08,633 23MAY02 ¥
Frankeneinstein ¥
#8,633 {to: 08,624} “That's also what someone who is pro-choice but not guilty of group think [that you pretend you are not a part of] is described as by the rest of the group.
08670-a 23MAY04 NFBW #8,670 {to: 08,633} No. my group’s thinking is backed by our Constitution. (See 230504^a
above) We oppose an elected predominantly white anti/choice Trump supporting Christian majority body of lawmakers passing laws that deprive women of their Fourth AMENDMENT Right: (see 08,604
above in bold)
08670-b 23MAY04 NFBW #8,670 {to: 08,633}
“It is the right of a woman to be secure in her person from unreasonable government seizure of her body if a sperm cell from a male penetrates an egg cell she was born with in her possession.
08677 23MAY04 ¥
Frankeneinstein ¥
#8,677 {to: 08,670} That's like saying 2a exempts the taking of a life with a weapon...why don't ya just start referring to surgical tools as arms and come at it from that direction...it makes just as much sense as your interpretation.
08680-a 23MAY04 NFBW
#8,680 {to: 08,677} “More irrational absurdity from ¥frnknvstn¥ because 4a does not and cannot exempt a pregnant woman if she were to kill an (out of her body) person(s) that has met a live birth requirement by taking a first breath of life outside the womb.”
08680-b 23MAY04 NFBW
#8,680 {to: 08,677} If you do want a second amendment analogy against the fourth amendment, I have explained {
a woman would be using self defense to employ a medical professional to perform surgery on her to save her life from the human living organism.that has attached itself to her uterus.}
08680-c 23MAY04 NFBW
#8,680 {to: 08,677} Bottom line, Frank it’s still none of your business or my business or the governments business, { or church business except for it’s own parishioners.}
So why are you working so hard to make it your business to cause harm to women, who experience an unwanted pregnancy.?
08682-
m 23MAY04 ¥
Frankeneinstein ¥ #8,682 {to: 08,680} “
the constitution spells out the the right to bear arms but there is no provision in our constitution on abortion.”
08686-g 23MAY04 ¥
Monk-Eye ¥
#8,686 {to: 08,682-m} “A state is comprised of citizens on whose behalf a state interests lay , and a state does not exist without its citizens , and a citizen and its constitutional protections are instantiated with a live birth requirement , by us 14th amendment ; and , therefore , by equitable doctrine , a live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen
08686-h 23MAY04 ¥
Monk-Eye ¥
#8,686 {to: 08,682-m} “Consequently , states are prohibited from protecting a wright to life of any which has not met a live birth requirement to receive it , that would have included a wright to life , and therefore states are prohibited from prohibiting abortion , which is not an enumerated wright in us constitution , however it is a wright that is retained by the people .”
23MAY05 NFBW -a {to: 08682-m} When you ¥frnknvnstn¥ wrote ““
the constitution spells out the the right to bear arms but there is no provision in our constitution on abortion.” (see above) it is an absurd point because as previously explained in
08670-b (see above)
“It is the right of a woman to be secure in her person from unreasonable government seizure of her body”
When a government through enforcement of a law the coerces a nine month gestation of a living human organism that has attached itself to a woman’s uterus, thus becoming part of her body, it is
the right of a woman to be secure in her person from actual and perceived forthcoming personal harm or death to terminate and severe her relationship and obligations to said organism as an unenumerated right under the general concept and protection of 4A.
I will refer you to what ¥mvnkvyv¥ wrote which you persistently continue to sidestep from 08686-h (see above)
“Consequently , states are prohibited from protecting a wright to life of any which has not met a live birth requirement to receive it , that would have included a wright to life , and therefore states are prohibited from prohibiting abortion , which is not an enumerated wright in us constitution , however it is a wright that is retained by the people .”
