Senate cannot try a private citizen !!!

[easyt65]

The Democrats conceded the 2016 election within 24 hours.

They spent the next 4 years collaborating with our enemies, violating both Constitution and laws, illegally spying on Americans, continuously attempting failed coup attempts for 4 YEARS, affected an admittedly politically partisan Impeachment, Obstructed Justice, committed Perjury, hid evidence, manufactured false evidence, censured the US AG for NOT breaking the law, created a 'Revenge Committee', are talking about rounding up Conservatives and Trump Supporters to put them in 're-education camps', created the 'Capitol Riot' theatrics to label Conservatives and Trump Supporters - all of them - as terrorists and to set up false accusations against Trump so they could Impeach him again, and are ADMITTEDLY conducting ANOTHER politically partisan Impeachment in an attempt to eliminate President Trump as a political threat in 2024 & beyond...

Yeah, you asshole 'conceded the election', forgot the whole thing, and moved on...

WHEN WILL THAT FINALLY BE, AGAIN?

They conceded the election, hotshot. All that crap that you are inventing has nothing to do with conceding the election. During the last 4 years, Trump has created a toxicity in our country the likes of which has never been seen before.
Trump created the mess that he got himself into. 'False evidence, AG and the law, revenge committee, create Capitol riot errorists, etc., collaborating, coup attempts,
spying' is a crock of shit. You are one sick puppy and your accusations are as phony as it gets.

phony (as in "hypocrite") n. : a person who professes beliefs and opinions that he or she does not hold in order to conceal his or her real feelings or motives

4 YEARS LATER, DEMOCRATS ARE STILL TRYING TO 'GET EVEN'...

They have NOT moved on...

 

[Bobob]

The Democrats conceded the 2016 election within 24 hours.

They spent the next 4 years collaborating with our enemies, violating both Constitution and laws, illegally spying on Americans, continuously attempting failed coup attempts for 4 YEARS, affected an admittedly politically partisan Impeachment, Obstructed Justice, committed Perjury, hid evidence, manufactured false evidence, censured the US AG for NOT breaking the law, created a 'Revenge Committee', are talking about rounding up Conservatives and Trump Supporters to put them in 're-education camps', created the 'Capitol Riot' theatrics to label Conservatives and Trump Supporters - all of them - as terrorists and to set up false accusations against Trump so they could Impeach him again, and are ADMITTEDLY conducting ANOTHER politically partisan Impeachment in an attempt to eliminate President Trump as a political threat in 2024 & beyond...

Yeah, you asshole 'conceded the election', forgot the whole thing, and moved on...

WHEN WILL THAT FINALLY BE, AGAIN?

They conceded the election, hotshot. All that crap that you are inventing has nothing to do with conceding the election. During the last 4 years, Trump has created a toxicity in our country the likes of which has never been seen before.
Trump created the mess that he got himself into. 'False evidence, AG and the law, revenge committee, create Capitol riot errorists, etc., collaborating, coup attempts,
spying' is a crock of shit. You are one sick puppy and your accusations are as phony as it gets.

phony (as in "hypocrite") n. : a person who professes beliefs and opinions that he or she does not hold in order to conceal his or her real feelings or motives

4 YEARS LATER, DEMOCRATS ARE STILL TRYING TO 'GET EVEN'...

They have NOT moved on...

Don't think so. What Trump did was reprehensible and now, as a private citizen,
he will have to answer for his bad behavior on many levels.

 

[Nostra]

They have zero constitutional power or right to do so
Trying T on fake charges is only a “ Soviet show trial “

These articles say that Senator Leahy will preside.

Sen. Leahy to Preside Over Impeachment, Not Chief Justice Roberts

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the longest-serving Senate Democrat, will preside over former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial instead of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, The Hill reported.

www.newsmax.com

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the longest-serving Senate Democrat, will preside over former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial instead of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, The Hill reported.

Leahy, not Roberts, to preside over impeachment trial

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts will not preside over former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial, which is scheduled to begin in earnest on Feb. 8.

thehill.com

A clear violation of the Constitution.

 

[easyt65]

Don't think so. What Trump did was reprehensible...

Yeah, how dare he beat Hillary...

 

[surada]

Don't think so. What Trump did was reprehensible...

Yeah, how dare he beat Hillary...

Hillary conceded the election within 24 hours..

