Seahawks SUCK !!!!

[rightwinger]

Too bad stats don't win games....

Fact is a 6-4 record is slightly above average at this point in the season...

9 NFC teams have a worse record. (4 are in the NFC South!)
5 have better records (Detroit, Green Bay, Philly, Dallas, Arizona)
1 team (SF) is tied with them at 6-4

...plenty can change. Maybe they'll go on a tear and start winning the close ones?

Let's look at the schedule....

Sun, Nov 23	vs	View attachment 34134Cardinals	1:05 PM
Thu, Nov 27	@	49ers	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 7	@	Eagles	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 14	vs	49ers	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 21	@	Cardinals	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 28	vs	Rams	1:25 PM

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

They'll need to win at least 4 of these games to have a chance at a wild card.
Good luck!!

I think the Seahawks can get a wildcard with a 10-6 record if three of those four wins are a sweep of SF and a win in Philly

I'm starting to have my doubts with our starting center out again. The backup is just too inexperienced to call blocking assignments and consistantly hike the ball accurately to Wilson. With the Hawks depending on the "run first" game plan I don't see the rest of the season going any better than the last half of the 4th qtr last Sunday in KC. Unger our so called "pro bowl" center has been a major dissappointment this season serving up 2 3/4 games. He needs to be cut as soon as possible and replaced by someone not so injury prone. Unger was no more dependable last season either. Why Carroll and Schneider can't see the importance of a dependable center is beyond me.

Want to compare notes with Arizona fans who lost their starting QB?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Too bad stats don't win games....

Fact is a 6-4 record is slightly above average at this point in the season...

9 NFC teams have a worse record. (4 are in the NFC South!)
5 have better records (Detroit, Green Bay, Philly, Dallas, Arizona)
1 team (SF) is tied with them at 6-4

...plenty can change. Maybe they'll go on a tear and start winning the close ones?

Let's look at the schedule....

Sun, Nov 23	vs	View attachment 34134Cardinals	1:05 PM
Thu, Nov 27	@	49ers	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 7	@	Eagles	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 14	vs	49ers	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 21	@	Cardinals	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 28	vs	Rams	1:25 PM

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

They'll need to win at least 4 of these games to have a chance at a wild card.
Good luck!!

I think the Seahawks can get a wildcard with a 10-6 record if three of those four wins are a sweep of SF and a win in Philly

I'm starting to have my doubts with our starting center out again. The backup is just too inexperienced to call blocking assignments and consistantly hike the ball accurately to Wilson. With the Hawks depending on the "run first" game plan I don't see the rest of the season going any better than the last half of the 4th qtr last Sunday in KC. Unger our so called "pro bowl" center has been a major dissappointment this season serving up 2 3/4 games. He needs to be cut as soon as possible and replaced by someone not so injury prone. Unger was no more dependable last season either. Why Carroll and Schneider can't see the importance of a dependable center is beyond me.

Want to compare notes with Arizona fans who lost their starting QB?

huggy is in denial that the hawks are not playing with any effort that he always has to use injurys as an excuse. funny how arizona loses their starting quarterback amongst many other key critical injurys that made it look like their season was done before that yet they keep winning though.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Too bad stats don't win games....

Fact is a 6-4 record is slightly above average at this point in the season...

9 NFC teams have a worse record. (4 are in the NFC South!)
5 have better records (Detroit, Green Bay, Philly, Dallas, Arizona)
1 team (SF) is tied with them at 6-4

...plenty can change. Maybe they'll go on a tear and start winning the close ones?

Let's look at the schedule....

Sun, Nov 23	vs	View attachment 34134Cardinals	1:05 PM
Thu, Nov 27	@	49ers	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 7	@	Eagles	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 14	vs	49ers	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 21	@	Cardinals	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 28	vs	Rams	1:25 PM

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

They'll need to win at least 4 of these games to have a chance at a wild card.
Good luck!!

No kidding! The Hawks are really up against a wall now. They had several opportunities to put that game away and came up short. They have no one to blame but themselves.

carrol just like in the chargers game is to blame for this one along with the fact the defense did not show up to play to no surprise.i liked the call of going for it on fourth down both times but the calls itself is what I had a problem with.

that was stupid to try and pound it in with Lynch against a defense like that.they were going to be ready for it.should have had wilson do a bootleg.then they went with the SAME play after the chiefs called a timeout and they had already had a chance to look at that previous play.sheesh,dumb.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Too bad stats don't win games....

