Socialism Gets Tested

[paddymurphy]

We see what SOCIALISM has done, and IS DOING to America.... dragging us down into the third world! Look to the Manchurian muslim's agenda's and policies!

I know, I rather suspect the idiot socialists are going to oversee their own destruction via criminal alien and violent muslim invasion. It's the only positive thing about them turning the us into a shithole.

The useful idiots are always the first ones rounded up and eliminated

No, you moron, the useful idiots would not be rounded up. They would be allowed to remain free cause they are useful. You dumb fucks cannot even get your digs at others straight.

 

[Skylar]

Nah, I've just seen you cry 'Soros' at the drop of a hat, regardless of topic, poster or thread. Soros lives in your head rent free. And you try and splatter your personal obsession on anyone who doesn't ape whatever useless drivel you try to pass off as 'facts'.

Not the drop of a hat, the drop of a meme.

With that 'meme' apparently being anything that doesn't ape exactly what you believe. As you've splattered 10 full pages of your Soros obsessed batshit on this board,

Search Results for Query Soros US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Those 10 pages of raving, panty shitting hysterics are all you.

Skylar, you're stupid as a dog turd - but less useful.

And yet I've sent you running. Notice how you've been run off your entire Obamcare argument. You've abandoned all your useless idiocy regarding socialism and communism. And you won't touch Chic's debunked drivel about how socialists are the same as communists are the same as democrats.

Is there any claim I can't run you off of, boy?

Regulation - N: a law, rule, or other order prescribed by authority, especially to regulate conduct.

Now what do you think you have shown, retard?

That the definition cited above doesn't match this silly nonsense you pulled out of your ass. Remember this rhetorical turd?

Regulation is the prohibition of potential tortuous behavior. Control is mandatory engagement of acts.

Post 89
Socialism Gets Tested Page 9 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Now tell us, dipshit.....where does the actual definition of regulation mention of any of the hapless idiocy that you used to define the term? As I said, regulation involves mandatory components as well. You insist it only involves 'tortuous' behavior, not mandatory engagement of acts.

Yet the actual definition makes no mention of 'tortuous acts', while it does cite authority, rules, and regulated conduct. Sounds pretty mandatory to me.

Remember, words have actual meanings. And you making up your own isn't an argument. Its an excuse for one. Regulation isn't ownership. Nor does Obamacare control 'every aspect of healthcare'. Even your own sources cite insurers and what is covered by them.

Which might explain why you've fled from your rhetorical skid marks.

You keep running, I'll keep laughing.....deal?

 

[paddymurphy]

There is a difference, you fucking moron, between a communist nation and a socialist one. There is a difference between communism, socialism and an economy with a mix of capitalism and socialism. There is no bright line. You think this country is socialist. By that measure, every successful nation in the world today is socialist. The reality is that such labels are for stupid people. Having social welfare programs does not make a nation socialist. Most of our GDP is from private economic activity.

Paddy, I've made no secret of my contempt for you - because you are quite stupid and mindlessly recite talking points from the hate sites.

Please explain what in your alleged mind, are the differentiating features between capitalism, socialism, and communism?

Have you ever heard of a 19th century book called "Capital?" Do you have any clue why it would be pertinent to this discussion?

You have contempt for the truth and for your betters, those who understand these concepts far better than your feeble mind can even begin to grasp. Your GED has not prepared you to be able to discuss these topics. Nearly every nation in Western Europe, North America, and Australia and New Zealand, as well as many aroung the world are capitalist nations with social welfare programs and regulations that dumb fucks like you equate to socialism. Most of the economic output in these nations is from privately owned business and entities. The government does not own the means of production. Though these companies operate according to governmental regulations, those regulations do not equate to government ownership or even control of their operations. Requiring a car maker to meet certain safety and fuel consumption regulations does not mean the government has taken over or controls the car maker. They still operate on a capitalist basis; they are owned by investors looking for a return on the investment; they are run by folks chosen by the owners of the companies; they make and sell products on the free market and return profit to the investors. All for profit companies do so. They produce most of the wealth in and income in the world. How you could be so fucking stupid as to suggest that America under Obama has moved closer to socialism when there is more economic inequality is beyond me. Providing basic necessities of life, food, shelter, access to health care, on a temporary basis to those who are unable to provide for themselves is not socialism. Taking a tiny bit from the the rest of to provide this pittance to poor people is not socialist redistribution of wealth. Health care reform did not redistribute wealth from rich or middle class to poor; it changed the means of delivering health care to the poor in a way that has slowed the growth of health care costs for everyone. The wealth is redistributed from one group of taxpayers to another group, those who work in the health care industry. Of course, your 12 grade GED brain will not allow you to understand any of this.