 

[9thIDdoc]

Nope. Not proven the protestors killed anybody. Maybe some evidence one rioter might have been involved in a homicide. Overwhelming evidence a Capitol cop committed homicide and that you are somehow trying to blame that on alleged rioters with unproven intentions.

Sure. Clock someone in the head with a fire extinguisher and hours later they die of a stroke.

Then pretend like it was totally unrelated.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No. I think you should stop believing every bit of propaganda just because it fits the party line you've been spoon-fed. Think for yourself. Try it; you'll like it. If you're a full grown American you know dam well we all have a right due process and a right to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law (not in the words of someone wanting to incite a rush to judgement). Did you autopsy the man? Would have known what to look for if you had? Have you given your testimony in court and allowed a judge and jury to decide the value of your testimony? I'm not willing to presume anything unless I have to and I am not willing to presume that someone is willing to premeditate murder with a fire extinguisher as his weapon of choice.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No, I have worked as armed security and I know that the law did not allow me to use excessive force (which is exactly what blm claims to be continually rioting about). I know that it is illegal-and a serious crime- to use lethal force against a person unless there is cause to believe that person is about to commit murder or grievous bodily to another. I know that even a soldier during a battle can be held responsible for shooting down a unarmed civilian. Trespass on public property is not a capital crime. Neither is vandalism. Somebody at the very least has some explaining to do. Or do you really want to give murderers a free pass just because they have a government connection?

 

[easyt65]

Hillary conceded the election within 24 hours..

That bitch is STILL whining about losing...another crazy leftist who never moved on...

 

[9thIDdoc]

In DC there may have been one dead hero and that hero was not killed by rioters but by Capitol Security.

You are supporting a domestic terrorist. You are a piece of shit

Wrong. I support the Constitution you seem determined to wipe your stinky ass on.

No you don't.

Former President Donald Trump can be convicted in an impeachment trial for his role in inciting the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6 even though he is no longer in office, a bipartisan group of constitutional law scholars wrote in a letter Thursday.

And other and more impressive legal scholars say just the opposite. Alan Dershowitz is one.
During the stealing of the presidency some judges cited the principal of "latches" to deny Trump
legal pleadings.

Latches means in plain English "not timely or you're too late".

I wouldn't use Dershowitz as an example. He is listed as a visitor to Jeffrey's island.
Attorney Alan Dershowitz and the Jeffrey Epstein Case
nymag.com › intelligencer › 2019/07 › alan-dershowitz-j...
Jul 19, 2019 — The famed attorney Alan Dershowitz's onetime client Jeffrey Epstein was ... Dershowitz liked the island and has been coming back for 50 years. ... When I visited his downstairs bathroom, I noticed it was decorated with cheeky ...
Could be a reason for his reversal as an ultra-liberal to a defender of trump and Jeffrey, yes?

Your boys during Trump's inauguration American hater.

Anarchists aren’t anyone’s boys. You are just desperate now.

There was no outrage over on your side when it happens to a Republican. Only silence, and in fact Harris raised funds for bail for the democrat scumbags over the summer. That should get her impeached.

No, Harris didn't. You scumbags are trying to treat a legitimate protest over murders of unarmed citizens that actually happened to an insurrection because of something that didn't. There is no equivalence.

1 day of rioting incited and engaged in by Antifa and BLM, the 1st Trump even in hundreds, with millions attending those events combined, in which violence occurred...but it was just another day of violence for Antifa and BLM.

The destruction caused by these foreign-funded Democrat-supported domestic terrorist has cost our communities hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars...

...and unlike the Capitol event, it continues...just as Harris said it would...just as she called for it to continue.

"IT SHOULD NOT STOP. WE SHOULD NOT STOP!'

Left-wing riots rattle US cities even after President Biden's inauguration

Left-wing protests have rattled a handful of cities across the U.S. even after President Biden's inauguration – leading to vandalism of government buildings and at least 20 arrests.

www.foxnews.com

IMPEACH HER ASS!

Not that accuracy matters to you...but supporting PROTESTS is far different from supporting riots.

You hate both in the case of the events of the summer and SUPPORT both in the case of the Capitol Insurrection

Don't look now but you are doing the same thing. Who decides what is a riot and what is a protest?

No one but Trumpers could watch and hear all the video of those SAVAGES who broke in to the capitol searching for Pence to hang him, and others, or brutally and viciously attacking Capitol police with flag poles still bearing our sacred flag and 2x4s, and baseball bats, and fire extinguishers,

could not know the attack on the capitol was a riot and attempted insurrection.

