The Reader said:
Can Deceit, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant, be presented in other ways?
Of course, another example of such, is demonstrated in the follow drivel:
There is no such limited definition of marriage. Marriage under the law can be defined as anything the People say it is.
Nature designed he human species, wherein two distinct and complimenting genders provide for the human physiological standard... and it is in that standard that Marriage is DEFINED.
Understand, that the above deceit, s being advanced by the same people who can find no potential for harm in advancing deceit as truth.
See the problem?