Dear
HaShev
Since you mention Michael, are you Jehovah's Witness or some other tribe?
Not everyone is under the same local authority/law though we are all under the same God.
I consider the tribes like the several states that all have their own local laws
and yet we are united under one law of the land that applies to all states.
If you believe in Michael on the level of Jesus, my understanding is that is a representation of
Father Son and Holy Spirit.
Michael represents the Merciful Judgment of God
Jesus represents Salvation and Restoring Justice with Peace.
So these are both "one with God" but not the same but DISTINCT.
I prefer to equate Jesus with the Son or Laws of God as Justice incarnate.
And equate Mercy and Comfort, Healing Peace with the Holy Spirit.
If you follow the path taught by JW then Holy Spirit is used for Active Force
and equate Jesus/Michael with the power of judgment.
If the way you teach works for you and those called to follow this, that is fine.
We are to respect the Gospel including holiday traditions that God gives to certain people,
and to let them hold sacred what is taught as sacred, if that is God's calling for you.
Not everyone has the same calling.
But from what I see, the different manifestations and powers that God gives
are still included in God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
If you prefer to share according to how the JW teach,
let me know and I am happy to stick to what is consistent.
But pls remember
HaShev
many people are called to understand God in other ways
and may not be called to receive the teaching as you have received it.
As long as you receive others, they will receive you.
But if you reject others, they will naturally reject you.
For example with the JW traditions of teaching:
Many Christians have argued that "Active Force" is in the Bible but was changed or interpreted from
a scripture that originally was written differently.
- The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society denies that the Holy Spirit is alive--the third person of the Trinity. Therefore, they have changed the correct translation of " . . . the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters," to say " . . . and God's active force was moving to and fro over the surface of the waters."
So any arguments that "God" or "Jesus" does not appear literally in the Bible but was changed later,
similar arguments are made that Active Force is not originally in the Bible but was changed later.
So this depends on what traditions people are called to follow.
Similar with teachings about Michael and Jesus that not everyone is called to receive and follow.
Take care and please feel free to share.
It may help to explain what background you are coming from
so we can stick to the context and framework that you use.