Should A Person Whose Term Is Up Be Allowed To Remain In Office?

Powell says he's staying after his time is up.

While the term of his position as Chair expires May 15th, his term as a member of the board doesn't expire until January 31, 2028.

I'd compare it the situation where the party of the Speaker of the House loses majority. While the former Speaker lost that position, he remains as a congressman.
 

Opining about an election is not a crime. Conspiring to using fraudulent slates of electors in place of valid ones is a crime. Attacking Congress during a closed joint session is a crime. Democrat did none of that. Benedict Donald's New Republican Party did that. As Master of Ceremony in 2017 Joe Biden was never asked to throw out any votes. He had to gable down several Democrats for invalid objections. Just like Al Gore did in 2001.
 
Jerome Powell is refusing to leave office after his term expires. I can't wait to hear the left's response to this question. It could be a precedent. Trump 2028, no election needed. Trump should just refuse to leave office.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell announced Wednesday he will remain at the Fed as a governor after his term as chair ends next month

His term on the board is not up. His term as head of the board is up.
 
You would look under the part where Congress can control the purse strings, taxation, and financial well-being of the USA..
No. It's Treasury, which is an executive branch, retard. :slap:
 
Jerome Powell is refusing to leave office after his term expires. I can't wait to hear the left's response to this question. It could be a precedent. Trump 2028, no election needed. Trump should just refuse to leave office.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell announced Wednesday he will remain at the Fed as a governor after his term as chair ends next month

Yes that kind of went under the radar but is now coming out
Powell is another nooge who wants to poke at Trump. I’m not sure he can just declare he’s extending his term indefinitely
 
LOL. So, you finally figured that out, heh?
"The Defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won. He was also entitled to formally challenge the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means, such as by seeking recounts or audits of the popular vote in states or filing lawsuits challenging ballots and procedures. Indeed, in many cases, the Defendant did pursue these methods of contesting the election results. His efforts to change the outcome in any state through recounts, audits, or legal challenges were uniformly unsuccessful."

Pursuing unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results is not a free speech rights issue, it's a crime.

 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom