whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,280
- 6,118
- 245
And 00018 18SEP06 „frnknvstn„ #18 women will have complete 100% control over their bodies if roe v wade were overturned [I hope it is not but really no concern of mine]
08701-a 23MAY03 Ā„ hadit Ā„ #8,701 {to:
08,667} āA fertilized egg is a human being at the very earliest stage of life. Biology makes that clear, whether you value that life or not
08713-a 23MAY06 NFBW #8,713
08716 23MAY07 Ā„ Frankeneinstein Ā„ #8,716 {to: 08,713} āOh look, another note from NFBWā
08717 23MAY07 Ā„ beagle9 Ā„ {to: 08,716} āIs he trying to bore us to deathā
23MAY07 NFBW {to: 08716} You are referring to my post Ā„frnknvstnĀ„ therefore, I must assume that youāve seen the questions that are contained in it
I understand from your post 00,018 „vfrnknvstn„ from September 2018 (see above) that you had no concern if Roe v. Wade would be overturned or not. Therefore you cannot be concerned or opposed to my view on the matter whether or not we as living breathing human beings need to place value of life on the unborn prior to their development to viability roughy at 24 weeks of gestation.
It should be then that Ā„beagle9Ā„ and Ā„HaditāsĀ„ self proclaimed moral superiority based on their value of unborn life at every fertilization of a human egg cell is as much an attack on you as it is on me for being evil and morally depraved for not agreeing with their extreme self-proclaimed moral superiority.
Why do you indulge them Ā„ Frankeneinstein Ā„ in their religious extremist beliefs.?
08701-a 23MAY03 Ā„ hadit Ā„ #8,701 {to:
08,667} āA fertilized egg is a human being at the very earliest stage of life. Biology makes that clear, whether you value that life or not
08713-a 23MAY06 NFBW #8,713
āref 230516^a value of human life begins at consistent preemie survival when interactions with non-related human beings in a society beginsā
Why are you interested in a pregnant personās condition physically, morally, ethically financially or religiously Ā„hvdvtĀ„ just because a private matter of egg fertilization has taken place in her physical being? What impact or harm is it to you?08716 23MAY07 Ā„ Frankeneinstein Ā„ #8,716 {to: 08,713} āOh look, another note from NFBWā
08717 23MAY07 Ā„ beagle9 Ā„ {to: 08,716} āIs he trying to bore us to deathā
23MAY07 NFBW {to: 08716} You are referring to my post Ā„frnknvstnĀ„ therefore, I must assume that youāve seen the questions that are contained in it
I understand from your post 00,018 „vfrnknvstn„ from September 2018 (see above) that you had no concern if Roe v. Wade would be overturned or not. Therefore you cannot be concerned or opposed to my view on the matter whether or not we as living breathing human beings need to place value of life on the unborn prior to their development to viability roughy at 24 weeks of gestation.
It should be then that Ā„beagle9Ā„ and Ā„HaditāsĀ„ self proclaimed moral superiority based on their value of unborn life at every fertilization of a human egg cell is as much an attack on you as it is on me for being evil and morally depraved for not agreeing with their extreme self-proclaimed moral superiority.
Why do you indulge them Ā„ Frankeneinstein Ā„ in their religious extremist beliefs.?
Last edited: