Sodomite Suppression Act of California

[g5000]

I am in agreement with the half of his proposition that agrees with 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings with respect to homosexuality.

That is what the writer of the proposed measure is also in agreement with. That is why he is calling for their execution. Because that is what Leviticus says to do.

 

[Kondor3]

...Okay- so you are only half in agreement with the nut who wants to be able to shoot homosexuals. Thanks for the clarification.

Correct.

I am in agreement with the half of his proposition that agrees with 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings with respect to homosexuality.

I am not in agreement with the half of his proposition calling for the summary execution of those found to be thus afflicted.

hmmmm you do know that 'judeo Christian teaching with respect to homosexuality call for execution of homosexuals- right?

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

The New Testament trumps the Old.

I don't recall Jesus of Nazareth calling for homosexuals to be put to death.

 

[g5000]

The writer of the proposed law starts out calling homosexuality "The abominable crime".

That is exactly what homosexuality is called in Leviticus. An "abomination".

 

[Kondor3]

I am in agreement with the half of his proposition that agrees with 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings with respect to homosexuality.

That is what the writer of the proposed measure is also in agreement with. That is why he is calling for their execution. Because that is what Leviticus says to do.

The New Testament trumps the Old.

I do not recall Jesus of Nazareth teaching that homosexuals must be put to death.

 

[g5000]

...Okay- so you are only half in agreement with the nut who wants to be able to shoot homosexuals. Thanks for the clarification.

Correct.

I am in agreement with the half of his proposition that agrees with 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings with respect to homosexuality.

I am not in agreement with the half of his proposition calling for the summary execution of those found to be thus afflicted.

hmmmm you do know that 'judeo Christian teaching with respect to homosexuality call for execution of homosexuals- right?

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

The New Testament trumps the Old.

Not in Judaism, it doesn't. And you said "Judeo-Christian teachings".

 

[Kondor3]

The writer of the proposed law starts out calling homosexuality "The abominable crime".

That is exactly what homosexuality is called in Leviticus. An "abomination".

They share some concept and verbiage between them. MEH.

 

[Kondor3]

...Okay- so you are only half in agreement with the nut who wants to be able to shoot homosexuals. Thanks for the clarification.

Correct.

I am in agreement with the half of his proposition that agrees with 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings with respect to homosexuality.

I am not in agreement with the half of his proposition calling for the summary execution of those found to be thus afflicted.

hmmmm you do know that 'judeo Christian teaching with respect to homosexuality call for execution of homosexuals- right?

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

The New Testament trumps the Old.

Not in Judaism, it doesn't. And you said "Judeo-Christian teachings".

Majority rules.

And, in the minds of the majority, the New trumps the Old.

Otherwise, we'd still be roasting perverts in modern times.

 

[Syriusly]

...Okay- so you are only half in agreement with the nut who wants to be able to shoot homosexuals. Thanks for the clarification.

Correct.

I am in agreement with the half of his proposition that agrees with 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings with respect to homosexuality.

I am not in agreement with the half of his proposition calling for the summary execution of those found to be thus afflicted.

hmmmm you do know that 'judeo Christian teaching with respect to homosexuality call for execution of homosexuals- right?

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

The New Testament trumps the Old.

I don't recall Jesus of Nazareth calling for homosexuals to be put to death.

I don't recall Jesus of Nazareth condemning homosexuals.

 

[g5000]

“Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Corinthians 6:9–10)

Any fornicators, adulterers, thieves, covetous people, or drunkards here? You are lumped in with the homos.

And don't forget how the bible defines adulterers. It isn't just married people who physically cheat on their wives.

If you have a porn collection, you qualify.

And remember what we are told in Matthew 7:2.

 

[g5000]

"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."

 

[Kondor3]

...Okay- so you are only half in agreement with the nut who wants to be able to shoot homosexuals. Thanks for the clarification.

Correct.

I am in agreement with the half of his proposition that agrees with 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings with respect to homosexuality.

I am not in agreement with the half of his proposition calling for the summary execution of those found to be thus afflicted.

hmmmm you do know that 'judeo Christian teaching with respect to homosexuality call for execution of homosexuals- right?

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

The New Testament trumps the Old.

I don't recall Jesus of Nazareth calling for homosexuals to be put to death.

I don't recall Jesus of Nazareth condemning homosexuals.

Quite true.

 

[Seawytch]

I don't recall Jesus of Nazareth condemning homosexuals.

He did say this though...

“Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.” (Matthew 19:11-12)

 

[Kondor3]

I don't recall Jesus of Nazareth condemning homosexuals.

He did say this though...

“Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.” (Matthew 19:11-12)

Non sequitur?

 

[Seawytch]

I don't recall Jesus of Nazareth condemning homosexuals.

He did say this though...

“Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.” (Matthew 19:11-12)

Non sequitur?

Depends on who is translating or interpreting.

 

[hazlnut]

California AG May Be Forced To Put Up With Extremist's 'Kill All Gays' Drive

This is very simple. The homophobic puke lawyer, Matt McLaughlin, is human fecal matter and should be locked up as criminally insane.

This is where I draw the line on "liberalism" and "rights" -- a decent society should not have to put up with vile piece of shit like McLaughlin and the Westboro baptists. No, I'm not worried about a slippery slope if we start limiting the rights of shitty vile human beings.

The legal standard would be very reasonable and clear -- does your free speech reek of shit? if so, it's banned.

A ballot initiative devised by a California lawyer that calls for the execution of gay people appears destined to make it past the state attorney general's desk, according to several legal experts.

"The Sodomite Suppression Act" is the brainchild of Orange County attorney Matt McLaughlin, and aside from legalizing the state killing of homosexuals, it would also outlaw preaching gay rights to minors, the San Fransisco Chronicle reported on Thursday.

The measure would require killing anyone who has engaged in homosexual activity via “bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.”

For added convenience, the initiative proposes that any citizen can act as an executioner if the state fails to carry out its duties.

If you post anything but total agreement that McLaughin is a total piece of shit.... well, nuff said.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Tough. Unless speech threatens imminent violence or is libelous, you can't do a thing about it.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Your right to speak freely, is sustained ONLY through your RESPONSIBILITY to SPEAK THE TRUTH.

The Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality exists ENTIRELY UP DECEIT.

There is NO RIGHT TO DECEIVE.

Now, if you doubt that, then continue to cry about the growing antipathy for the sexually abnormal.

There's a reason you idiots have spent 99.999999~% of human history in the closet... what you're too stupid to understand, is WHY.

Now because I am just naturally kind to idiots... I'll offer you a clue: It ain't us.

 

[g5000]

Sodomite Suppression Act of California US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Preacher]

AWESOME! Dude is a hero.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

There is a big difference between the ballot measure getting past the AG and it actually getting it on the ballot, which is staggeringly unlikely to happen.