Trump signs Executive Order which will greatly impact Canadian exporters into America: "STRENGTHENING CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT"

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
45,145
Reaction score
44,211
Points
3,605
This will force Canadian companies to be transparent, no more easy arbitrage importing from low wage nations and then into the U.S under a false pretense.

The ownership details (especially if foreign owned), supply chain details (I presume this means no more "imported by ABC Inc, Toronto, Ontario, the U.S wants to know the source of manufacturing), CTPAT validation by US customs among other issues.

Do not blame me, I am just the Messenger. Long destroyed and still being persecuted.

Save some of us man. Do NOT believe what you are being told, there are two sides to the story and they desperately do not want the full details of mine known...



By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. Purpose. Customs enforcement is essential to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. Effective customs enforcement prevents the importation of unlawful and dangerous goods; ensures importers of record (IORs) are correctly identified and accountable for duties owed; and guarantees compliance with numerous Federal laws, including laws governing forced labor, rules of origin, origin marking, intellectual property, revenue collection, and product safety.

Customs reform is long overdue. Systemic inefficiencies, loopholes, insufficient enforcement mechanisms, and outdated processes have created opportunities for malign actors to evade Federal law. Examples of noncompliance include undervaluing imports, withholding critical information about IORs and the goods being imported, and avoiding payment of duties through various arrangements and schemes. These actions threaten national security, undermine foreign relations, disadvantage domestic businesses, and harm Americans.

The United States must strengthen its customs enforcement through comprehensive reform, including through agency action and legislation. Such reform should focus on protecting national security, promoting lawful trade, ensuring the timely collection of duties, modernizing systems and processes, bolstering compliance mechanisms, increasing transparency, and protecting Americans and the domestic economy.

Sec. 2. Importers of Record. (a) Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 66, 1484, 1498, 1623, 1624, and 4320, and any other applicable law, take steps to revise importer eligibility regulations, guidance, and policies consistent with the policy of this order. These revisions shall include:

(i) requiring that an IOR maintain at all times a minimum level of tangible domestic assets, bonding, or both, as determined by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to be necessary to ensure compliance with U.S. customs and trade laws, and increasing the minimum required bond coverage for an IOR;

(ii) requiring that an IOR be designated and reported to CBP, and that a bond, or sufficient tangible domestic assets, or both, be required, for all formal entries under 19 U.S.C. 1484 and informal entries under regulations promulgated pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1498; and
 
I understand the purpose.

What I don't like is that once again, he is using National Security Threat to claim he can legally do this without congress....
 
I understand the purpose.

What I don't like is that once again, he is using National Security Threat to claim he can legally do this without congress....
Most nations cite national security behind closed doors when outfits engage in nefarious and unknown tactics against the U.S and their interests. Of this you can be sure. At least this is being done overtly with a press release and all.
 
Most nations cite national security behind closed doors when outfits engage in nefarious and unknown tactics against the U.S and their interests. Of this you can be sure. At least this is being done overtly with a press release and all.
This is what? The 100th time or so in the past year and a half that he claimed a National security crisis in order for him to usurp Congress and our constitutional representation....?

The Boy Cried Wolf one too many times....the Supreme Court has managed to stop him, when it finally makes it there....like with tariffs, TWICE and putting his Military in cities crap against the Posse Comitatus Act, in starting this war in Iran, etc etc etc etc....

.... that when a legit National Security Threat reason may show its face, no one can believe him.....
 
This is what? The 100th time or so in the past year and a half that he claimed a National security crisis in order for him to usurp Congress and our constitutional representation....

The Boy Cried Wolf one too many times....the Supreme Court has managed to stop him, when it finally makes it there....like with tariffs, TWICE and putting his Military in cities crap against the Posse Comitatus Act, in starting this war in Iran, etc etc etc etc....

.... that when a legit National Security Threat reason may show its face, no one can believe him.....
The world has been exploiting America. There was a time this was intentional assistance from the U.S post-WWII. Now with the U.S losing so many factories, rising debt and ALL nations outsourcing to China, propping them up as they spy on America, poison your citizens, prop up Russia and Iran, threaten Taiwan, America needs to call out their "allies" and enemies alike before it is too late.

This is just the reality. I saw this long ago and even warned former Canadian governments during the Obama administration and beyond that we needed to protect our access to U.S market instead of arbitrage outsourcing and importing from China.

It turned out it was even worse than I suspected, far worse. We were engaging in trans-national exporting. Putting a "Made in Canada" label on sub par resources we forged in China. What a horrible and destructive decision which placed American construction at risk in some cases I imagine (for instance, if you use subpar steel in a building).
 
I understand the purpose.

What I don't like is that once again, he is using National Security Threat to claim he can legally do this without congress....
Congress supports President Trump.
 
Back
Top Bottom