 

[Uncensored2008]

With that 'meme' apparently being anything that doesn't ape exactly what you believe. As you've splattered 10 full pages of your Soros obsessed batshit on this board,

Search Results for Query Soros US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Those 10 pages of raving, panty shitting hysterics are all you.

Soros runs a dozen hate sites, which USMB leftists us to do their thinking for them,

And yet I've sent you running.

Notice how you've been run off your entire Obamcare argument. You've abandoned all your useless idiocy regarding socialism and communism. And you won't touch Chic's debunked drivel about how socialists are the same as communists are the same as democrats.

Oh, I see that sploogy...

Is there any claim I can't run you off of, boy?

The question is, can you ever say anything even remotely intelligent?

That the definition cited above doesn't match this silly nonsense you pulled out of your ass. Remember this rhetorical turd?

Regulation is the prohibition of potential tortuous behavior. Control is mandatory engagement of acts.

Post 89
Socialism Gets Tested Page 9 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

That's right, shitfer brains.

Contemplate it for awhile - maybe you'll grasp it?

Now tell us, dipshit.....where does the actual definition of regulation mention of any of the hapless idiocy that you used to define the term? As I said, regulation involves mandatory components as well. You insist it only involves 'tortuous' behavior, not mandatory engagement of acts.

Yet the actual definition makes no mention of 'tortuous acts', while it does cite authority, rules, and regulated conduct. Sounds pretty mandatory to me.

Does it hurt to be that stupid? I mean, actual, physical pain?

Remember, words have actual meanings.

Yet you lack the intellect requisite to grasp such meanings.

You are a fool thinking that your childish ad hom makes you appear to be holding your own.

And you making up your own isn't an argument. Its an excuse for one. Regulation isn't ownership. Nor does Obamacare control 'every aspect of healthcare'. Even your own sources cite insurers and what is covered by them.

Which might explain why you've fled from your rhetorical skid marks.

I'll put it simply for you, retard. Obama's fascist care is a centrally planned and managed approach to health care.

Ideas are something you have no familiarity with, so you'll spew more shit from a talking points list. rather than deal with the subject.

Hey, you're stupid - it's all you've got..

You keep running, I'll keep laughing.....deal?

The problem is, you're boring. Poking you with a stick was amusing for awhile - but you're far too stupid to provide entertainment for long...

 

[Skylar]

With that 'meme' apparently being anything that doesn't ape exactly what you believe. As you've splattered 10 full pages of your Soros obsessed batshit on this board,

Search Results for Query Soros US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Those 10 pages of raving, panty shitting hysterics are all you.

Soros runs a dozen hate sites, which USMB leftists us to do their thinking for them,

The only citing Soros....is you. The man is your personal obsession. You can't stop talking about him. We never mention the guy.

And we have 10 panty shitting pages where you accuse anyone who doesn't ape exactly what you believe as somehow being associated with Soros.

The man has set up residence inside your head. And lives there rent free.

And yet I've sent you running.

Notice how you've been run off your entire Obamcare argument. You've abandoned all your useless idiocy regarding socialism and communism. And you won't touch Chic's debunked drivel about how socialists are the same as communists are the same as democrats.

Oh, I see that sploogy...

Keep that tail tucked snuggly between those quivering haunches, boy. You've abandoned your every Obamacare argument, all your useless idiocy about 'regulation', run from all of Chic's stupidity about 'socialists and communists and democrats being the same'.

That was easy!

Is there any claim I can't run you off of, boy?

The question is, can you ever say anything even remotely intelligent?

That the definition cited above doesn't match this silly nonsense you pulled out of your ass. Remember this rhetorical turd?

Regulation is the prohibition of potential tortuous behavior. Control is mandatory engagement of acts.

Post 89
Socialism Gets Tested Page 9 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

That's right, shitfer brains.

Contemplate it for awhile - maybe you'll grasp it?

Now tell us, dipshit.....where does the actual definition of regulation mention of any of the hapless idiocy that you used to define the term? As I said, regulation involves mandatory components as well. You insist it only involves 'tortuous' behavior, not mandatory engagement of acts.

Yet the actual definition makes no mention of 'tortuous acts', while it does cite authority, rules, and regulated conduct. Sounds pretty mandatory to me.

Does it hurt to be that stupid? I mean, actual, physical pain?

Remember, words have actual meanings.

Yet you lack the intellect requisite to grasp such meanings.

You are a fool thinking that your childish ad hom makes you appear to be holding your own.