You lost your "the party of law and order" claim....that you never should have owned in the first place.

They were let in by the police. It was a photo op your still milking. The one breaking the windows was a Bernie supporter so you have skin in this also.

The police did not let anybody in to destroy and kill.

They let them in for a photo op. Democrats have blood on their hands.

Nope! They are under investigation for being TRUMP sympathizers...

There are also blm and antifa under investigation, we know they're liberals.

We do? What we know is that they are mostly black and you can translate that any way it suits you. If liberal they probably vote with the Dems, but so what? Violence
should not be tolerated and our military should clean it up because it is probably the same group that is being encouraged by white supremacists or some other entity.

The military couldn't go in because the liberal mayors and governors wanted the violence.

Nope, the mayor doesn't control the capitol btw, and others like the governor of Maryland asked for permission for the Maryland NG to be brought in.... but it took 2 hours plus, to get the permission from the Trump admin to enter DC.

Trump offered Portland the national guard and said they would stop it. They said no. Stop trying to rewrite history. You people ruined thousands of peoples lives. Trying to make Trump look bad, you people are scum.

I'm sorry, Portland is Portland's problem....the governor and mayor and citizens in that state can work and solve their problems... I have zero say.

But the US Capitol is my capitol and your capitol and the nation's capitol.... I do have say, the damage and harm by these rioters, hurt me and all other Americans across the nation.

Why even try to compare Apples and oranges?

Portland and DC are BOTH equally America and belong equally to all American citizens. Or did before it was overrun by Biden's Bitches. But that won't last either.

The buildings in Oregon that were destroyed do NOT belong equally to all American citizens. Stop trying to compare the two violent acts so that you can gain some solace. Why are you politicizing these incidents unless you think that an attack on our government demands the same attention as any other violent act?
Usurping our Democracy and trying to kill our lawmakers deserves what those criminal insurrectionists will get. They were trying to create a coup for that encouraging menace, Trump. A little different purpose, yes? Think about a dictatorship under the control of Trump and his thugs. The attackers out west will also get theirs and it is time that force is used--lethal force.

Actually the 1/6 DC protest saw little violence and by far the worst of that was perpetrated by the Capitol police. The left wing riots over that last couple of years have been far more violent. Politicizing? Biden's Bitches have been doing their utmost to generate mass hysteria over a minor event to provide an excuse to militarize DC as a means to terrorize and dominate citizens and seize control of public and private property indefinitely. And of course use the China Flu hysteria to control and manipulate people nationwide. If anybody else were doing it it would be considered fear mongering. One instance of violence deserves equal attention as does the same level of violence occurring elsewhere regardless of any political considerations. But that not what we are seeing. Not near. You are the "attacker," dumbazz, as well as a massive hypocrite with suicidal tendencies.

You should read Profiles in Courage. Its about doing the right thing even if you lose your next election.

Do you consider yourself a patriot or just a Trumpie?

Apples and oranges.
Both

 

[Dogbiscuit]

They have zero constitutional power or right to do so
Trying T on fake charges is only a “ Soviet show trial “

These articles say that Senator Leahy will preside.

Sen. Leahy to Preside Over Impeachment, Not Chief Justice Roberts

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the longest-serving Senate Democrat, will preside over former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial instead of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, The Hill reported.

www.newsmax.com

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the longest-serving Senate Democrat, will preside over former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial instead of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, The Hill reported.

Leahy, not Roberts, to preside over impeachment trial

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts will not preside over former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial, which is scheduled to begin in earnest on Feb. 8.

thehill.com

A clear violation of the Constitution.

I dont think so, unless youre being sarcastic again. I cant always tell.

Roberts oversaw Trump's first impeachment trial in 2020. The U.S. Constitution says the chief justice presides when the person facing trial is the current president of the United States. President Joe Biden was inaugurated last Wednesday.

 

[9thIDdoc]

In DC there may have been one dead hero and that hero was not killed by rioters but by Capitol Security.

You are supporting a domestic terrorist. You are a piece of shit

Wrong. I support the Constitution you seem determined to wipe your stinky ass on.

No you don't.

Former President Donald Trump can be convicted in an impeachment trial for his role in inciting the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6 even though he is no longer in office, a bipartisan group of constitutional law scholars wrote in a letter Thursday.

And other and more impressive legal scholars say just the opposite. Alan Dershowitz is one.
During the stealing of the presidency some judges cited the principal of "latches" to deny Trump
legal pleadings.

Latches means in plain English "not timely or you're too late".

I wouldn't use Dershowitz as an example. He is listed as a visitor to Jeffrey's island.
Attorney Alan Dershowitz and the Jeffrey Epstein Case
nymag.com › intelligencer › 2019/07 › alan-dershowitz-j...
Jul 19, 2019 — The famed attorney Alan Dershowitz's onetime client Jeffrey Epstein was ... Dershowitz liked the island and has been coming back for 50 years. ... When I visited his downstairs bathroom, I noticed it was decorated with cheeky ...
Could be a reason for his reversal as an ultra-liberal to a defender of trump and Jeffrey, yes?

Your boys during Trump's inauguration American hater.

Anarchists aren’t anyone’s boys. You are just desperate now.

There was no outrage over on your side when it happens to a Republican. Only silence, and in fact Harris raised funds for bail for the democrat scumbags over the summer. That should get her impeached.

No, Harris didn't. You scumbags are trying to treat a legitimate protest over murders of unarmed citizens that actually happened to an insurrection because of something that didn't. There is no equivalence.

1 day of rioting incited and engaged in by Antifa and BLM, the 1st Trump even in hundreds, with millions attending those events combined, in which violence occurred...but it was just another day of violence for Antifa and BLM.

The destruction caused by these foreign-funded Democrat-supported domestic terrorist has cost our communities hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars...

...and unlike the Capitol event, it continues...just as Harris said it would...just as she called for it to continue.

"IT SHOULD NOT STOP. WE SHOULD NOT STOP!'

Left-wing riots rattle US cities even after President Biden's inauguration

Left-wing protests have rattled a handful of cities across the U.S. even after President Biden's inauguration – leading to vandalism of government buildings and at least 20 arrests.

www.foxnews.com

IMPEACH HER ASS!

Not that accuracy matters to you...but supporting PROTESTS is far different from supporting riots.

You hate both in the case of the events of the summer and SUPPORT both in the case of the Capitol Insurrection

Don't look now but you are doing the same thing. Who decides what is a riot and what is a protest?

No one but Trumpers could watch and hear all the video of those SAVAGES who broke in to the capitol searching for Pence to hang him, and others, or brutally and viciously attacking Capitol police with flag poles still bearing our sacred flag and 2x4s, and baseball bats, and fire extinguishers,

could not know the attack on the capitol was a riot and attempted insurrection.

You lost your "the party of law and order" claim....that you never should have owned in the first place.

They were let in by the police. It was a photo op your still milking. The one breaking the windows was a Bernie supporter so you have skin in this also.

The police did not let anybody in to destroy and kill.

They let them in for a photo op. Democrats have blood on their hands.

Nope! They are under investigation for being TRUMP sympathizers...

There are also blm and antifa under investigation, we know they're liberals.

We do? What we know is that they are mostly black and you can translate that any way it suits you. If liberal they probably vote with the Dems, but so what? Violence
should not be tolerated and our military should clean it up because it is probably the same group that is being encouraged by white supremacists or some other entity.

The military couldn't go in because the liberal mayors and governors wanted the violence.

Nope, the mayor doesn't control the capitol btw, and others like the governor of Maryland asked for permission for the Maryland NG to be brought in.... but it took 2 hours plus, to get the permission from the Trump admin to enter DC.

Trump offered Portland the national guard and said they would stop it. They said no. Stop trying to rewrite history. You people ruined thousands of peoples lives. Trying to make Trump look bad, you people are scum.

I'm sorry, Portland is Portland's problem....the governor and mayor and citizens in that state can work and solve their problems... I have zero say.

But the US Capitol is my capitol and your capitol and the nation's capitol.... I do have say, the damage and harm by these rioters, hurt me and all other Americans across the nation.

Why even try to compare Apples and oranges?

Portland and DC are BOTH equally America and belong equally to all American citizens. Or did before it was overrun by Biden's Bitches. But that won't last either.

The buildings in Oregon that were destroyed do NOT belong equally to all American citizens. Stop trying to compare the two violent acts so that you can gain some solace. Why are you politicizing these incidents unless you think that an attack on our government demands the same attention as any other violent act?
Usurping our Democracy and trying to kill our lawmakers deserves what those criminal insurrectionists will get. They were trying to create a coup for that encouraging menace, Trump. A little different purpose, yes? Think about a dictatorship under the control of Trump and his thugs. The attackers out west will also get theirs and it is time that force is used--lethal force.

