625,000 men died fighting the civil war, almost all were white. More than half of them were Union soldiers. These men gave their lives and the beneficiaries of their sacrifice were slaves, who gained their freedom as a result. Should they not be required to pay reparations to the descendants of those men who gave their lives so that blacks could enjoy the freedom and prosperity they enjoy in today's society?
This is why its so hard for me to take white people seriously. What an utterly ******* idiotic post.
Yeah? What, exactly is not accurate about any of that? Be specific and back it up.
625,000 men died fighting the civil war, almost all were white. More than half of them were Union soldiers. These men gave their lives and the beneficiaries of their sacrifice were slaves, who gained their freedom as a result. Should they not be required to pay reparations to the descendants of those men who gave their lives so that blacks could enjoy the freedom and prosperity they enjoy in today's society?
This is why its so hard for me to take white people seriously. What an utterly ******* idiotic post.
Yeah? What, exactly is not accurate about any of that? Be specific and back it up.
Yes cave chimp.
First you tell me when in the history of the US military has anyone paid the descendants of soldiers that died fighting for anything. I knew you were a dumb monkey but this takes the cake.
Furthermore, the war over "State's Rights" was fought to preserve the union and industrialize America. Slaves became obsolete, and became "free" by default.
But they were not really freed by these "noble humanitarians".....LMAO.
Jim Crow took over where slavery left off , and stayed in effect until the 1960's.
You're right. This post gets the dipstick award of the week...but consider the source.