Fact is a 6-4 record is slightly above average at this point in the season...

9 NFC teams have a worse record. (4 are in the NFC South!)
5 have better records (Detroit, Green Bay, Philly, Dallas, Arizona)
1 team (SF) is tied with them at 6-4

...plenty can change. Maybe they'll go on a tear and start winning the close ones?

Let's look at the schedule....

Sun, Nov 23	vs	View attachment 34134Cardinals	1:05 PM
Thu, Nov 27	@	49ers	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 7	@	Eagles	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 14	vs	49ers	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 21	@	Cardinals	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 28	vs	Rams	1:25 PM

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

They'll need to win at least 4 of these games to have a chance at a wild card.
Good luck!!

the cardinals went 11-5 last year and missed the playoffs,only chance the hawks would have of making it NOW is to run the table and win them all and thats not going to happen,not the way that defense has played all year long not getting any pressure on the quaretback.

 

[Montrovant]

Huh? What does rightwinger have to do with my coment?

dude you said he lied,i didnt see anywhere where he did this rare time.

No...I did not. Are you having a reading skills deficiency moment? I responded to Popshisgoo's post.

"The Chiefs won the battle of the lines, both offensive and defensive"

That statement is bullshit. If you don't think so go over to ESPN's recap of the game and see ALL the catagories the Hawks beat the Chiefs.

His statement is a lie even if he believes it to be true.

The Chiefs were fortunate to stop the Hawks on three fourth down plays out of 72 total plays the Hawks had the ball. The Chiefs only had the ball around 35 plays.

His statement is wrong, stupid and factually a lie.

If you don't understand THAT then your process of deduction is malfunctioning.

Huggy, I know you lost, but right to calling me names, you are on the same tier as you butt buddy, 911. Have him spoon with you, you might feel better.

The Chiefs were fortunate to stop the Hawks on three fourth down plays out of 72 total plays the Hawks had the ball

That, in itself, is enough to win most games

I agree that a handfull of plays is what usually dictates the winner ...especially when the final score is less than a touchdown difference.

The loss of the Seahawk's first string center was crucial to the inability for the Hawks to score on the goal line and not able to get the 4th down conversion late in the 4th qtr.

Next to the QB IMHO the Center is the most important player on the offense. He calls the blocking schemes and is the lead blocker on most running plays within the hashmarks. I think Carroll puts too much faith in the "next man up" theory when calling plays in crucial situations. Our last two losses were directly due to inexperienced players being asked to do too much having just been inserted into the field of play after the player ahead of them goes down. In St Louis inexperienced players allowed the blocked punt and the fake FG to take place. We should have won in St Louis easily had these "not so ready to step in" players been put in positions that swung the game so directly in the Rams favor on two plays. I blame coaching for not placing better more experienced players in the game or at the least instructing replacements on what to watch out for in crucial situations. There is no excuse for not having a competant back up center prepared to go into a game at the drop of a hat.

The Hawks offense has been erratic all year. The fact that Jamaal Charles ran roughshod through the defense seems more troubling to me. The loss of Mebane looked pretty important against the Chiefs. Sure, Charles is a great back, but he hasn't been getting huge yardage totals this year. Neither one of the teams did a great job stopping the run, based on the stats, but it's a bigger deal for Seattle I think.

I'll agree with rightwinger though that if the Hawks sweep the Niners and beat Philly, there's a good chance they get a wildcard.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

charles ran all over the hawks defense cause they are playing with no heart or passion this year as is neither the offensive line,they all got complacent and stopped trying.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

bad news for your seahawks huggy.Im sure you have heard this news.I normally would call it nothing but a rumor but it makes sense.so that they can give wilson a big contract next year they will let Lynch go.I never thought they would let golden tate go or percy harvin but they did so they'll let him go as well. its too bad.I have a hard time seeing him in another uniform other than a seahawks one. well if they dont want him,give him to my 2015 LA RAMS.!!!! I'll take him.

Seahawks plan to move on from Lynch after 14 season - NFL.com

 

[Papageorgio]

bad news for your seahawks huggy.Im sure you have heard this news.I normally would call it nothing but a rumor but it makes sense.so that they can give wilson a big contract next year they will let Lynch go.I never thought they would let golden tate go or percy harvin but they did so they'll let him go as well. its too bad.I have a hard time seeing him in another uniform other than a seahawks one. well if they dont want him,give him to my 2015 LA RAMS.!!!! I'll take him.

Seahawks plan to move on from Lynch after 14 season - NFL.com

Only three weeks behind in this story.