Actually the 1/6 DC protest saw little violence and by far the worst of that was perpetrated by the Capitol police. The left wing riots over that last couple of years have been far more violent. Politicizing? Biden's Bitches have been doing their utmost to generate mass hysteria over a minor event to provide an excuse to militarize DC as a means to terrorize and dominate citizens and seize control of public and private property indefinitely. And of course use the China Flu hysteria to control and manipulate people nationwide. If anybody else were doing it it would be considered fear mongering. One instance of violence deserves equal attention as does the same level of violence occurring elsewhere regardless of any political considerations. But that not what we are seeing. Not near. You are the "attacker," dumbazz, as well as a massive hypocrite with suicidal tendencies.

"Those who are in oregon know..

Oregon anarchists. Been around for decades and pop up every so often. Especially in Portland and Eugene. They show up, break stuff until they get arrested and disappear for a few more years. Basically hippies that get violent. They don't have anything to do with Antifa, BLM or really anything. They are just pain in the ass kids that end up ruining their lives going to jail for being stupid.
its reality, deal with it."
I say that we forgive the Insurrection and refer to it as a visit by peaceful protesters, yes? That is your take on it. You are making lite of a very serious episode in U.S history, as trump-a-dumps stormed the Capitol, trashed the place, went hunting for certain lawmakers, killed 6 people in their effort to denigrate the seat of our Democracy. No attempt at rationalization or comparing it to other illicit activities will ever change its place in history since history will treat this attack as an insurrection against our government.

Trump is using these fringe people to take revenge on the country and the Republican party.

That's what he has always done when he fails. He's out to destroy America.

Branson: I met Trump in the 1990s, and all he talked about was destroying people who wouldn't help one of his bankrupt businesses

The billionaire Virgin Group founder says the meeting was focused on the fallout from the bankruptcy of one of Trump's companies.

www.cnbc.com

Who you calling "fringe people" twerp? And what do you think you know about America?

 

[Lesh]

Who you calling "fringe people" twerp? And what do you think you know about America?

He was talking about the Capitol Insurrectionists...and I agree with you. They were not "fringe". They were WHO you Trumpers are

 

[Lastamender]

Who you calling "fringe people" twerp? And what do you think you know about America?

He was talking about the Capitol Insurrectionists...and I agree with you. They were not "fringe". They were WHO you Trumpers are

Oh! The drama. You do not give a shit about this country or its laws.

 

[JoeB131]

Evidently that didn’t work for election fraud. Funny how that works.

Um, actually, what you guys have on tape isn't what you were told it was... that's the thing.

We have been through this. Only mindless drones think the China flu was Trump’s fault.

Well, you can see why Trump didn't have time to fight Covid, he was too busy plotting an overthrow of hte government.

Only the brain-dead Democrats believe that. They can vote not to impeach and they won’t lose a single Republican vote. Democrats have been gone far too long...I no longer care what Democrats think or don’t think.

YOu weren't the one who had a bunch of inbred rednecks storming your workplace with zipties looking to murder you.

 

[Nostra]

They have zero constitutional power or right to do so
Trying T on fake charges is only a “ Soviet show trial “

These articles say that Senator Leahy will preside.

Sen. Leahy to Preside Over Impeachment, Not Chief Justice Roberts

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the longest-serving Senate Democrat, will preside over former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial instead of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, The Hill reported.

www.newsmax.com

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the longest-serving Senate Democrat, will preside over former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial instead of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, The Hill reported.

Leahy, not Roberts, to preside over impeachment trial

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts will not preside over former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial, which is scheduled to begin in earnest on Feb. 8.

thehill.com

A clear violation of the Constitution.

I dont think so, unless youre being sarcastic again. I cant always tell.

Roberts oversaw Trump's first impeachment trial in 2020. The U.S. Constitution says the chief justice presides when the person facing trial is the current president of the United States. President Joe Biden was inaugurated last Wednesday.

The Constitution states the Chief Justice of the SC must preside over an impeachment of a President, not one of the Jurors from the opposing party.

 

[colfax_m]

Nope. Not proven the protestors killed anybody. Maybe some evidence one rioter might have been involved in a homicide. Overwhelming evidence a Capitol cop committed homicide and that you are somehow trying to blame that on alleged rioters with unproven intentions.

Sure. Clock someone in the head with a fire extinguisher and hours later they die of a stroke.

