Well, yes. The slaughtered animals are eaten. You both seem to believe that becoming holy or separate as God is holy can be attained by eating or abstaining from certain food. Derp.
What's the difference?
It is a rational argument. The subject of the term sanctuary of God is either about room in a building or Divine providence just as Kashrut is either about food that is eaten or teaching that is received whether clean or unclean. In both cases it cannot be about both so the question is what is a rational conclusion. What goes into the mouth can not defile a person but what goes into the mind does so then the subject of Kahrut is teaching not food. Apply that same reasoning to the term "Sanctuary of God" in light of a more rational meaning "Divine providence" and the only rational conclusion is that it cannot be made by human hands.
The Law is the wall of the temple. The sanctuary of God is within those boundaries and is only accessible to those who comply with the Laws demands in the only way that fulfills the promise of abundant blessings and eternal life in the realm of God here and now on earth, the reward of the righteous.
The eternal life promised by God for complying with the instruction in the Law is about comprehension which is not present in nor can be made by human hands but can be given and received through words that nourish like manna from heaven - teaching from God.
One cannot comply with the literal interpretation of the law that prohibits eating the flesh of swine that do not ruminate without violating the deeper implications of the exact same law because the teaching that the subject of kashrut is about food is in and of itself the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate.
The point of holiness is not 'becoming G-d',
and abstaining from foods, is not 'eating G-d'.
Severe cognitive dissociation is not a rational argument,
you can't write a single sentence without a strawman,
paired with circular reasoning.
The logical conclusion of using such reasoning - "not murder"= must murder,
because if I give you the salt when you asked me to pass it to you, it's the
opposite of what you asked...since taste "cannot be passed by human
hands"...so to give you salt I must not give you the salt.
What I meant by trying to "make G-d irrelevant",
is exactly that pseudo-Greek buffoonery.
Really all it takes is a stick on the head,
and suddenly words have meaning.