Sodomite Suppression Act of California

Penal Code section 39 a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

...the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008 (Sodomy).pdf

Filed by a bona fide lawyer of Sodom California.

It will be interesting to see how many signatures this American Taliban whackjob guy gets on his ballot initiative.
The American Taliban at work.
It certainly could be the work of ISIS, couldn't it?
 
The Reader said:
Can Deceit, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant, be presented in other ways?

Of course, another example of such, is demonstrated in the follow drivel:

There is no such limited definition of marriage. Marriage under the law can be defined as anything the People say it is.

Nature designed he human species, wherein two distinct and complimenting genders provide for the established Human Physiological Standard... and it is in that standard that Marriage is DEFINED.

Understand, that the above noted deceit claiming that Marriage can be defined to mean anything to anyone, is being advanced by the same people who can find no potential for harm in advancing deceit as truth.

What they're telling you in that behavior is "There is no such limited definition of ______." Fill in the blank with "Truth", Trust, Morality and 'the potential for harm' becomes readily apparent, as there is no potential for 'individual and cultural viability' absent those words being readily understood by everyone who reads or hears them... this 'such limited definition' is critical to NOT IMPARTING HARM.

See the problem?
 
Last edited:
The Reader said:
Can Deceit, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant, be presented in other ways?

Of course, another example of such, is demonstrated in the follow drivel:

There is no such limited definition of marriage. Marriage under the law can be defined as anything the People say it is.

Nature designed he human species, wherein two distinct and complimenting genders provide for the human physiological standard... and it is in that standard that Marriage is DEFINED.

Understand, that the above deceit, s being advanced by the same people who can find no potential for harm in advancing deceit as truth.

See the problem?
Marriage is a human construct. It is what humans make it because it is a human construct. Sorry that you don't get that. Maybe in a few years you'll be able to grow to understand higher level thinking.
 
The Reader said:
Can Deceit, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant, be presented in other ways?

Of course, another example of such, is demonstrated in the follow drivel:

There is no such limited definition of marriage. Marriage under the law can be defined as anything the People say it is.

Nature designed he human species, wherein two distinct and complimenting genders provide for the human physiological standard... and it is in that standard that Marriage is DEFINED.

Understand, that the above deceit, s being advanced by the same people who can find no potential for harm in advancing deceit as truth.

See the problem?
Marriage is a human construct. It is what humans make it because it is a human construct. Sorry that you don't get that. Maybe in a few years you'll be able to grow to understand higher level thinking.
Yes, and has gone through many incarnations, including the wife or wives being property.
 
There is nothing deceitful in same sex relationships.

'Same sex', is deviant, abnormal sex, which presents from mental disorder; a perversion of human reasoning.

The deceit is manifest through the declaration that same sex is normal sex, the result of sound reason, thus is sustainable behavior and it is through that deceit, that harm results, to the individual who has succumbed to mental disorder and those who they live among; being mislead, fraudulently influenced; believing that what is false is truth, consequently basing any number of decisions on falsity... forced to suffer the subsequent unenviable consequences.

The Catholic Church is a classic example... wherein they 'believed' that Homosexual Candidates for the priesthood were not mentally disordered, coming to accept such candidates for decades, resulting in the sexual molestation of tens of thousands of children, by sexually abnormal individuals who had assured and advised the Church that they were worthy of trust.

See how that works?
 
Last edited:
Penal Code section 39 a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

...the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008 (Sodomy).pdf

Filed by a bona fide lawyer of Sodom California.

It will be interesting to see how many signatures this American Taliban whackjob guy gets on his ballot initiative.

Well...to start with, this needs 350,000 valid signatures and to "finish" it, the death penalty was declared unconstitutional in CA.
 
Penal Code section 39 a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

...the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008 (Sodomy).pdf

Filed by a bona fide lawyer of Sodom California.

It will be interesting to see how many signatures this American Taliban whackjob guy gets on his ballot initiative.

Well...to start with, this needs 350,000 valid signatures and to "finish" it, the death penalty was declared unconstitutional in CA.

LOL! So what?

This is a fund raising scam set out to inspire pant wetting of the Sexually Abnormal.

But it is ADORABLE that our own in-house cranks ran to bite down HARD!

ROFL! I personally can't get my fill of it.

The coolest part of it is how it literally describes the inevitable end of the Homo-Spring, as such is how every such spring has ended, throughout human history.

(Reader, there is a reason that Homosexuals were in the Closet. And that reason is that, THAT IS WHERE HUMANITY PUT THEM and humanity put them there FOR A REASON!

Now you may ask: "What is the reason that humanity put the sexually abnormal in the closet?" Which is a great question. The reason humanity put them there is: TO KEEP THEM FROM DOING WHAT THEY'RE DOING RIGHT NOW... which is what they're done, EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY'VE BEEN ALLOWED OUTSIDE THE CLOSET... "Truth is falsity and Falsity is truth!"

When enough people come to believe that... whatever culture that is: IS GONE!
 
When enough people come to believe that... whatever culture that is: IS GONE!

when RW's stop trying to run other peoples lives, and run their own they are gone..
 
When enough people come to believe that... whatever culture that is: IS GONE!

when RW's stop trying to run other peoples lives, and run their own they are gone..