Then pretend like it was totally unrelated.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No. I think you should stop believing every bit of propaganda just because it fits the party line you've been spoon-fed. Think for yourself. Try it; you'll like it. If you're a full grown American you know dam well we all have a right due process and a right to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law (not in the words of someone wanting to incite a rush to judgement). Did you autopsy the man? Would have known what to look for if you had? Have you given your testimony in court and allowed a judge and jury to decide the value of your testimony? I'm not willing to presume anything unless I have to and I am not willing to presume that someone is willing to premeditate murder with a fire extinguisher as his weapon of choice.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No, I have worked as armed security and I know that the law did not allow me to use excessive force (which is exactly what blm claims to be continually rioting about). I know that it is illegal-and a serious crime- to use lethal force against a person unless there is cause to believe that person is about to commit murder or grievous bodily to another. I know that even a soldier during a battle can be held responsible for shooting down a unarmed civilian. Trespass on public property is not a capital crime. Neither is vandalism. Somebody at the very least has some explaining to do. Or do you really want to give murderers a free pass just because they have a government connection?

I don’t have to believe propaganda.

I think a violent mob overwhelming police and attempting to reach Congress is clearly enough to justify a rational fear of threat to life or bodily harm.

 

[9thIDdoc]

In DC there may have been one dead hero and that hero was not killed by rioters but by Capitol Security.

You are supporting a domestic terrorist. You are a piece of shit

Wrong. I support the Constitution you seem determined to wipe your stinky ass on.

No you don't.

Former President Donald Trump can be convicted in an impeachment trial for his role in inciting the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6 even though he is no longer in office, a bipartisan group of constitutional law scholars wrote in a letter Thursday.

And other and more impressive legal scholars say just the opposite. Alan Dershowitz is one.
During the stealing of the presidency some judges cited the principal of "latches" to deny Trump
legal pleadings.

Latches means in plain English "not timely or you're too late".

I wouldn't use Dershowitz as an example. He is listed as a visitor to Jeffrey's island.
Attorney Alan Dershowitz and the Jeffrey Epstein Case
nymag.com › intelligencer › 2019/07 › alan-dershowitz-j...
Jul 19, 2019 — The famed attorney Alan Dershowitz's onetime client Jeffrey Epstein was ... Dershowitz liked the island and has been coming back for 50 years. ... When I visited his downstairs bathroom, I noticed it was decorated with cheeky ...
Could be a reason for his reversal as an ultra-liberal to a defender of trump and Jeffrey, yes?

Your boys during Trump's inauguration American hater.

Anarchists aren’t anyone’s boys. You are just desperate now.

There was no outrage over on your side when it happens to a Republican. Only silence, and in fact Harris raised funds for bail for the democrat scumbags over the summer. That should get her impeached.

No, Harris didn't. You scumbags are trying to treat a legitimate protest over murders of unarmed citizens that actually happened to an insurrection because of something that didn't. There is no equivalence.

1 day of rioting incited and engaged in by Antifa and BLM, the 1st Trump even in hundreds, with millions attending those events combined, in which violence occurred...but it was just another day of violence for Antifa and BLM.

The destruction caused by these foreign-funded Democrat-supported domestic terrorist has cost our communities hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars...

...and unlike the Capitol event, it continues...just as Harris said it would...just as she called for it to continue.

"IT SHOULD NOT STOP. WE SHOULD NOT STOP!'

Left-wing riots rattle US cities even after President Biden's inauguration

Left-wing protests have rattled a handful of cities across the U.S. even after President Biden's inauguration – leading to vandalism of government buildings and at least 20 arrests.

www.foxnews.com

IMPEACH HER ASS!

Not that accuracy matters to you...but supporting PROTESTS is far different from supporting riots.

You hate both in the case of the events of the summer and SUPPORT both in the case of the Capitol Insurrection

Don't look now but you are doing the same thing. Who decides what is a riot and what is a protest?

No one but Trumpers could watch and hear all the video of those SAVAGES who broke in to the capitol searching for Pence to hang him, and others, or brutally and viciously attacking Capitol police with flag poles still bearing our sacred flag and 2x4s, and baseball bats, and fire extinguishers,

could not know the attack on the capitol was a riot and attempted insurrection.

You lost your "the party of law and order" claim....that you never should have owned in the first place.

They were let in by the police. It was a photo op your still milking. The one breaking the windows was a Bernie supporter so you have skin in this also.

The police did not let anybody in to destroy and kill.

They let them in for a photo op. Democrats have blood on their hands.

