Thank god.Actually Trump looked at the list from the Heritage Foundation. He didn't look to see their qualifications. But instead trust the Heritage foundation to make the decision for him.
Can you imagine who he would have picked?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thank god.Actually Trump looked at the list from the Heritage Foundation. He didn't look to see their qualifications. But instead trust the Heritage foundation to make the decision for him.
I need a tranny-nazi-dwarf-autistic-crossdressing-pedoinclined-Albino! They are obviously badly underrepresented on the bench!This is a diverse group. No need to force fit something in here.
Your white male fragility is showing.Biden's pledge to appoint Black woman back in spotlight amid Breyer retirement — The Hill
President Biden's pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court is receiving renewed attention in the wake of reports [](https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/560353-justice-breyer-announces-retiremen)apple.news
I think this is the EXACTLY way we should choose jurists. You know: solely on the basis of gender and race.
I suspect Justice William O. Douglas will be spinning in his grave — like a top.
What’s the beef then?why on earth would someone's skin color and whether they have a penis or vagina have anything to do with whether they are qualified to a SCOTUS judge?
Like Reagan did? Cool.Well. He did limit it to a female candidate, so maybe not to worry.
Sure.I do believe the point I was making went over your head, Grump.
Could you link me to where a standing president said he was going to
pick a Black male for the SC position?
Could you link me to where a standing president said he was going to
pick a White female for the SC position?
I'll wait here for you while you find those links, thanks in advance.
LOL. So, it's ok if Reagan's first choice is "perfectly suitable conservative women" but God forbid, Biden's first choice is "perfectly suitable liberal women"?! And, you morons wonder why no one takes you seriously.And he found a perfectly suitable conservative woman. But I don’t believe he objected to considering perfectly qualified alternatives. Brandon does.
Women make up more than half of the population. The court should reflect that.The law is the law. I shouldnt be making decisions about the law based on my skin color or whether or not I have a penis. If I am Im probably not qualified to be a local judge let alone on the SCOTUS..
It will be one day for future generations when they see women and minorities in positions of power and think nothing of it.Remember what the Wokesters always say "race is just a social construct" ....yea, they aren't honest about that either.
It’s your choice to see them as a “token” rather than basing your judgement on their qualifications. Your choice of words says more about you than it does about Biden or his nominee.Nonsense, the notion that someone is specifically chosen because of color or gender is what raises eyebrows. You can't really blame folks for having doubts about someone's ability if it looks like they a just a token. Racist decisions like basing picks by any criteria than merit creates the problem.
Best of the best? No. Certainly not based on their recent decisions.You mean all three picks by Trump weren't racist? He couldn't find one single non white person to choose out of all the judges available? Not one? I find that hard to believe. Don't get me wrong, their personal politics aside (and in the case of Cavanaugh his Frat-boy personality), I think Barrett and Cavanaugh were both highly qualified picks, but were they the best of the best?
The qualifications here black and female. That's all Biden.It’s your choice to see them as a “token” rather than basing your judgement on their qualifications. Your choice of words says more about you than it does about Biden or his nominee.
What’s the beef then?
Women make up more than half of the population. The court should reflect that.
I'm sure they are. He said he was going to nominate a black woman over 2 years ago. It would be weird if the top people on his list were Asian men. Do you think he's said over 2 years ago that he's nominating a black woman because the 2 most qualified people he could find to do the job were black women or because "It's time we had a black woman on the court"?His top two candidates are black women.
As usual the uninformed leftards spout off while knowing nothing. As soon as the unpresidential Xiden announced on,y women of color need apply, that eliminates a lot of more qualified individuals. Race over qualification. That got us the not so wise Latina.Of course, today the trumplets are showing us they automatically believe no woman or POC can possibly be qualified.................even before any names are brought forward.
Consider yourself defeated on the matter.You know nothing but racism.
Yeah, we should go back to the good old days when only wealthy white male landowners could vote. Not.White men ruled America as we became the envy of the world. We've gone down hill since we started letting everyone vote. There is a lesson to be learned there.
Absolutely. I think if he didn’t think there was a black women eminently qualified he wouldn’t have said it. There is no age requirement yet he didn’t promise to put a HS kid on the SC because there aren’t any qualified.I'm sure they are. He said he was going to nominate a black woman over 2 years ago. It would be weird if the top people on his list were Asian men. Do you think he's said over 2 years ago that he's nominating a black woman because the 2 most qualified people he could find to do the job were black women or because "It's time we had a black woman on the court"?