 

[B. Kidd]

Too bad stats don't win games....

Fact is a 6-4 record is slightly above average at this point in the season...

9 NFC teams have a worse record. (4 are in the NFC South!)
5 have better records (Detroit, Green Bay, Philly, Dallas, Arizona)
1 team (SF) is tied with them at 6-4

...plenty can change. Maybe they'll go on a tear and start winning the close ones?

Let's look at the schedule....

Sun, Nov 23	vs	View attachment 34134Cardinals	1:05 PM
Thu, Nov 27	@	49ers	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 7	@	Eagles	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 14	vs	49ers	1:25 PM
Sun, Dec 21	@	Cardinals	5:30 PM
Sun, Dec 28	vs	Rams	1:25 PM

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

They'll need to win at least 4 of these games to have a chance at a wild card.
Good luck!!

I think the Seahawks can get a wildcard with a 10-6 record if three of those four wins are a sweep of SF and a win in Philly

Beyond beating the Cowgirlz, I'd like nothing better then the Eagles putting a nail in Seattles coffin.

 

[HUGGY]

dude you said he lied,i didnt see anywhere where he did this rare time.

No...I did not. Are you having a reading skills deficiency moment? I responded to Popshisgoo's post.

"The Chiefs won the battle of the lines, both offensive and defensive"

That statement is bullshit. If you don't think so go over to ESPN's recap of the game and see ALL the catagories the Hawks beat the Chiefs.

His statement is a lie even if he believes it to be true.

The Chiefs were fortunate to stop the Hawks on three fourth down plays out of 72 total plays the Hawks had the ball. The Chiefs only had the ball around 35 plays.

His statement is wrong, stupid and factually a lie.

If you don't understand THAT then your process of deduction is malfunctioning.

Huggy, I know you lost, but right to calling me names, you are on the same tier as you butt buddy, 911. Have him spoon with you, you might feel better.

The Chiefs were fortunate to stop the Hawks on three fourth down plays out of 72 total plays the Hawks had the ball

That, in itself, is enough to win most games

I agree that a handfull of plays is what usually dictates the winner ...especially when the final score is less than a touchdown difference.

The loss of the Seahawk's first string center was crucial to the inability for the Hawks to score on the goal line and not able to get the 4th down conversion late in the 4th qtr.

Next to the QB IMHO the Center is the most important player on the offense. He calls the blocking schemes and is the lead blocker on most running plays within the hashmarks. I think Carroll puts too much faith in the "next man up" theory when calling plays in crucial situations. Our last two losses were directly due to inexperienced players being asked to do too much having just been inserted into the field of play after the player ahead of them goes down. In St Louis inexperienced players allowed the blocked punt and the fake FG to take place. We should have won in St Louis easily had these "not so ready to step in" players been put in positions that swung the game so directly in the Rams favor on two plays. I blame coaching for not placing better more experienced players in the game or at the least instructing replacements on what to watch out for in crucial situations. There is no excuse for not having a competant back up center prepared to go into a game at the drop of a hat.

The Hawks offense has been erratic all year. The fact that Jamaal Charles ran roughshod through the defense seems more troubling to me. The loss of Mebane looked pretty important against the Chiefs. Sure, Charles is a great back, but he hasn't been getting huge yardage totals this year. Neither one of the teams did a great job stopping the run, based on the stats, but it's a bigger deal for Seattle I think.

I'll agree with rightwinger though that if the Hawks sweep the Niners and beat Philly, there's a good chance they get a wildcard.

The Chiefs didn't run up the gut against the Hawks. They ran around the edges. Mebain's loss though important wasn't an important factor aagainst the Chiefs. The Hawks defense is not what lost them the game. It was their lack of scoring ability in the red zone when they had ample opportunity.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

the thing that bodes well for the future of the seahawks is that in all the games they have lost,they were all very close games and they had a chance to win it in the very end.

its not like the raiders or the buccaneers who after they were in the superbowl that one year they both imploded after that and had disasterous losing seasons losing many games in blowout losses.same with Baltimore.after they won it,they had a losing record the next year and lost many games in blowout losses and still have not recovered.

with this last close loss to the chiefs,that could bode well for them.assuming they win the rest of their home games,i could see them stealing one from the niners or eagles on the road and finish no worse than 10- 6 which will be the third winning season in a row since the Wilson/carrol era began.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

and yeah 9 and 7 is a winning record as well but 9-7 just sounds mediocre,not that good.10 qnd 6 sounds so much better.9-7 sounds like you're just an average team where with 10 and 6 it sounds like your a good team.big difference between the two,so the hawks need to steal one of those road games.