Nope! They are under investigation for being TRUMP sympathizers...

There are also blm and antifa under investigation, we know they're liberals.

We do? What we know is that they are mostly black and you can translate that any way it suits you. If liberal they probably vote with the Dems, but so what? Violence
should not be tolerated and our military should clean it up because it is probably the same group that is being encouraged by white supremacists or some other entity.

The military couldn't go in because the liberal mayors and governors wanted the violence.

Nope, the mayor doesn't control the capitol btw, and others like the governor of Maryland asked for permission for the Maryland NG to be brought in.... but it took 2 hours plus, to get the permission from the Trump admin to enter DC.

Trump offered Portland the national guard and said they would stop it. They said no. Stop trying to rewrite history. You people ruined thousands of peoples lives. Trying to make Trump look bad, you people are scum.

I'm sorry, Portland is Portland's problem....the governor and mayor and citizens in that state can work and solve their problems... I have zero say.

But the US Capitol is my capitol and your capitol and the nation's capitol.... I do have say, the damage and harm by these rioters, hurt me and all other Americans across the nation.

Why even try to compare Apples and oranges?

Portland and DC are BOTH equally America and belong equally to all American citizens. Or did before it was overrun by Biden's Bitches. But that won't last either.

The buildings in Oregon that were destroyed do NOT belong equally to all American citizens. Stop trying to compare the two violent acts so that you can gain some solace. Why are you politicizing these incidents unless you think that an attack on our government demands the same attention as any other violent act?
Usurping our Democracy and trying to kill our lawmakers deserves what those criminal insurrectionists will get. They were trying to create a coup for that encouraging menace, Trump. A little different purpose, yes? Think about a dictatorship under the control of Trump and his thugs. The attackers out west will also get theirs and it is time that force is used--lethal force.

Actually the 1/6 DC protest saw little violence and by far the worst of that was perpetrated by the Capitol police. The left wing riots over that last couple of years have been far more violent. Politicizing? Biden's Bitches have been doing their utmost to generate mass hysteria over a minor event to provide an excuse to militarize DC as a means to terrorize and dominate citizens and seize control of public and private property indefinitely. And of course use the China Flu hysteria to control and manipulate people nationwide. If anybody else were doing it it would be considered fear mongering. One instance of violence deserves equal attention as does the same level of violence occurring elsewhere regardless of any political considerations. But that not what we are seeing. Not near. You are the "attacker," dumbazz, as well as a massive hypocrite with suicidal tendencies.

"Those who are in oregon know..

Oregon anarchists. Been around for decades and pop up every so often. Especially in Portland and Eugene. They show up, break stuff until they get arrested and disappear for a few more years. Basically hippies that get violent. They don't have anything to do with Antifa, BLM or really anything. They are just pain in the ass kids that end up ruining their lives going to jail for being stupid.
its reality, deal with it."
I say that we forgive the Insurrection and refer to it as a visit by peaceful protesters, yes? That is your take on it. You are making lite of a very serious episode in U.S history, as trump-a-dumps stormed the Capitol, trashed the place, went hunting for certain lawmakers, killed 6 people in their effort to denigrate the seat of our Democracy. No attempt at rationalization or comparing it to other illicit activities will ever change its place in history since history will treat this attack as an insurrection against our government.

"...killed 6 people in their effort to denigrate the seat of our Democracy. No attempt at rationalization or comparing it to other illicit activities will ever change its place in history since history will treat this attack as an insurrection against our government."

And no amount of wild-eyed hysteria on your part is going to prove that there were 6 people killed, who killed who or why. Nor is any rationalization on your part going to prove there was an insurrection. History is what it is. Deal with it. Stop trying to invent it.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Nope. Not proven the protestors killed anybody. Maybe some evidence one rioter might have been involved in a homicide. Overwhelming evidence a Capitol cop committed homicide and that you are somehow trying to blame that on alleged rioters with unproven intentions.

Sure. Clock someone in the head with a fire extinguisher and hours later they die of a stroke.

