Roe overturned

What's stopping you folks from coming to their aid with cash to help pay for the trip?
Often state laws. Texas for one makes it illegal to help a women seeking an abortion. The state is also encouraging citizens to report any case of abortion or anyone that helps a woman get an abortion. Similar to what Hitler did in his zeal to exterminate the Jews. Have citizens report their neighbors.
 
Obviously you haven't thought this through. AA pregnant woman who lives in a state with restrictive abortion laws can hope on a bus to go to a medical clinic in a state with more liberal abortion laws. Overturning Roe does not prevent any woman who wants an abortion in a medical clinic from getting one; it just makes it a little less convenient.
Well that sound easy providing you have the money and you can get an appointment. Neither transportation nor abortions are free and there's a problem getting Medicaid to pay for abortions in many states. And with the number of people crossing state lines to get an abortion, there is no guarantee that clinics with be able to accommodate everyone. The homeless will be the biggest problem because they are unlikely to have pregnancy's tests. Homeless women typically got pregnancy tests at abortion clinics as well as contraceptives and STD tests but they will be gone soon.
 
As I see it, mail order abortions where a drug can induce an abortion are about to be more commonplace. They're supposed to be good for up to10 weeks of a pregnancy, which means women better not wait too long to find out if they are in a family way. Such drugs will probably be illegal in states where any abortion is illegal, but I think enforcing that will be quite difficult. There will no doubt be friends, relatives, or associates living in abortion states that will help facilitate the transaction.
Medical abortions are illegal in states that have banned abortions however enforcing that ban on medical abortions will be almost impossible because the pills come through the mail and are taken in the privacy of a woman's home. I expect that they will be in great demand. The cost of the abortion pills in Mexico is about $35 for box of 28 over the counter. This drug is used for regulating a woman's period as well as to induce a miscarriage so there is no way the state can ban the drug itself and shipment thru the US mail has been made permanently legal.
 
Well that sound easy providing you have the money and you can get an appointment. Neither transportation nor abortions are free and there's a problem getting Medicaid to pay for abortions in many states. And with the number of people crossing state lines to get an abortion, there is no guarantee that clinics with be able to accommodate everyone. The homeless will be the biggest problem because they are unlikely to have pregnancy's tests. Homeless women typically got pregnancy tests at abortion clinics as well as contraceptives and STD tests but they will be gone soon.
No worries. I'm sure states with liberal abortion laws will do everything they can to help these poor, ignorant people you are talking about get their abortions and abortion enthusiasts like yourself will certainly see to it that these people have all the information and assistance they need to get an abortion because you care so very much about them.
 
CRT is being linked to abortion in the recent letter to Biden and Blinken:

5 Jul 2022 Letter to Biden and Blinken
'....As you may know, 15 Congress members on the Republican Study Committee wrote to you last week alleging that the State Department is using taxpayer dollars to "promote atheism worldwide." The members claimed that the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) is using funds to promote atheism and "radical, progressive orthodoxy across the world."....We urge you to dismiss the bad faith concerns of these members, who included radical political attacks against the State Department for "creating a 'Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice,' whose mission will be to spread Critical Race Theory and other progressive dogmas worldwide, and working to remove restrictions on abortion around the globe.'
 
The earliest mention found, was from a military publication of 9 Jun 2022:

'....plans to announce a Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice later this month.'

The report then appears on the State Department webpage on 17 Jun 2022.

Wikipedia is impotent to reveal anything about the background of Biden and Blinken's "Woke Czar," who will also be responsible for "disinformation" policing. We have already shown the scientific links to abortion, COVID-19, Fau Chi, Gates, etc. in this thread following the Roe v. Wade overturn. POSCOTUS, of course, did not mention this scientific history in its deliberations, because this science is irrelevant to the U.S. Constitution.

Biden State Department Puts "Woke Czar" in Charge of Equity and Justice
'....Desiree Cormier Smith....The Special Representative position continues the Biden administration's prioritization of a radical, progressive agenda the American people consistently reject....Smith would also be tasked with dealing with disinformation, an effort that has landed federal agencies in hot water in recent months.'
 
Biden's appointments directly link to the pathologies of CRT and by default, the pedophiliac molestation of America's children:

U.S. State Department Equity Action Plan
'....U.S. support for New United Nations body....2 Aug 2021, establishes Permanent Forum on People of African Descent (PFPAD)....State Department nominated Howard University School of Law Professor Justin Hansford as independent expert, elected 16 Dec 2021.'