And you making up your own isn't an argument. Its an excuse for one. Regulation isn't ownership. Nor does Obamacare control 'every aspect of healthcare'. Even your own sources cite insurers and what is covered by them.

Which might explain why you've fled from your rhetorical skid marks.

I'll put it simply for you, retard. Obama's fascist care is a centrally planned and managed approach to health care.

Ideas are something you have no familiarity with, so you'll spew more shit from a talking points list. rather than deal with the subject.

Hey, you're stupid - it's all you've got..

You keep running, I'll keep laughing.....deal?

The problem is, you're boring. Poking you with a stick was amusing for awhile - but you're far too stupid to provide entertainment for long...

And exactly as predicted.....you continue to run. You don't even try to polish your little turd of an argument abandoning it completely. With even you tossing your made up definition of 'regulation' onto the rhetorical midden heap, you can understand why we treat your imagination like the shit that it is.

Remember that next time you try and make up definitions.

 

[koshergrl]

There is a difference, you fucking moron, between a communist nation and a socialist one. There is a difference between communism, socialism and an economy with a mix of capitalism and socialism. There is no bright line. You think this country is socialist. By that measure, every successful nation in the world today is socialist. The reality is that such labels are for stupid people. Having social welfare programs does not make a nation socialist. Most of our GDP is from private economic activity.

Paddy, I've made no secret of my contempt for you - because you are quite stupid and mindlessly recite talking points from the hate sites.

Please explain what in your alleged mind, are the differentiating features between capitalism, socialism, and communism?

Have you ever heard of a 19th century book called "Capital?" Do you have any clue why it would be pertinent to this discussion?

You have contempt for the truth and for your betters....

So you believe that some people are better than others. How un-socialist of you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sentences, paragraphs, and grammar oh my...

You have contempt for the truth and for your betters, those who understand these concepts far better than your feeble mind can even begin to grasp.

Of course; and your educational prowess is well exhibited through your well constructed posts, with articulation and adherence to the rules of grammar and logic....

Your GED has not prepared you to be able to discuss these topics.

Well, not everyone can match the erudite presentation of ideas that you offer. In fact few outside of a skid row gutter, clutching a bottle of Thunderbird, even come close.

Nearly every nation in Western Europe, North America, and Australia and New Zealand, as well as many aroung the world are capitalist nations with social welfare programs and regulations that dumb fucks like you equate to socialism.

It appears that you lack rudimentary reading comprehension skills. No real surprise.

I've explained on many occasions that the welfare state is not socialism. As the drooling retard Skyler cannot grasp, socialism requires the control of the means of production by the state. Merely engaging in transfer payments falls far short of the command and control structures used by central planners to manage an economy.

Most of the economic output in these nations is from privately owned business and entities. The government does not own the means of production. Though these companies operate according to governmental regulations, those regulations do not equate to government ownership or even control of their operations. Requiring a car maker to meet certain safety and fuel consumption regulations does not mean the government has taken over or controls the car maker. They still operate on a capitalist basis; they are owned by investors looking for a return on the investment; they are run by folks chosen by the owners of the companies; they make and sell products on the free market and return profit to the investors. All for profit companies do so. They produce most of the wealth in and income in the world.

Did you imagine that you had a point to make in that crime against effective communication?

How you could be so fucking stupid as to suggest that America under Obama has moved closer to socialism when there is more economic inequality is beyond me. Providing basic necessities of life, food, shelter, access to health care, on a temporary basis to those who are unable to provide for themselves is not socialism. Taking a tiny bit from the the rest of to provide this pittance to poor people is not socialist redistribution of wealth. Health care reform did not redistribute wealth from rich or middle class to poor; it changed the means of delivering health care to the poor in a way that has slowed the growth of health care costs for everyone. The wealth is redistributed from one group of taxpayers to another group, those who work in the health care industry. Of course, your 12 grade GED brain will not allow you to understand any of this.

Placing 1/6th of the economy under a command and control structure to be centrally managed and planned, as has happened under Obama's Fascist Care, unquestionably moves the nation closer to state managed economy, AKA Socialism.

BTW, the increase in health care costs have been vast under the ACA. The costs not only have not been slowed, but have accelerated exponentially.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So you believe that some people are better than others. How un-socialist of you.

I wish he believed in periods, commas, and semicolons....

 

[koshergrl]

So you believe that some people are better than others. How un-socialist of you.

I wish he believed in periods, commas, and semicolons....

Well, he's better than you, so I guess he feels they would be wasted.

 

[paddymurphy]

There is a difference, you fucking moron, between a communist nation and a socialist one. There is a difference between communism, socialism and an economy with a mix of capitalism and socialism. There is no bright line. You think this country is socialist. By that measure, every successful nation in the world today is socialist. The reality is that such labels are for stupid people. Having social welfare programs does not make a nation socialist. Most of our GDP is from private economic activity.

