Senate cannot try a private citizen !!!

[9thIDdoc]

Unarmed is unarmed. You people have already justified fraud, are you going for manslaughter too?

So the cop who killed Mike Brown was guilty of manslaughter? The guy that killed Trayvon Martin was guilty of manslaughter?

In America each individual person is to be held responsible for their own actions;

According to that the getaway driver in a bank robbery has committed no crime if the robbers never get out of the bank?

It is illegal to plan and participate in the commission of a crime. Attempted robbery is a crime but even he has a right to due process. Something you can't seem to remember.

 

[lantern2814]

They have zero constitutional power or right to do so
Trying T on fake charges is only a “ Soviet show trial “

Whoever told you that was hoping you didn't do well in school and it looks like they were correct.

Learn about William Belknap.

He was the secretary of the defense in 1876. He knew he was going to be impeached so he resigned.

That didn't stop the congress. The House impeached him. The Senate voted 37-29 to convict.

He was a private citizen when he was impeached and convicted.

He is the only member of a presidential cabinet to be impeached.

Where were you in school when you were supposed to learn this?

Hey idiot, that guy was never President. Complete bullshit comparison. Guess you dropped out before third grade when most of us learned this. Try to remember this too. Pisslosi the drunk has not turned over those bullshit articles to the Senate. Now it’s too late as Trump has left office and the process was not completed. So they’re now shit out of luck. Moron.

 

[Nostra]

By an unarmed woman? I do not see that as a death threat is anyway shape or form. A death threat, fear for your life, is when deadly force should be used. That did not happen.

Was she alone?

Unarmed is unarmed. You people have already justified fraud, are you going for manslaughter too?

Are you under the impression that an unarmed mob (not counting the blunt instruments many of them were carrying) is incapable of causing bodily harm or death?

Impression? I know dam well that an unarmed woman is rarely much of a threat to an armed and ready man but he is welcome to claim otherwise in a court of law and be judged accordingly and the prosecution must try to restrain his laughter while he is doing so.

She was part of a violent mob that got numerous people killed that day.

Context matters. I don’t think he has much to worry about.

Can you link us up to the threads you started condemning the BLM and Antifa riots that resulted in many more deaths?

No?

Then STFU, hypocrite.

 

[Lastamender]

By an unarmed woman? I do not see that as a death threat is anyway shape or form. A death threat, fear for your life, is when deadly force should be used. That did not happen.

Was she alone?

Unarmed is unarmed. You people have already justified fraud, are you going for manslaughter too?

Are you under the impression that an unarmed mob (not counting the blunt instruments many of them were carrying) is incapable of causing bodily harm or death?

Impression? I know dam well that an unarmed woman is rarely much of a threat to an armed and ready man but he is welcome to claim otherwise in a court of law and be judged accordingly and the prosecution must try to restrain his laughter while he is doing so.

She was part of a violent mob that got numerous people killed that day.

Context matters. I don’t think he has much to worry about.

And the 30 that died in the summer were just fun and games? Shut your hypocritical drama queen mouth.

 

[lantern2814]

You lie. There were riots and all sorts of problems (including in Washington DC) on Trump’s Inauguration Day. Keep lying.

Yeah, anarchists being anarchists.

We aren’t anarchists.

Those were YOUR side asshole. Damn you are a fucking idiot. Your stupidity is glaring.

 

[colfax_m]

You lie. There were riots and all sorts of problems (including in Washington DC) on Trump’s Inauguration Day. Keep lying.

Yeah, anarchists being anarchists.

We aren’t anarchists.

Those were YOUR side asshole. Damn you are a fucking idiot. Your stupidity is glaring.

Anarchists aren’t on our side.

Do you know anything about anarchists?

 

[lantern2814]

Nope! They are under investigation for being TRUMP sympathizers...

Trump "sympathizers"? Nothing authoritarian or fascist about that....right?
When did we turn into the CCP? Or do you imagine it's some sort of crime to
politically support Trump?

The word sympathizer was me, being kind in describing the Capitol police that could have nefariously let the protesters in....

I could have said some of trump insurrectionists in the capitol police.... are being investigated.... but thought calling them insurrectionists was not fair, because the investigation in to them, is not complete.... thus trump sympathizers...not co conspirator insurrectionists....at least not yet.

200 people broke into the Capitol, incited and whipped into a mob by Antifa & BLM who were aided by Capitol Police - less than 200 were Trump supporters. It was a staged event, a 'trap', so Democrats could launch another bogus Impeachment Pelosi admitted herself is politically partisan and intended to eliminate Trump as a threat in 2024 and beyond.