The absurdity of this new UN outfit is easily revealed by a review of Leakey's work at Olduvai Gorge.

Justin Hansford
'....While a student at Georgetown, he founded the Georgetown Journal of Law and Modern Critical Race Perspectives....co-authored a piece for The Root on the project: "Black History Matters: Why President Obama Should Pardon Marcus Garvey." '

The obaman absurdity is that O's daddy was 87.5% Arab and about 12% black African, unless one again invokes Olduvai Gorge.

"....whose mission will be to spread Critical Race Theory and other progressive dogma worldwide, and working to remove restrictions on abortion around the globe."
 
No worries. I'm sure states with liberal abortion laws will do everything they can to help these poor, ignorant people you are talking about get their abortions and abortion enthusiasts like yourself will certainly see to it that these people have all the information and assistance they need to get an abortion because you care so very much about them.
That's a bit hard when the state makes it illegal to assist anyone seeking an abortion. But yes planned parenthood will help and other organizations will do what they can as well as states that have created a safe harbor to protect the woman from prosecution or arrest. These efforts will help only a bit. It will be up to the woman to get hold of abortion pills in time or get to another state that will help her.

I'm not an abortion enthusiast. I hate abortions and the reasons why women seek them. However, like the majority of people in the US, I hate even more having the government force women to bear unwanted children.

The research is clear: Restricting access to abortion doesn’t just harm women — it harms their children as well. It has a negative impact on her life and the lives of her children. Among women who are forced to bear unwanted children, more than 90 percent choose to keep and raise the child rather than place it up for adoption. Although some say that's great, the evidence suggest that it may not be what is best for child.

Aside from the problem of having an unwanted mouth to feed, the mother is likely to have problems bonding with her child which occurs during the first 12 months after birth. It can be overcome by mothers who really love their child but that is not typically the case with the unwanted child. When there is no bonding between mother and child, typically an attachment disorder occurs and the child will have problems forming permanent relationships which leads to all kinds development problems.

Given a choice between savings a fetus and saving a mother and child I will chose the latter every time.

 
Last edited:
That's a bit hard when the state makes it illegal to assist anyone seeking an abortion. But yes planned parenthood will help and other organizations will do what they can as well as states that have created a safe harbor to protect the woman from prosecution or arrest. These efforts will help only a bit. It will be up to the woman to get hold of abortion pills in time or get to another state that will help her.

I'm not an abortion enthusiast. I hate abortions and the reasons why women seek them. However, like the majority of people in the US, I hate even more having the government force women to bear unwanted children.

The research is clear: Restricting access to abortion doesn’t just harm women — it harms their children as well. It has a negative impact on her life and the lives of her children. Among women who are forced to bear unwanted children, more than 90 percent choose to keep and raise the child rather than place it up for adoption. Although some say that's great, the evidence suggest that it may not be what is best for child.

Aside from the problem of having an unwanted mouth to feed, the mother is likely to have problems bonding with her child which occurs during the first 12 months after birth. It can be overcome by mothers who really love their child but that is not typically the case with the unwanted child. When there is no bonding between mother and child, typically an attachment disorder occurs and the child will have problems forming permanent relationships which leads to all kinds development problems.

Given a choice between savings a fetus and saving a mother and child I will chose the latter every time.

There you go again, making up crazy stuff to try justify another rant in favor of abortion. No state has a law or has proposed a law that would prevent you from providing information and even financial assistance to a pregnant woman to help her get an abortion in another state. Nothing about overturning Roe will prevent any woman who wants an abortion from getting an abortion.
 
There you go again, making up crazy stuff to try justify another rant in favor of abortion. No state has a law or has proposed a law that would prevent you from providing information and even financial assistance to a pregnant woman to help her get an abortion in another state. Nothing about overturning Roe will prevent any woman who wants an abortion from getting an abortion.
In Texas, a section of abortion was proposed that would make it illegal to offer help in getting an abortion. Instead it included an unusual measure designed to ensure the law is enforced: Residents of the state can sue clinics, doctors, nurses and even people who drive a woman to get the procedure, for at least $10,000.
 