Then pretend like it was totally unrelated.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No. I think you should stop believing every bit of propaganda just because it fits the party line you've been spoon-fed. Think for yourself. Try it; you'll like it. If you're a full grown American you know dam well we all have a right due process and a right to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law (not in the words of someone wanting to incite a rush to judgement). Did you autopsy the man? Would have known what to look for if you had? Have you given your testimony in court and allowed a judge and jury to decide the value of your testimony? I'm not willing to presume anything unless I have to and I am not willing to presume that someone is willing to premeditate murder with a fire extinguisher as his weapon of choice.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No, I have worked as armed security and I know that the law did not allow me to use excessive force (which is exactly what blm claims to be continually rioting about). I know that it is illegal-and a serious crime- to use lethal force against a person unless there is cause to believe that person is about to commit murder or grievous bodily to another. I know that even a soldier during a battle can be held responsible for shooting down a unarmed civilian. Trespass on public property is not a capital crime. Neither is vandalism. Somebody at the very least has some explaining to do. Or do you really want to give murderers a free pass just because they have a government connection?

I don’t have to believe propaganda.

I think a violent mob overwhelming police and attempting to reach Congress is clearly enough to justify a rational fear of threat to life or bodily harm.

A mob wasn't killed; a person was. By another person.

 

[Lastamender]

Nope. Not proven the protestors killed anybody. Maybe some evidence one rioter might have been involved in a homicide. Overwhelming evidence a Capitol cop committed homicide and that you are somehow trying to blame that on alleged rioters with unproven intentions.

Sure. Clock someone in the head with a fire extinguisher and hours later they die of a stroke.

Then pretend like it was totally unrelated.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No. I think you should stop believing every bit of propaganda just because it fits the party line you've been spoon-fed. Think for yourself. Try it; you'll like it. If you're a full grown American you know dam well we all have a right due process and a right to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law (not in the words of someone wanting to incite a rush to judgement). Did you autopsy the man? Would have known what to look for if you had? Have you given your testimony in court and allowed a judge and jury to decide the value of your testimony? I'm not willing to presume anything unless I have to and I am not willing to presume that someone is willing to premeditate murder with a fire extinguisher as his weapon of choice.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No, I have worked as armed security and I know that the law did not allow me to use excessive force (which is exactly what blm claims to be continually rioting about). I know that it is illegal-and a serious crime- to use lethal force against a person unless there is cause to believe that person is about to commit murder or grievous bodily to another. I know that even a soldier during a battle can be held responsible for shooting down a unarmed civilian. Trespass on public property is not a capital crime. Neither is vandalism. Somebody at the very least has some explaining to do. Or do you really want to give murderers a free pass just because they have a government connection?

I don’t have to believe propaganda.

I think a violent mob overwhelming police and attempting to reach Congress is clearly enough to justify a rational fear of threat to life or bodily harm.

I don’t have to believe propaganda.

That's too bad because that is all you believe.

 

[colfax_m]

A mob wasn't killed; a person was. By another person.

Ugh, are you going to be unnecessarily obtuse.

A mob is a group of people. She was part of that mob. Her presence there, given the actions she was participating in, is more than enough to provide reasonable cause to feel threatened.

 

[colfax_m]

Nope. Not proven the protestors killed anybody. Maybe some evidence one rioter might have been involved in a homicide. Overwhelming evidence a Capitol cop committed homicide and that you are somehow trying to blame that on alleged rioters with unproven intentions.

Sure. Clock someone in the head with a fire extinguisher and hours later they die of a stroke.

Then pretend like it was totally unrelated.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No. I think you should stop believing every bit of propaganda just because it fits the party line you've been spoon-fed. Think for yourself. Try it; you'll like it. If you're a full grown American you know dam well we all have a right due process and a right to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law (not in the words of someone wanting to incite a rush to judgement). Did you autopsy the man? Would have known what to look for if you had? Have you given your testimony in court and allowed a judge and jury to decide the value of your testimony? I'm not willing to presume anything unless I have to and I am not willing to presume that someone is willing to premeditate murder with a fire extinguisher as his weapon of choice.

So you think the police should have waited for the mob to overrun Congress so they could find out their intentions?

No, I have worked as armed security and I know that the law did not allow me to use excessive force (which is exactly what blm claims to be continually rioting about). I know that it is illegal-and a serious crime- to use lethal force against a person unless there is cause to believe that person is about to commit murder or grievous bodily to another. I know that even a soldier during a battle can be held responsible for shooting down a unarmed civilian. Trespass on public property is not a capital crime. Neither is vandalism. Somebody at the very least has some explaining to do. Or do you really want to give murderers a free pass just because they have a government connection?

I don’t have to believe propaganda.

I think a violent mob overwhelming police and attempting to reach Congress is clearly enough to justify a rational fear of threat to life or bodily harm.

I don’t have to believe propaganda.

That's too bad because that is all you believe.

Do tell. What propaganda do I believe?