar farms and that has been proven to not be the case.

View attachment 626492


That low albedo of solar panels is how solar radiation is converted into electricity

And the reason why solar panels are net warming the planet.
 
Oops, another fool. We're talking about investment in the industry. Try to keep up. We can't spend all the time in class on the slow kids. One of the items that is being discussed is how to make it more economical. So when you are done bleeding from your wherever, maybe try to add an on topic thought.
well when it's not, you ignore it. Now isn't that special?
 
But enough about you.
Says the guy who think solar power causes warming.

 
Says the guy who think solar power causes warming.


Solar panels, because of their lower albedo, absorb more/reflect less energy from the Sun.

Thanks for the link.

We find that solar panels alone induce regional cooling by converting incoming solar energy to electricity in comparison to the climate without solar panels. The conversion of this electricity to heat, primarily in urban areas, increases regional and global temperatures which compensate the cooling effect.

Increases global temperatures? LOL!
 
Solar panels, because of their lower albedo, absorb more/reflect less energy from the Sun.

Thanks for the link.

We find that solar panels alone induce regional cooling by converting incoming solar energy to electricity in comparison to the climate without solar panels. The conversion of this electricity to heat, primarily in urban areas, increases regional and global temperatures which compensate the cooling effect.

Increases global temperatures? LOL!
Which happens regardless of the source so switching to a source that captures and converts solar radiation into electricity from a source that doesn't results in an incremental cooling.
 
That's why they warm the Earth.
That's not what the satellites which measured upward long-wave radiation found. Those measurements found the exact opposite.

1649253084141.png



https://www.researchgate.net/public...farm_deployment_on_surface_longwave_radiation
 
How much additional heating at the point of usage in the urban areas?
The exact same amount from generating sources which do not reduce upward long-wave radiation. It's the same in all cases but only solar reduces incoming solar radiation by converting solar radiation into electricity. :)
 
You mean the same heating provided for by sources that don't capture solar radiation to generate electricity?

Do you even incremental analysis :dunno:

I already told you how you needed to say it if you're going to move the goal posts.

"The best way to usher in the next glacial cycle is to stop using fossil fuels"
 
The exact same amount from generating sources which do not reduce upward long-wave radiation. It's the same in all cases but only solar reduces incoming solar radiation by converting solar radiation into electricity. :)

Just admit it, solar power doesn't result in cooling.
 
I already told you how you needed to say it if you're going to move the goal posts.

"The best way to usher in the next glacial cycle is to stop using fossil fuels"
The goal posts haven't moved. That you need to say they moved just proves you know you have lost.

Again... The heat from electricity usage is the same for ALL generating sources but only solar reduces incoming solar radiation by converting solar radiation into electricity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top