Well, you should know, there is no right to perpetuate perverse reasoning. And that is because their is no potential for a right to injure the means of another to exercise their own rights and perverse reasoning, does just that.

See how that works?
 
Penal Code section 39 a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

...the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008 (Sodomy).pdf

Filed by a bona fide lawyer of Sodom California.

It will be interesting to see how many signatures this American Taliban whackjob guy gets on his ballot initiative.
One must admire his values if not his penalties.
Actually not.

His 'values' are anathema to the fundamental tenets of individual liberty safeguarded by the Constitution.
 
...Some of us are patiently waiting for you to tell us what harm homosexuals do to society that heterosexuals don't do, that warrants discriminating against them.
Ummmmm... they are perverse, unnatural, unclean and degenerate abominations in the eyes of God and Man (and the Law, too, in more traditional environments), and most decent folk don't want them contaminating and infecting and infesting society any more than they already have? Just a guess. The specifics really don't matter a damn. Eeeewww...
52_52.gif
 
Last edited:
Penal Code section 39 a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

...the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008 (Sodomy).pdf

Filed by a bona fide lawyer of Sodom California.

It will be interesting to see how many signatures this American Taliban whackjob guy gets on his ballot initiative.
One must admire his values if not his penalties.
Actually not.

His 'values' are anathema to the fundamental tenets of individual liberty safeguarded by the Constitution.
The US Constitution is not a suicide pact.

It allows us to censure a great many kinds of 'undesirables', perverts and freaks.

We've just lost our way for a little while, in connection with one of those sub-categories.

We'll get it sorted, sooner or later.
 
...Some of us are patiently waiting for you to tell us what harm homosexuals do to society that heterosexuals don't do, that warrants discriminating against them.
Ummmmm... they are perverse, unnatural, unclean and degenerate abominations in the eyes of God and Man (and the Law, too, in more traditional environments), and most decent folk don't want them contaminating and infecting and infesting society any more than they already have? Just a guess. The specifics really don't matter a damn. Eeeewww...
52_52.gif

That's what you people are now reduced to.
 
Penal Code section 39 a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

...the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008 (Sodomy).pdf

Filed by a bona fide lawyer of Sodom California.

It will be interesting to see how many signatures this American Taliban whackjob guy gets on his ballot initiative.
One must admire his values if not his penalties.
Actually not.

His 'values' are anathema to the fundamental tenets of individual liberty safeguarded by the Constitution.
The US Constitution is not a suicide pact.

It allows us to censure a great many kinds of 'undesirables', perverts and freaks.

We've just lost our way for a little while, in connection with one of those sub-categories.

We'll get it sorted, sooner or later.

Then get your conservative goons in politics to propose legislation to outlaw homosexual sex outright.
 
Penal Code section 39 a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

...the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008 (Sodomy).pdf

Filed by a bona fide lawyer of Sodom California.

It will be interesting to see how many signatures this American Taliban whackjob guy gets on his ballot initiative.
One must admire his values if not his penalties.
Actually not.

His 'values' are anathema to the fundamental tenets of individual liberty safeguarded by the Constitution.
The US Constitution is not a suicide pact.

It allows us to censure a great many kinds of 'undesirables', perverts and freaks.

We've just lost our way for a little while, in connection with one of those sub-categories.

We'll get it sorted, sooner or later.
Gee...where have we heard that before? :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still waiting.

I'll help you. Tell us what harm to society two men or two women do if they legally marry in a jurisdiction where such a marriage is legal.

PLEASE be clear, concise, and specific.

Let's review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Questions?

Yes. Where's your FIRST example of how same sex marriage harms society?

OH! Good question...

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman. Therefore society is harmed where two men are said to be suitable for something which is by definition, unsuited for them. Because it is deceit, being advanced as truth... which is axiomatically harmful, because it DECEIVES... which is to say it intentionally misinforms, misguides, defrauds and as such robs the individual and by extension, the culture... of truth, thus is a delusion which can only result in chaos, calamity and catastrophe... which is the product common to evil.

]

You have to answer the question without your baseless subjective immaterial bias injected into the answer.

So again. What is your first example of how same sex marriage harms society?
Because it violates society's fundamental and enduring definition of the basic building block of its own stability.
 
Still waiting.

I'll help you. Tell us what harm to society two men or two women do if they legally marry in a jurisdiction where such a marriage is legal.

PLEASE be clear, concise, and specific.

Let's review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Questions?

Yes. Where's your FIRST example of how same sex marriage harms society?

OH! Good question...

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman. Therefore society is harmed where two men are said to be suitable for something which is by definition, unsuited for them. Because it is deceit, being advanced as truth... which is axiomatically harmful, because it DECEIVES... which is to say it intentionally misinforms, misguides, defrauds and as such robs the individual and by extension, the culture... of truth, thus is a delusion which can only result in chaos, calamity and catastrophe... which is the product common to evil.

]

You have to answer the question without your baseless subjective immaterial bias injected into the answer.

So again. What is your first example of how same sex marriage harms society?
Because it violates society's fundamental and enduring definition of the basic building block of its own stability.

Good luck getting that one to hold up in court. Vague platitudes will not win. The anti gay bigots cannot demonstrate a societal harm. This is why you are losing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top