I was thinking about that the other day. Their agenda is so unpopular that even their own party is blocking it.
That's what happens when you are illegitimate. Your ideas didn't win, your cheating machinery did.
Their agenda is popular with 80% of the voters. Their agenda isn’t unpopular. The United States is run by a group of rich people who are determined to keep money out of the hands of working people.
Joe Manchin drives a Maserati but he doesn’t want his voters to get a $300 tax cut to help hungry children. Republicans and conservatives believe that poor people won’t work unless they’re forced to. Manchan has even said this right out loud.
Studies routinely show that this is false.Studies show that people who get financial help to keep them stable and able to pay for food and utilities, are far more likely to go to work.
Studies from the 80s and 90s show that government assistance in the form of “earned income credits” actually encouraged poor people to find jobs. So of course the republican party went to far and stopped giving wage increases to lower wage workers and gave only expanded earned income credits and other government assistance to low wage workers.
Corporations were incentivized to keep wages low and let the government subsidize their low income workers. But middle class tax payers and low income workers were being squeezed by wage flat wages.
Last but certainly not least, Republicans could blame the poor and the cost of these income supplements and wage subsidies for rising budget deficits instead of placing the blame squarely on the corporations and their use of government programs to subsidize wages.
Wages, as a percentage of costs, are now at the same levels as they were in the Gilded Age. Corporations have absorbed increases in cost of plants, machinery, insurance, transportation and raw materials and are now more profitable than at any time in history, but their workers are living on food stamps.
Does that make any kind of economic sense to you.