There you go again, making up crazy stuff to try justify another rant in favor of abortion. No state has a law or has proposed a law that would prevent you from providing information and even financial assistance to a pregnant woman to help her get an abortion in another state. Nothing about overturning Roe will prevent any woman who wants an abortion from getting an abortion.
There is 287,000 square miles in Texas and not a single abortion clinic. And 75% of abortions are low income where traveling to an abortion clinic somewhere in the country that has an open appointment for a free abortion is not going to be an option for most.
 
In Texas, a section of abortion was proposed that would make it illegal to offer help in getting an abortion. Instead it included an unusual measure designed to ensure the law is enforced: Residents of the state can sue clinics, doctors, nurses and even people who drive a woman to get the procedure, for at least $10,000.
More crazy stuff. You're talking about a law about helping a woman get an abortion in Texas, not helping a woman to travel to another state to get an abortion.
 
There is 287,000 square miles in Texas and not a single abortion clinic. And 75% of abortions are low income where traveling to an abortion clinic somewhere in the country that has an open appointment for a free abortion is not going to be an option for most.
What you are saying is that it will now be less convenient for some woman to get abortions, not that she will not be able to get one.
 
Maybe they should stop whoring around.
And they will become more careful with contraceptives, if for no other reason than to avoid the expense and hassle of disposing of their unwanted child. That's a win, IMO. The idea that two adults cannot control themselves enough to plan for unwanted pregnancy is, frankly, embarrassing.
 
In Texas, a section of abortion was proposed that would make it illegal to offer help in getting an abortion. Instead it included an unusual measure designed to ensure the law is enforced: Residents of the state can sue clinics, doctors, nurses and even people who drive a woman to get the procedure, for at least $10,000.
Yeah in Texas, but the resident's can cross state lines freely can't they ???
 
To be fair, that does work two ways ya know... lol

Some silver tongued devil's can talk a woman right out of her britches, and if no time to get that condom or any other form of contraception to counter the moment, she's as good as pregnant more than likely. This is usually when abortion is chosen as a contraception after the fact, so what has to happen in order to hopefully solve the issue, is to return to morals, ethic's and standard's that were based upon our religious value's and tenant's, otherwise in which we once used forever in this country. Might not stop it all, but it could reduce the numbers dramatically if we just got back to the basics again.

The guy usually doesn't mind the woman getting an abortion undoubtedly, otherwise concerning a woman going through the dramatic experience of aborting her baby, because all he was there for was a quick piece and then cya... This happens in some or in many cases. Not sure on the Numbers.

They are usually both at fault varying back and forth on who the most culpable in the situation were, but the results are devastating when a pregnancy develope's into a life, and then that life is just snuffed out because the poor little human being was considered a mistake when conceived.

Waiting until marriage should be the driven narrative once again in this country, and this could be taught as the leading narrative during sex education classes along with every negative consequence of having sex before marriage.

Most mother's should be considering the birth control pill for their daughter's, otherwise if they feel or know that their daughter might be vulnerable due to characteristics the daughter might start showing as she progresses along the journey of life into her future.

Preventive care on anything is the best care. Reactive care is bad because the situation ends up in usually as a bad rollercoaster ride to hell if not careful.
You seem to forget that whoring around spreads the Clap ,Syph ,and AIDS.
 
You seem to forget that whoring around spreads the Clap ,Syph ,and AIDS.
Ok, so why would my post not already cover that, even if it wasn't said directly ? I haven't forgotten anything, otherwise I know this as well as any other American citizen's living today should know the same.
 
There may be no provision for abortion in the Constitution, but Ben Franklin's pulegone abortifacient links to SARS-CoV-2 infection:

Jun 2022 SARS-CoV-2 / Glutathione-S-Transferase
'Anti-GSTO1-1 antibodies can also be found in different types of inflammatory diseases, such as autoimmune rheumatoid arthritis, infectious SARS-CoV-2 and trichinellosis....rather than a type of specific tumor-associated biomarker only.'

The GST Omega-1 antibody produced during COVID-19 infection links glutathione metabolism. We mentioned U. of Washington, Seattle for pulegone and piperonyl butoxide earlier in the thread:

May 1990 U. Washington, Seattle / Pulegone / Glutathione
'The glutathione-depleting effect of pulegone was compromised following inhibition of cytochrome P-450 by piperonyl butoxide.'

SCOTUS wIll not be arguing this above science from a public venue anytime soon. One wonders whether Bill Gates mentioned it when Fau Chi visited him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top