It was also intended to justify calling ALL Conservatives and Trump Supporters 'terrorists' and call for them to be rounded up and reprogrammed / put in re-education camps.

And socialists ignore Antifa/BLM violence that has caused BILLIONS of dollars in damage & How the current VP incited this real insurrection she declared 'must continue'...which it has.

Antifa claims are Russian propaganda being pushed in right wing media, is what the administration's cyber security and fbi said on the news....

Except for the little fact that your Antifa pals are on video ADMITTING to their actions. Of course you ignore that like good little sheep.

 

[colfax_m]

By an unarmed woman? I do not see that as a death threat is anyway shape or form. A death threat, fear for your life, is when deadly force should be used. That did not happen.

Was she alone?

Unarmed is unarmed. You people have already justified fraud, are you going for manslaughter too?

Are you under the impression that an unarmed mob (not counting the blunt instruments many of them were carrying) is incapable of causing bodily harm or death?

Impression? I know dam well that an unarmed woman is rarely much of a threat to an armed and ready man but he is welcome to claim otherwise in a court of law and be judged accordingly and the prosecution must try to restrain his laughter while he is doing so.

She was part of a violent mob that got numerous people killed that day.

Context matters. I don’t think he has much to worry about.

And the 30 that died in the summer were just fun and games? Shut your hypocritical drama queen mouth.

At least they weren’t murdering cops.

This mob was out for blood.

 

[Nostra]

You lie. There were riots and all sorts of problems (including in Washington DC) on Trump’s Inauguration Day. Keep lying.

Yeah, anarchists being anarchists.

We aren’t anarchists.

Those were YOUR side asshole. Damn you are a fucking idiot. Your stupidity is glaring.

Anarchists aren’t on our side.

Do you know anything about anarchists?

BLM and Antifa are on your side, Dumbfuck.

 

[Nostra]

By an unarmed woman? I do not see that as a death threat is anyway shape or form. A death threat, fear for your life, is when deadly force should be used. That did not happen.

Was she alone?

Unarmed is unarmed. You people have already justified fraud, are you going for manslaughter too?

Are you under the impression that an unarmed mob (not counting the blunt instruments many of them were carrying) is incapable of causing bodily harm or death?

Impression? I know dam well that an unarmed woman is rarely much of a threat to an armed and ready man but he is welcome to claim otherwise in a court of law and be judged accordingly and the prosecution must try to restrain his laughter while he is doing so.

She was part of a violent mob that got numerous people killed that day.

Context matters. I don’t think he has much to worry about.

And the 30 that died in the summer were just fun and games? Shut your hypocritical drama queen mouth.

At least they weren’t murdering cops.

This mob was out for blood.

You are a lying sack of shit.

Here is a list from early in the riots. assface.

12 Police Officers Have Been Shot During the George Floyd Protests—Here Are Their Names

News of Floyd’s death prompted many to peacefully protest police brutality and violence, but spurred others to commit acts of looting, rioting and violence against police officers.

news.yahoo.com

 

[Nostra]

I predict Fuckface colfax_m will ignore the post above.

 

[Lastamender]

By an unarmed woman? I do not see that as a death threat is anyway shape or form. A death threat, fear for your life, is when deadly force should be used. That did not happen.

Was she alone?

Unarmed is unarmed. You people have already justified fraud, are you going for manslaughter too?

Are you under the impression that an unarmed mob (not counting the blunt instruments many of them were carrying) is incapable of causing bodily harm or death?

Impression? I know dam well that an unarmed woman is rarely much of a threat to an armed and ready man but he is welcome to claim otherwise in a court of law and be judged accordingly and the prosecution must try to restrain his laughter while he is doing so.

She was part of a violent mob that got numerous people killed that day.

Context matters. I don’t think he has much to worry about.

And the 30 that died in the summer were just fun and games? Shut your hypocritical drama queen mouth.

At least they weren’t murdering cops.

This mob was out for blood.

The Hell they were not. A retired policeman was murdered in St Louis and a cop was shot in the neck in NY. Anymore lies?

 

[Care4all]

Nope! They are under investigation for being TRUMP sympathizers...

Trump "sympathizers"? Nothing authoritarian or fascist about that....right?
When did we turn into the CCP? Or do you imagine it's some sort of crime to
politically support Trump?