Paddy, I've made no secret of my contempt for you - because you are quite stupid and mindlessly recite talking points from the hate sites.

Please explain what in your alleged mind, are the differentiating features between capitalism, socialism, and communism?

Have you ever heard of a 19th century book called "Capital?" Do you have any clue why it would be pertinent to this discussion?

You have contempt for the truth and for your betters....

So you believe that some people are better than others. How un-socialist of you.

Like most Americans, most democrats and most liberals, of course I am not a socialist.

 

[Skylar]

There is a difference, you fucking moron, between a communist nation and a socialist one. There is a difference between communism, socialism and an economy with a mix of capitalism and socialism. There is no bright line. You think this country is socialist. By that measure, every successful nation in the world today is socialist. The reality is that such labels are for stupid people. Having social welfare programs does not make a nation socialist. Most of our GDP is from private economic activity.

Paddy, I've made no secret of my contempt for you - because you are quite stupid and mindlessly recite talking points from the hate sites.

Please explain what in your alleged mind, are the differentiating features between capitalism, socialism, and communism?

Have you ever heard of a 19th century book called "Capital?" Do you have any clue why it would be pertinent to this discussion?

You have contempt for the truth and for your betters....

So you believe that some people are better than others. How un-socialist of you.

Actually, socialism would assume we are all equal. More evidence of how little idiots like you know about the terms you use.

'
They genuinely don't care. For crying out loud, socialism allows for private property while communism abolishes all private property. Yet their ilk still insist they are the 'same'.

These aren't minor differences. But profound ones.

Worse, when asked how democrats are 'socialists and communists' when almost none of them advocate collective ownership of all means of production or the abolishment of private property......they go deaf and dumb.

Hell, we even had Unsen make up a brand new definition of both socialism and regulation to try and make their hapless batshit work. They really have no fucks to give on what these terms actually mean.

 

[paddymurphy]

Sentences, paragraphs, and grammar oh my...

You have contempt for the truth and for your betters, those who understand these concepts far better than your feeble mind can even begin to grasp.

Of course; and your educational prowess is well exhibited through your well constructed posts, with articulation and adherence to the rules of grammar and logic....

Your GED has not prepared you to be able to discuss these topics.

Well, not everyone can match the erudite presentation of ideas that you offer. In fact few outside of a skid row gutter, clutching a bottle of Thunderbird, even come close.

Nearly every nation in Western Europe, North America, and Australia and New Zealand, as well as many aroung the world are capitalist nations with social welfare programs and regulations that dumb fucks like you equate to socialism.

It appears that you lack rudimentary reading comprehension skills. No real surprise.

I've explained on many occasions that the welfare state is not socialism. As the drooling retard Skyler cannot grasp, socialism requires the control of the means of production by the state. Merely engaging in transfer payments falls far short of the command and control structures used by central planners to manage an economy.

Most of the economic output in these nations is from privately owned business and entities. The government does not own the means of production. Though these companies operate according to governmental regulations, those regulations do not equate to government ownership or even control of their operations. Requiring a car maker to meet certain safety and fuel consumption regulations does not mean the government has taken over or controls the car maker. They still operate on a capitalist basis; they are owned by investors looking for a return on the investment; they are run by folks chosen by the owners of the companies; they make and sell products on the free market and return profit to the investors. All for profit companies do so. They produce most of the wealth in and income in the world.

Did you imagine that you had a point to make in that crime against effective communication?

How you could be so fucking stupid as to suggest that America under Obama has moved closer to socialism when there is more economic inequality is beyond me. Providing basic necessities of life, food, shelter, access to health care, on a temporary basis to those who are unable to provide for themselves is not socialism. Taking a tiny bit from the the rest of to provide this pittance to poor people is not socialist redistribution of wealth. Health care reform did not redistribute wealth from rich or middle class to poor; it changed the means of delivering health care to the poor in a way that has slowed the growth of health care costs for everyone. The wealth is redistributed from one group of taxpayers to another group, those who work in the health care industry. Of course, your 12 grade GED brain will not allow you to understand any of this.

Placing 1/6th of the economy under a command and control structure to be centrally managed and planned, as has happened under Obama's Fascist Care, unquestionably moves the nation closer to state managed economy, AKA Socialism.

BTW, the increase in health care costs have been vast under the ACA. The costs not only have not been slowed, but have accelerated exponentially.

"Did you imagine that you had a point to make in that crime against effective communication?"