 

[Toro]

The idea that Seattle was going to go 19-0 was retarded.

However, they are good enough to go into Lambeau and beat the Packers, who are probably the team to beat in the NFC at the moment.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The idea that Seattle was going to go 19-0 was retarded.

However, they are good enough to go into Lambeau and beat the Packers, who are probably the team to beat in the NFC at the moment.

No the idea that you refuse to ever admit when you have been proven wrong by refusing to look at an opposing viewpoint different than your own in conspiracys is what is retarded.

had the seahawks not got complacent and played with passion and heart like they did last year,it would have been VERY realistic to say they had an excellent chance of going undefeated.

who could have predicted they would get complacent and lose passion and heart? not everybody in the world is a mind reader.

The media suppressed a fact that nobody knew about either over the entire off season leading up to pre season games that percy harvin was getting into fights with teammates.

had they let that be known to the public,no way in hell would I have ever predicted they MIGHT go undefeated knowing the guy that replaced his favorite go to receiver they lost in the off season was a cancer for them in the locker room.thats the LAMESTREAM media for you though,always suppressing facts from the public.

oh until that defense does something it has not done all year long since the packers game,put pressure on the quarterback and play with heart and desire same goes for the offensive line,thats just as unrealitistic to believe they can go into green bay and win.they could if they decided to play the way they are capable of,but this whole year they have not even tried to play the way they are capable of.they are just going through the motions.

which AGAIN is something I could never have predicted.

 

[Toro]

Are they 10-0?

If not, STFU.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Are they 10-0?

If not, STFU.

this from a chickenshit coward who runs off with his tail between his legs when challenenged to debunk facts of government conspiracys. talk about someone who needs to STFU.being a coward running away from trying to refute facts and saying the official version is correct,you need to look in the mirror when telling someone they need to STFU you stupid ****.

 

[Montrovant]

Why do I feel like I've seen those exact sentences before......

 

[HUGGY]

The idea that Seattle was going to go 19-0 was retarded.

However, they are good enough to go into Lambeau and beat the Packers, who are probably the team to beat in the NFC at the moment.

It's not retarded for fans to wish the best for their team.

OBVIOUSLY a 19-0 prediction is way out there on anyone's scale. It's never been done.

Still ... when everyone is 0-0 a fan can dream can't they?

 

[rightwinger]

The idea that Seattle was going to go 19-0 was retarded.

However, they are good enough to go into Lambeau and beat the Packers, who are probably the team to beat in the NFC at the moment.

It's not retarded for fans to wish the best for their team.

OBVIOUSLY a 19-0 prediction is way out there on anyone's scale. It's never been done.

Still ... when everyone is 0-0 a fan can dream can't they?

Not only can you dream but you can start threads on it.

If you don't go undefeated but still finish 14-2 and win a SB, you can still hold your head high
But if you don't even make the playoffs after predicting an undefeated season.....you gotta run off and hide somewhere

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The idea that Seattle was going to go 19-0 was retarded.

However, they are good enough to go into Lambeau and beat the Packers, who are probably the team to beat in the NFC at the moment.

It's not retarded for fans to wish the best for their team.

OBVIOUSLY a 19-0 prediction is way out there on anyone's scale. It's never been done.

Still ... when everyone is 0-0 a fan can dream can't they?

Not only can you dream but you can start threads on it.

If you don't go undefeated but still finish 14-2 and win a SB, you can still hold your head high
But if you don't even make the playoffs after predicting an undefeated season.....you gotta run off and hide somewhere

since nobody here ever predicted an undefeated season,you wont find anybody running off. its amazing how so many people around here such as yourself have reading comprehension problems and alzheimers diseace since no matter how many times I post the evidence that I only guaranteed they would repeat but never guaranteed they would go undefeated seems to always fall on deaf ears around here.

see the thread title there? it says probably.

Seahawks will repeat AND probably go undefeated.this is why. US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


you seahawk haters only see what you want to see of course so I have no doubt you don't see what this thread says.

as I have said a hundred times just to watch it go through one ear and out the other,you might try and look up what the word PROBABLY means,probably is not a gurantee like will is.

I have already admitted I goofed and was wrong on my prediction I made where I DID guarantee they would repeat.

see I can admit when I am wrong.something YOU might actually consider trying to do once in your life.