The word sympathizer was me, being kind in describing the Capitol police that could have nefariously let the protesters in....

I could have said some of trump insurrectionists in the capitol police.... are being investigated.... but thought calling them insurrectionists was not fair, because the investigation in to them, is not complete.... thus trump sympathizers...not co conspirator insurrectionists....at least not yet.

200 people broke into the Capitol, incited and whipped into a mob by Antifa & BLM who were aided by Capitol Police - less than 200 were Trump supporters. It was a staged event, a 'trap', so Democrats could launch another bogus Impeachment Pelosi admitted herself is politically partisan and intended to eliminate Trump as a threat in 2024 and beyond.

It was also intended to justify calling ALL Conservatives and Trump Supporters 'terrorists' and call for them to be rounded up and reprogrammed / put in re-education camps.

And socialists ignore Antifa/BLM violence that has caused BILLIONS of dollars in damage & How the current VP incited this real insurrection she declared 'must continue'...which it has.

Antifa claims are Russian propaganda being pushed in right wing media, is what the administration's cyber security and fbi said on the news....

Except for the little fact that your Antifa pals are on video ADMITTING to their actions. Of course you ignore that like good little sheep.

Yep, so far just 1 guy named Sullivan was at the riot, inside the capitol, that has been arrested.... that claimed he was an activist.

The hundred others were Trumpists that were arrested.

Facts and evidence, matters....

 

[colfax_m]

By an unarmed woman? I do not see that as a death threat is anyway shape or form. A death threat, fear for your life, is when deadly force should be used. That did not happen.

Was she alone?

Unarmed is unarmed. You people have already justified fraud, are you going for manslaughter too?

Are you under the impression that an unarmed mob (not counting the blunt instruments many of them were carrying) is incapable of causing bodily harm or death?

Impression? I know dam well that an unarmed woman is rarely much of a threat to an armed and ready man but he is welcome to claim otherwise in a court of law and be judged accordingly and the prosecution must try to restrain his laughter while he is doing so.

She was part of a violent mob that got numerous people killed that day.

Context matters. I don’t think he has much to worry about.

And the 30 that died in the summer were just fun and games? Shut your hypocritical drama queen mouth.

At least they weren’t murdering cops.

This mob was out for blood.

You are a lying sack of shit.

Here is a list from early in the riots. assface.

12 Police Officers Have Been Shot During the George Floyd Protests—Here Are Their Names

News of Floyd’s death prompted many to peacefully protest police brutality and violence, but spurred others to commit acts of looting, rioting and violence against police officers.

news.yahoo.com

I said murdered. Half of those had no connection to any riot and those that did survived.

 

[Rambunctious]

If they can impeach Trump now...they can impeach Bush and even a dead Reagan.....and maybe you or me.....or the next outsider that wants America to be great.....this is a very dangerous game DC is playing....

 

[colfax_m]

The Hell they were not. A retired policeman was murdered in St Louis and a cop was shot in the neck in NY. Anymore lies?

A retired policeman wasn’t on duty. Who was shot in NY?

 

[Dogbiscuit]

They have zero constitutional power or right to do so
Trying T on fake charges is only a “ Soviet show trial “

These articles say that Senator Leahy will preside.

Sen. Leahy to Preside Over Impeachment, Not Chief Justice Roberts

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the longest-serving Senate Democrat, will preside over former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial instead of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, The Hill reported.

www.newsmax.com

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the longest-serving Senate Democrat, will preside over former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial instead of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, The Hill reported.

Leahy, not Roberts, to preside over impeachment trial

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts will not preside over former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial, which is scheduled to begin in earnest on Feb. 8.

thehill.com

A clear violation of the Constitution.

This recent article has 29 GOP senators, and possibly more, that agree with you.

Epoch Times: 29 GOP Senators Oppose Trump Trial

House Democrats plan to walk the impeachment charge against former President Donald Trump to the Senate on Monday evening, but multiple members of the GOP in the Upper Chamber have already come out against holding a trial.

www.newsmax.com

The Epoch Times reported Monday, 29 GOP senators have spoken out against holding a trial, arguing it is unconstitutional to try to convict a former office holder, or a waste of time.

 

[Lastamender]

The Hell they were not. A retired policeman was murdered in St Louis and a cop was shot in the neck in NY. Anymore lies?

A retired policeman wasn’t on duty. Who was shot in NY?

A cop, can you read?

 

[Care4all]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

 

[Lastamender]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.