Sorry, I will try to dumb it down for you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Actually, socialism would assume we are all equal. More evidence of how little idiots like you know about the terms you use.

Actually sarcasm would assume the reader has the requisite intelligence to recognize the instantiation....

 

[Uncensored2008]

They genuinely don't care. For crying out loud, socialism allows for private property while communism abolishes all private property. Yet their ilk still insist they are the 'same'.

These aren't minor differences. But profound ones.

Worse, when asked how democrats are 'socialists and communists' when almost none of them advocate collective ownership of all means of production or the abolishment of private property......they go deaf and dumb.

Hell, we even had Unsen make up a brand new definition of both socialism and regulation to try and make their hapless batshit work. They really have no fucks to give on what these terms actually mean.

Now Paddy, he's fun - at least for the moment. Granted, he can't put a sentence together to save his life; but at least he hasn't sunk to repeating the same defeated talking points, over and over and over.....

 

[koshergrl]

There is a difference, you fucking moron, between a communist nation and a socialist one. There is a difference between communism, socialism and an economy with a mix of capitalism and socialism. There is no bright line. You think this country is socialist. By that measure, every successful nation in the world today is socialist. The reality is that such labels are for stupid people. Having social welfare programs does not make a nation socialist. Most of our GDP is from private economic activity.

Paddy, I've made no secret of my contempt for you - because you are quite stupid and mindlessly recite talking points from the hate sites.

Please explain what in your alleged mind, are the differentiating features between capitalism, socialism, and communism?

Have you ever heard of a 19th century book called "Capital?" Do you have any clue why it would be pertinent to this discussion?

You have contempt for the truth and for your betters....

So you believe that some people are better than others. How un-socialist of you.

Like most Americans, most democrats and most liberals, of course I am not a socialist.

You mean you're a Marxist. Ok.

 

[Uncensored2008]

"Did you imagine that you had a point to make in that crime against effective communication?"

Sorry, I will try to dumb it down for you.

I sincerely doubt you can get much dumber; though you could ask Skyler for advice...

 

[Uncensored2008]

You mean you're a Marxist. Ok.

What's sad is the ignorance of these fools regarding the source of the ideas the espouse.

Skylar thinks that no one ever thought of having a centrally managed and planned economy before, ergo the democrats are brilliant and ground breaking...

 

[Skylar]

They genuinely don't care. For crying out loud, socialism allows for private property while communism abolishes all private property. Yet their ilk still insist they are the 'same'.

These aren't minor differences. But profound ones.

Worse, when asked how democrats are 'socialists and communists' when almost none of them advocate collective ownership of all means of production or the abolishment of private property......they go deaf and dumb.

Hell, we even had Unsen make up a brand new definition of both socialism and regulation to try and make their hapless batshit work. They really have no fucks to give on what these terms actually mean.

Now Paddy, he's fun - at least for the moment. Granted, he can't put a sentence together to save his life; but at least he hasn't sunk to repeating the same defeated talking points, over and over and over.....

When these points stump you cold and force you to abandon your entire argument, why would I change them?

The actual meaning of 'regulation' didn't match your made up batshit. You can't get around it. All you can do is run. And I get to point and laugh.

Obamacare doesn't control all aspects of the healthcare industry. So you ran. Regulation isn't ownership. So you ran. And all my previous questions about socialism, communism and democrats have sent your ilk into full rout.

That was easy.

 

[Uncensored2008]

When these points stump you cold and force you to abandon your entire argument, why would I change them?

The actual meaning of 'regulation' didn't match your made up batshit. You can't get around it. All you can do is run. And I get to point and laugh.

Obamacare doesn't control all aspects of the healthcare industry. So you ran. Regulation isn't ownership. So you ran. And all my previous questions about socialism, communism and democrats have sent your ilk into full rout.

That was easy.

Oh yes, I'm clearly stumped... Thus my open mocking of your drooling retardation...

 

[Skylar]

When these points stump you cold and force you to abandon your entire argument, why would I change them?

The actual meaning of 'regulation' didn't match your made up batshit. You can't get around it. All you can do is run. And I get to point and laugh.

Obamacare doesn't control all aspects of the healthcare industry. So you ran. Regulation isn't ownership. So you ran. And all my previous questions about socialism, communism and democrats have sent your ilk into full rout.

That was easy.

Oh yes, I'm clearly stumped... Thus my open mocking of your drooling retardation...

Laughing...says the poor hapless soul that replaces a rational, reasoned argument with the same old Ad Hominem fallacy.

Which begs the question; if all you were going to do was abandon your every argument and run with your tail between your legs, why bother spewing your made up definitions and helpless gibberish to begin with?